"You're a poo-poo head!"..."No, you're a poo-poo head" - Sticky for handbag swinging

OneTenner

LE
Book Reviewer
@DaManBugs @RBMK
... the majority of us hate freeloading scroungers who take our tax money and give nothing back to society....
So noodly armed fantasy Socialists then?


BTW, is it time for Bugsy Bingo yet?
 

RBMK

War Hero
It's funny how the freeloading scroungers who contribute nothing to society are the first ones to complain as soon as the antics of the drinking classes are outed.

It's almost as if Bugsy is a dole-ite who has been taking money off the state for years and handing anti-government propaganda out.
 

OneTenner

LE
Book Reviewer
Almost?
 

OneTenner

LE
Book Reviewer
It's always made me smile that the more Socialist a society, the more corruption is endemic within it - and they have the neck to:-
1) criticise our way of life
2) leave as soon as they have the chance
3) benefit from and simutaneously criticise our way of life....
 

OneTenner

LE
Book Reviewer

OneTenner

LE
Book Reviewer
I hope that's not a euphemism.
Here's Bogsy's family - all of them, before and after their first deaths - all with dobbers poised for action, some are holding them in their hands....
1596834183758.png
 

RBMK

War Hero
Once again another thread locked by the mods after our favourite moron kicks off on his usual turpentine and cheap cider fuelled attacks on other posters. Yes, it's ye olde pigeon shouter of older Nottinghame towne.

Rocks up at a random time and then kicks off at someone [anyone] within three posts.

We ought to be sorry for him. Can you imagine what a dull and meaningless life he has to have to come on an internet forum on a Friday night with the express intention of starting an argument with prople he has never met. I can't personally imagine what sense of fulfilment this gives his pathetic life.

I imagine that most come on here for a conversation and discussion with like minded people, plus the shits and giggle of a military sense of humour [as I do]. As far as I can tell DaManBugs gets his kicks from deliberately winding people up and the only reason that he is not banned is that he will do what he's done before and just create a new identity.

So let us all say a little prayer that DaManBugs find fulfilment in his life, preferably somewhere a long way away from arrse.
 
Once again another thread locked by the mods after our favourite moron kicks off on his usual turpentine and cheap cider fuelled attacks on other posters. Yes, it's ye olde pigeon shouter of older Nottinghame towne.

Rocks up at a random time and then kicks off at someone [anyone] within three posts.
In his defence (I feel a bit dirty saying that) he asked a reasonable question, albeit in a rather irritating way. What then happened was a bunch of people decided to prod him into a meltdown which he promptly did.

The thread is here if you want to double check - https://www.arrse.co.uk/community/threads/scroungers.301209/ but I make it roughly 12 provocative / abusive posts from Bugsy and about 17 from other people aimed at him.

Everyone knows what happens so I don't understand this "Oh, Bugsy's ruined another thread again" attitude. Perhaps "Bugsy's been encouraged to ruin another thread again by people who are trying to make him do that" might be more appropriate?

Either prod him into another spittle-flecked meltdown and enjoy it or don't engage him unless he addresses you first and then lecture him about ruining threads, you can't really have both.
 
In his defence (I feel a bit dirty saying that) he asked a reasonable question, albeit in a rather irritating way. What then happened was a bunch of people decided to prod him into a meltdown which he promptly did.

The thread is here if you want to double check - https://www.arrse.co.uk/community/threads/scroungers.301209/ but I make it roughly 12 provocative / abusive posts from Bugsy and about 17 from other people aimed at him.

Everyone knows what happens so I don't understand this "Oh, Bugsy's ruined another thread again" attitude. Perhaps "Bugsy's been encouraged to ruin another thread again by people who are trying to make him do that" might be more appropriate?

Either prod him into another spittle-flecked meltdown and enjoy it or don't engage him unless he addresses you first and then lecture him about ruining threads, you can't really have both.
Don't look at me, I have him on "ignore".
 
In his defence (I feel a bit dirty saying that) he asked a reasonable question, albeit in a rather irritating way. What then happened was a bunch of people decided to prod him into a meltdown which he promptly did.

The thread is here if you want to double check - https://www.arrse.co.uk/community/threads/scroungers.301209/ but I make it roughly 12 provocative / abusive posts from Bugsy and about 17 from other people aimed at him.

Everyone knows what happens so I don't understand this "Oh, Bugsy's ruined another thread again" attitude. Perhaps "Bugsy's been encouraged to ruin another thread again by people who are trying to make him do that" might be more appropriate?

Either prod him into another spittle-flecked meltdown and enjoy it or don't engage him unless he addresses you first and then lecture him about ruining threads, you can't really have both.
I agree.

But I do expect that whilst his original question was reasonable, his follow up would have been true to form. Even so, I think perhaps we jumped the gun and should have waited for him to say something truly ludicrous.

Which he was bound to do...
 
Last edited:
I haven't had a response from Bugsy for a good while now, on the rare occasion there is one, it's normally a colossal rant.
Those that get responses are fking failures to be fair. That's probably why dumb Bugsy has rated me as cat 1 vermin, in his small mind the whole world is against him. It's got fcuk all to do with his fondness of internet fable telling, in his small mind of course.
 
Top