As I doubt anyone posting on here lives in a bedsit, it is just insulting you for the pleasure of doing so.
If you genuinely are not a silly schoolgirl but have any form of higher education you really are to be pitied.
If we were to do the same with regard to you (and your posts), we could surmise that you are a cumdrenched wankspangle. I, for one have the intellygencebranes nous to know that you are just a bite fishing big silly.
Picture the scene. He wanders into his local police station and says “a bloke calling himself amazing lobster left bad reviews on Yell”. The police wouldn't be interested in reviews on Yell. You know that, I know that and presumably Oddbod knows that too. If the police were interested in something reported to them it may suggest that something more serious, something potentially criminal had been reported. Only he and perhaps you know that.
When asked for evidence of this, he replies the reviews and gut feeling. If you say so.
Belgium cannot even deal with the international sex trafficking and labour trafficking coming in to Belgium, or even keep an eye on their own terrorists. What does Belgium have to do with anything? You implied that being in Belgium when an online offence was committed gave immunity to investigation / prosecution by UK police. That is patently not the case of course. Being in Belgium during an investigation is no protection from UK law regardless of the offence.
Do you think they are going to waste time on this with UK plod? By they, presumably you mean The Belgian authorities? What have they to do with anything. Of course, if the UK ask Belgium to detain a suspect for return to the UK...
And comparing it to terrorism? Really? There more chance of someone reporting Oddbod and him losing his firearms and right to visit the US. Sounds like yet another threat to damage a person's reputation. @Oddbod, you may like to screen shot this and the preceding post(s) in which Dr Doctor Professor Internet Stalker makes his ludicrous assertions based only on your posting style.
Edit: and no one do this please - as much as I think he’s a fat beardy weirdy, he doesn’t deserve to have his QoL destroyed. How convincing is that?
No, 'course not - Plod haven't the time or the resources to get involved with silly things people say on the internet or when some wet-blanket professes to have slightly scuffed feelings. No sirree-bob!
"The Communications Act 2003 defines illegal communication as “using public electronic communications network in order to cause annoyance, inconvenience or needless anxiety”. Breaking the law carries a six-month prison term or fine of up to £5,000. "
As such I shall suppress my initial notion to query your apparent knowledge of sex trafficking in Belgium with your presence there in conjunction with earlier comments referring to your attempts to allegedly elicit intimate details about another ArRSer's under-age daughter.