YarS' anti-west Russian apologist thread

Man, any supposing about details of "secret deals" are unprovable and, likely, are false. Suggestions that there was no any secret and politics were talking only about what was wrote - is rubbish and false by the definition.
The Soviet Union collapsed and a lot of data was revealed. The UK hasn't collapsed but we have had numerous data releases including SECRET data over the years. Nothing like the memo on the M R Pact. Meanwhile, Russia collaborated with the Nazi's whilst we fought them
Ha! We are fighting for our own side. If Brits, Francs was not accepted our suggestions about our interests in Europe and new safety system we can make a deal with Germans.
Yep, collaborating with German's and Nazi's.
It was civil war in Spain.
We supported none intervention and remained neutral. Many Brits supported the Republicans.
It is exactly what we do now. Terrorists should be eliminated.
What you call 'terrorists' and what are 'terrorists' are often different to the reality.
Ha! Hope on this, my little Unrus friend.
Ha, know this and glad to be an 'Unrus' frankly.
 
Last edited:
More bombs - less terrorists. Less terrorists - closer peace.
Irrespective of the amount of civilians killed?
Why did he think, that Russia need to stop Assad? Russia need money. Terrorists sit on our money.
Terrorists are sitting on your money in Ghouta? What have you been drinking?
 
Here you go Comrade Yars, wriggle out of this one:


A documentary on the Spetsnatz. Your brave troops go on to say that their own officers left them to be massacred in Chechnya and instead of support heliocopters they had to make their own way out and even buy their own train tickets back to the Motherland.

Full vid from start:

The Spetsnatz offier also says quite clearly that the Russian Army is only good for drinking, which suggests that they're all pissed out their head on vodka 27/7 (as the rest of the world already knows).

The bit about being ordered to open up on a crowd of civilians in Lithuania by the Kremlin is also a nice touch. You really do live in an evil and corrupt country, I'd be ashamed if I were you.
 
Ha! We are The Swarm, you know (as @scalieback had read in Reuters-produced world). We don't need any weapon but our teeth and tentacles.
@YarS in the (Warhammer 40K) Army inbetween rapes. The lifecycle does seem too long:
 

YarS

On ROPS
On ROPs
The Soviet Union collapsed and a lot of data was revealed. The UK hasn't collapsed but we have had numerous data releases including SECRET data over the years.
1. Let's wait for collapse of UK.
2. Not all "secret" data was revealed.
3. Brits are too lazy and stupid, even for reading open sources.
Nothing like the memo on the M R Pact.
I'm sure, you didn't read Düsseldorf's agreement from 15 March, 1939.
Meanwhile, Russia collaborated with the Nazi's whilst we fought them
And UK was collaborated with the Nazi's whilst we fought them. Actually UK is collaborated with Nazies in Ukraine and Spratland.
Yep, collaborating with German's and Nazi's.
There are no any moral difference between Yanks, Brits and Germans.
We supported none intervention and remained neutral. Many Brits supported the Republicans.
And many Brits (including members of the royal family) were wearing colours of Nazies.


What you call 'terrorists' and what are 'terrorists' are often different to the reality.
In the newspeak "terrorist" means just "bad guy". Of course, we have different understanding of "bad" and "good". Russia is good. Everybody who is against Russia - is bad. Every ungovernment organisation, fighting against Russia with weapon in their hands is terroristic organisation.
 

YarS

On ROPS
On ROPs
A documentary on the Spetsnatz. Your brave troops go on to say that their own officers left them to be massacred in Chechnya and instead of support heliocopters they had to make their own way out and even buy their own train tickets back to the Motherland.
I'm not ready to watch almost two hours of stupid British propaganda. First - if they were "massacred", there was not possibility to buy tickets for them.
Second: Magazines from RPK joined to AK-74, GP-25 under every barrel, lack of targeting devices clearly demonstrate that it is not any kind of "specnaz". Third, word "specnaz" means only "special purpose", and there are many different types of specnaz in a different forces. Actually, "Specnaz of MVD (inner department)" is not "SAS" but more close to "SWAT" or something...
 
Why not? It wad not raping, it was a deal. And yes, price of honor (at least in medieval Ireland) was measured in maidens ("cumals").
Wait - are you freely admitting that you abused a position of power in order to exploit a hungry female just for your own personal gratification? And then try to justify it by claiming it was simply a transactional arrangement, topped off with referencing historical precedence that is around 1000 years past?

