WW3 news

Really? The Admiral Vinogradov is 8m or so longer, but the USS John McCain's full load displacement is 1000 tons more.


No idea on which one has the thickest hull/armour, probably not much in it.
You are absolutely right.
There is another important parameter - maximal speed
McCain - 56 km/h = 15,56 m/sec
Adm.Vinogradov 65 km/h = 18,06 m/sec
Now let's suppose that both vessels are not overloaded and their displacements (= masses) are standard
McCain - 6,900,000 kg
Adm.Vinogradov - 6,200,000 kg
Now let's recall kinetic energy formula
E = M*V*V/2
So maximal kinetic energy (in MegaJoules) would be
McCain - 835
Adm.Vinogradov 1011
 
You are absolutely right.
There is another important parameter - maximal speed
McCain - 56 km/h = 15,56 m/sec
Adm.Vinogradov 65 km/h = 18,06 m/sec
Now let's suppose that both vessels are not overloaded and their displacements (= masses) are standard
McCain - 6,900,000 kg
Adm.Vinogradov - 6,200,000 kg
Now let's recall kinetic energy formula
E = M*V*V/2
So maximal kinetic energy (in MegaJoules) would be
McCain - 835
Adm.Vinogradov 1011
So, how minscule is your willy, seeing as you seem to enjoy waving it around?

 
So, how minscule is your willy, seeing as you seem to enjoy waving it around?

Do you suggest that the British used to send something unusable in the UK to the Soviet union as lend-lease help?
 
Do you suggest that the British used to send something unusable in the UK to the Soviet union as lend-lease help?
Just the surplus Ivan, just the surplus. We sent the small stuff to India.
 
All that raping at wars' end, did your comrades use those condoms?
Jewish soldiers in the ranks of the Red Army used to revenge raping German women. Highly likely they didn't use the condoms kindly send by the British.
From 350 to 500 thousands of Jews served in the Red army (1941-45).
A particular role in circulating information about the participation of Jews in combat and about Jewish heroism was played by the Jewish Anti-Fascist Committee (JAC)
Many of the articles were intended to make the point that, in addition to the war they shared with the other Soviet peoples, Soviet Jews had their own war, their own score to settle with the Nazis. In 1942 the Soviet Yiddish prose writer Dovid Bergelson wrote that the Soviet Jews were fighting "Far zayn foterland un zayn yidishn folk," i.e., for their [Soviet] homeland and their Jewish people. As the details of the Nazi mass murder of Jewish civilians became increasing known during the war, the ethnic consciousness of a large proportion of Jewish soldiers and officers grew and increasingly motivated them in their fighting.
 
Jewish soldiers in the ranks of the Red Army used to revenge raping German women. Highly likely they didn't use the condoms kindly send by the British.
From 350 to 500 thousands of Jews served in the Red army (1941-45).

So the raping of German women in 1945 was restricted to Jewish soldiers in the Red Army? Is that why so many of them ended up digging holes in Kolyma? Or was it just that Stalin didn't like Jews, or Cossacks, Ethnic Germans, Chechens? Other nationalities are available, especially Poles.
 
So the raping of German women in 1945 was restricted to Jewish soldiers in the Red Army? Is that why so many of them ended up digging holes in Kolyma? Or was it just that Stalin didn't like Jews, or Cossacks, Ethnic Germans, Chechens? Other nationalities are available, especially Poles.
These articles not only recounted the military exploits of Jews but often put the accounts into their more general ethnic context. The materials stressed the ethnic origin of the heroes and their following of the ancient Jewish heroic tradition, as embodied by Samson, the Macabbees, Bar Kochba etc. Many of the articles were intended to make the point that, in addition to the war they shared with the other Soviet peoples, Soviet Jews had their own war, their own score to settle with the Nazis.
Deuteronomy 21:10–14 states:
When thou goest forth to war against thine enemies, and the Lord thy God hath delivered them into thine hands, and thou hast taken them captive, And seest among the captives a beautiful woman, and hast a desire unto her, that thou wouldest have her to thy wife
The idea that the captive woman will be raped is supported by the fact that in passages like Isaiah 13:16 and Zechariah 14:2, sieges lead to women being "ravished"
 
And?
 

Are you suggesting that a passage from a book of myths from 3000 years ago gives soldiers the right to rape non combatants, innocent civilians?
Or are you using that as an excuse for why they did it?
 
Are you suggesting that a passage from a book of myths from 3000 years ago gives soldiers the right to rape non combatants, innocent civilians?
Or are you using that as an excuse for why they did it?
For you they are just myths (btw, for me too). But the Faith that exists 5 thousands years for its followers is something very serious. Those who really believe follow the rules established thousands of years ago blindly.
If we speak about war crimes then the context is extremely important. On the background of crimes conducted by the Nazis, other crimes, their scale was not so huge as being regarded separately.
According to Yad Vashem site, Jewish soldiers during WW2 acted according to customs, traditions that were elaborated long ago. I believe that such a claim looks as credible one.
 
For you they are just myths (btw, for me too). But the Faith that exists 5 thousands years for its followers is something very serious. Those who really believe follow the rules established thousands of years ago blindly.
If we speak about war crimes then the context is extremely important. On the background of crimes conducted by the Nazis, other crimes, their scale was not so huge as being regarded separately.
According to Yad Vashem site, Jewish soldiers during WW2 acted according to customs, traditions that were elaborated long ago. I believe that such a claim looks as credible one.
In that case they have no right to criticise German war crimes, as they have, as you say, been committing war crimes for 5000 years.
More recently, certain group of people are also using their book of myths to justify the murder of innocent civilians, and many Russians have been the victims of these barbarians.
The Geneva Conventions govern the rules of warfare, not dusty old books written by stone age control freaks.
 
In that case they have no right to criticise German war crimes, as they have, as you say, been committing war crimes for 5000 years.
More recently, certain group of people are also using their book of myths to justify the murder of innocent civilians, and many Russians have been the victims of these barbarians.
The Geneva Conventions govern the rules of warfare, not dusty old books written by stone age control freaks.
The very expression 'they have no right' or its mirrored form 'the have right' are relative. They depend on point of view. Have the Jewish people right to expel others form 'God given lands'? They think that yes. Others are not so sure. And of course the expelled are strongly against.
From point of view of the People of the Book the Geneva Convention is only quite recently adopted standard not approved by their holly customs. The norms written in the Geneva convention became a part of the international law less than one century ago. On the background of 50 centuries long Jewish history it is just avery short time interval.
The Russians and the English emerged as nations about 1000 years ago or so. For the Jews we are just children compared with matured nation with God given wisdom.
Let's recall 'Inglorious Basterds' film by Quentin Tarantino. Yes, it's just a fantasy but founded on imaginary implementations of some existing principles.
 

Latest Threads

Top