You gotta opt in for your porn fix!!

#1
The Mothers Union! Another bunch of God botherers telling everybody what they can and cannot do?

I don't particularly care whether you wanna watch the latest episodes of Lucy does London or not but it does get my up my nose when a particular group, religeous or otherwise, want to dictate their moral do's and dont's on the rest of us. I imagine some on here might have a bit of a panic attack if the Mothers Union gets it's way?

.......................................................

Subscribers to four of the UK's biggest internet service providers will have to "opt in" if they want to view sexually explicit websites, as part of government-sponsored curbs on online pornography.

The measures will be unveiled on Tuesday as David Cameron hosts No 10 meeting with the Mothers' Union, which earlier this year produced a raft of proposals to shield children from sexualised imagery.

The prime minister is expected to announce other moves in line with the Christian charity's review, such as restrictions on aggressive advertising campaigns and certain types of images on billboards.

Here's a link to the whole article: Pornography to be blocked by internet service providers unless users opt in | Technology | The Guardian
 
C

cloudbuster

Guest
#5
The headache just won't shift and I woke up in a cold sweat. Ibuprofen hasn't made me any better and she just stares and stares. It's Jack Daniels fault.
So you had a kip and woke up with a headache caused by surfing Arrse, and the first thing you did was log back on? Self-inflicted, I think.
 
#6
Well that should be interesting. Whose definition of "porn" will this be? Surely an "opt out" would make more sense.

Guess the other service providers will be seeing more members.
 
G

goatrutar

Guest
#8
Most of these right wing christian nutters are closet paedos anyway. Trying to put the "fun" back into fundamentalism. Fucking cunts.
 
#9
Funny didn't Labour suggest exactly that a few years ago, only for the Tories to announce that it was a silly idea and would never happen under them? Where's a Journo when you actually need one.
 
#11
What are you whinging about?

If Tracey has opted out of her teenage son's online wankfest that frees up the depravity bandwidth for all us old deviants.

It's also going to make for some awkward, but highly amusing, conversations for married blokes.
 
#12
Thankfully this will only apply to new subscribers.So all you freaks already thrapping over pixilated images of girls with no tops on are in the clear.
 
#13
Kids will find porn no matter what how difficult it made to access.As a 13/14 yr old kid in the 1950s I used to use my dinner money to buy 'Glamour' mags,prior to that I used to drool over the ladies underwear ads in the now defunct 'NOW',I then progressed onto mail order catalouges.The glamour mags cost 3/6p and always came in a brown paper bag,as a very young looking 13/14yr old it was difficult to find a under the counter shop that would serve me,but there is always one who will.At school there was always a queue at the library when the latest National Geographic magazine was put on the shelf,the girls at school used to call us dirty old men if they saw us reading it,,,,Those were the days...........
 

jarrod248

LE
Gallery Guru
#15
Clear your cookie cache, open another browser window and google for something that'll take your mind off the wicked little minx. Pastel curtains, loafers, that sort of thing.
No it doesn't work, It's Jack Daniels, he's caused all this, the granny on the sofa is back now. The orange one will soon be back on my screen I know it.
 
#17
Fucking lazy twat parenting triumphs again. So instead of parents actually making an effort to supervise their childrens use of computers, these fuckwits (who probably shouldn't have been allowed to bred) annoy the government into pushing some idiotic proposal to make people sign up for porn as if it'll magically cure society's ills.
 

B_AND_T

MIA
Book Reviewer
#18
Now I may be missing something here, but when you Google" Anal Goat Fisting" you are opting in!
 
#19
Well that should be interesting. Whose definition of "porn" will this be? Surely an "opt out" would make more sense.

Guess the other service providers will be seeing more members.
I refer you to the answer given by that hero of free speech United States Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart :

"I shall not today attempt further to define the kinds of material I understand to be embraced within that shorthand description ["hard-core pornography"]; and perhaps I could never succeed in intelligibly doing so. But I know it when I see it,"

So he must have opted in then?
 
M

Mark The Convict

Guest
#20
Please make her go away.
Jarrod.

I don't mean to be unsympathetic, you're clearly suffering, but you've simply got to get a grip, dammit. Put a bloody Post-It note over it. Use a pink one and draw a pretty piccy on it. Gargle something glutinous and hawk a gobby onto the screen. Use your initiative. Imagine it's RearWords, that should cheer you up, or enrage you, one of the two.

What would Julian Clary do?
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
Crusty(LE) The NAAFI Bar 4
cheesypoptart Multinational HQ 1
H Lonely Hearts 38

Similar threads

Latest Threads

Top