And you wonder why we view you as ill-educated peasants not much more advanced from the time of your Glourious Revolution of 1917.

How is that getting on by the way?

Thanks. Using a prostitute is not raping. Its a deal. It is not honourable, it is not dishonourable. Something like visiting cinema. May be, bit honourable as somekind of charity.
Exploiting a fellow human being who is so hungry they would debase themselves just for food is not a meeting of equals though, is it? How much "choice" did she really have?

Still, whatever helps you sleep at night . . .
 
1. Let's wait for collapse of UK.
2. Not all "secret" data was revealed.
3. Brits are too lazy and stupid, even for reading open sources.
Yeah, okay..... Ours or yours? Pot, this is kettle, you're black.
I'm sure, you didn't read Düsseldorf's agreement from 15 March, 1939.
I did and any analogy between that and the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact with its 'Secret agreement' is just juvenile flailing.
And UK was collaborated with the Nazi's whilst we fought them.
Nope, you turned up two years late.
Actually UK is collaborated with Nazies in Ukraine and Spratland.
Their govts are run by the equivalent of the NSDAP?
There are no any moral difference between Yanks, Brits and Germans.
You're not in any position to talk about morals.
And many Brits (including members of the royal family) were wearing colours of Nazies.
You really need more pictures of Russian Nazi's? Some Royals sympathising with Nazi ideology is hardly the same as a govt doing the same and then allying with them. Nice tats on the Queen btw :)
In the newspeak "terrorist" means just "bad guy". Of course, we have different understanding of "bad" and "good". Russia is good. Everybody who is against Russia - is bad. Every ungovernment organisation, fighting against Russia with weapon in their hands is terroristic organisation.
Of course. Kill them all. It worked so well in the past :rolleyes:
 

YarS

On ROPS
On ROPs
I did and any analogy between that and the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact with its 'Secret agreement' is just juvenile flailing.
Ok. Compare comparable things. Please, write small article "Compare of Soviet and British politic of neutrality in the pre-War period". Compare open parts of Molotov-Ribbentrop and Chamberlain-Hitler pacts.
Nope, you turned up two years late.
Nope. We start our war with Nazies at 1936 in proxy mode in Spain. All this time UK was friend and ally of Nazy Germany.
Their govts are run by the equivalent of the NSDAP?
They have no independent govt's. So, their Nazi politic are politic of EU, USA and NATO.
You're not in any position to talk about morals.
You (including Germans and Yanks) don't know what is moral at all.
You really need more pictures of Russian Nazi's?
Some of Russians are Nazies, as some of Brits are anti-Nazies. Actually, very little amount. State politic of UK at 1933-1939 was pro-Nazi.
Of course. Kill them all. It worked so well in the past :rolleyes:
It will work as well in future, my little untraditionalistic friend.
 

YarS

On ROPS
On ROPs
Wait - are you freely admitting that you abused a position of power in order to exploit a hungry female just for your own personal gratification?
Yes. Not only for my personal gratification. Also it was some kind of humiliation of her male relatives and may be, even little lesson of discipline and prevention of terroristic activity. My honour is ability to crush their honour.
And then try to justify it by claiming it was simply a transactional arrangement,
Yes, it was.
topped off with referencing historical precedence that is around 1000 years past?
Actually I try to understand, what is your modern understanding of the term "honour", but I'm failed. I think, that you have no any "honour".
And you wonder why we view you as ill-educated peasants not much more advanced from the time of your Glourious Revolution of 1917.
Do you know how we view you? As degenerated biomass, fuel for bioreactors.
Exploiting a fellow human being who is so hungry they would debase themselves just for food is not a meeting of equals though, is it?
Sure. She was not eating, may be at few days, I was not having sex at few months. Who was more struggling?
How much "choice" did she really have?
Enough of it.
 
