Porn is without a doubt, mankind's greatest technological advancement of all time. It is the sole reason Al Gore invented the Internets. Some argue he invented it so he could fap without leaving n00dz around the house for his prudish wife Bill to find.
Here be truth.
It is usually NSFW, but there is always SFW Porn. Ninety-nine percent of all bandwidth on the internets is devoted to porn of one form or another. Ninety-nine percent of all interracial porn is made by Jews as a part of their strategy to destroy the white race, although this is possibly bollocks. Porn is often uncovered doing a Data recovery.
On the Internets, "porn" can be spelled in any of the following ways:
- apr financing
- your mum
What's in that folder that's marked "Bills" on your hard drive, in case your other half cracks your password (it's your birthday, dummy); but in actuality holds the wank-bank full of images of women that look exactly-not like your missus.
Pornography is extremely subjective in that not everyone will find something a turn on. Under no circumstances look at another blokes collection as it will likely contain an orgy of one legged midgets dressed as rabi's in latex Cherie Blair masks sandpapering each others genitals while eating pork pies. Worse, it might contain Paris 'bonebag' Hilton's sex tape.
The Legal Bit
The legal definition of Pornography is, "Material which is liable to corrupt." Now that got me thinking (oo-err missus) if you were to be prosecuted for having an unfeasibly large porn collection what would happen if the judge had a good look at it. If he wasn't corrupted, it can't have been porn. If he was corrupted can he still send you to The Big House? Has anyone ever been sent down by a judge who happened to be having a wank at the time?