Ok. Compare comparable things. Please, write small article "Compare of Soviet and British politic of neutrality in the pre-War period". Compare open parts of Molotov-Ribbentrop and Chamberlain-Hitler pacts.
Your title is wrong for a start. "Compare and contrast Britain's attempts to avoid war and simultaneously prepare for it whilst the Soviet Union gets into bed with the Nazi's" is a much better one.
Nope. We start our war with Nazies at 1936 in proxy mode in Spain. All this time UK was friend and ally of Nazy Germany.
Once again, your proxy war had nothing to do with the UK. We're the ones trying to de-escalate it.
They have no independent govt's. So, their Nazi politic are politic of EU, USA and NATO.
You really bring stupidity to a new level.
You (including Germans and Yanks) don't know what is moral at all.
It's quite clear you have none and no idea what they are.
Some of Russians are Nazies, as some of Brits are anti-Nazies. Actually, very little amount. State politic of UK at 1933-1939 was pro-Nazi.
It's a big game and whilst initially liking the German govt digging themselves out of the mess, their advance in the Rhineland, Austria and Sudetanland made us realise war was inevitable. Still, we didn't ally with the nazi's unlike you.
It will work as well in future, my little untraditionalistic friend.
We'll see, but I doubt it will go your way.
 
mr putin отправляет свою любовь ко всему на арест, он любит вас, как брат
 
Yes. Not only for my personal gratification. Also it was some kind of humiliation of her male relatives and may be, even little lesson of discipline and prevention of terroristic activity. My honour is ability to crush their honour.

Yes, it was.

Actually I try to understand, what is your modern understanding of the term "honour", but I'm failed. I think, that you have no any "honour".

Do you know how we view you? As degenerated biomass, fuel for bioreactors.

Sure. She was not eating, may be at few days, I was not having sex at few months. Who was more struggling?

Enough of it.
Priceless. Best laugh I've had today, cheers.

And as for your first response above, this one is just for you:

What is best in life.jpg
 

YarS

On ROPS
On ROPs
Your title is wrong for a start. "Compare and contrast Britain's attempts to avoid war and simultaneously prepare for it whilst the Soviet Union gets into bed with the Nazi's" is a much better one.
Oh, yes... I see good old school of British journalists. Make a result before research. First compare Soviet preparations for the war and the British one.

Once again, your proxy war had nothing to do with the UK. We're the ones trying to de-escalate it.
We were fighting against Nazies while you were "trying to de-escalate it" (in fact, supporting Germany).
It's a big game and whilst initially liking the German govt digging themselves out of the mess, their advance in the Rhineland, Austria and Sudetanland made us realise war was inevitable. Still, we didn't ally with the nazi's unlike you.
Sure. West was trying to "detterent Soviets", and Nazies were one of you.
 
Oh, yes... I see good old school of British journalists. Make a result before research. First compare Soviet preparations for the war and the British one.
No need for a preamble. Your title of 'Russian neutrality' shows your bias as there was none.
We were fighting against Nazies while you were "trying to de-escalate it" (in fact, supporting Germany).
You were training and equipping Republicans (who lost btw).. You weren't 'fighting Nazi's'.

'Supporting Germany' means trying to de-escalate a civil war' and acceding to some of Hitler's demands? That's the same as allying and agreeing to a carve up of other sovereign states?
Sure. West was trying to "detterent Soviets", and Nazies were one of you.
Deterring Soviets by stopping them putting their tank army on Poland's front lawn like they did in the Baltic's. Still, so long as you're happy with your country surrendering toi Germany, allowing Germany to train contrary to Versailles and then allying with Nazi's...........
 

YarS

On ROPS
On ROPs
No need for a preamble. Your title of 'Russian neutrality' shows your bias as there was none.
Of course, Soviet Union also was playing in the big game "Not allow to Europeans create united anti-Soviet front".

You were training and equipping Republicans (who lost btw).. You weren't 'fighting Nazi's'.
Of course, we were fighting Nazies.

By the Soviet government were send 1811 specialists: 772 aviators, 351 tanksmen, 222 infantry, 77 sailors, more than 150 other, 130 workers and engeneers, 156 scaliebacks, 204 interpreters. Killed in action- 127, dead from wounds — 11, lost — 32, dead in accidents - 19.
It mean fighting with Nazies in proxy war.

'Supporting Germany' means trying to de-escalate a civil war' and acceding to some of Hitler's demands? That's the same as allying and agreeing to a carve up of other sovereign states?
Yes. And yes, Poland was notified, that in case of her invasion in Chzehoslovakia, Russian-Poland treaty of not-agression is denounced. They invade Chzehoslovakia,
 

Latest Threads

Top