Why doesnt -------- enlist his son?

Discussion in 'The Intelligence Cell' started by OldRedCap, Oct 11, 2006.

Welcome to the Army Rumour Service, ARRSE

The UK's largest and busiest UNofficial military website.

The heart of the site is the forum area, including:

  1. Point of ten raised here. Obviously the US Army has the same questions raised. The quote is from a US soldier but the point made is universal. Think of it next time someone comes up with that question.
  2. And that's also the reason that going where sent does not constitute an illegal order - despite what some American soldiers are saying.

    Illegal orders are the ones that contravene National laws or International agreements that your country has signed up to.

    An order that goes against your own moral code of ethics? Then don't join the military.
  3. Or the Police if you don't want to guard the Isreali Embassy!
  4. Haven't you had a couple of them on your side of the pond? I seem to recall an RAF Colonel being told he has a 'Greatly inflated sense of his own importance' by a presiding court-martial judge.

    The argument goes back at least as far as Michal Moore's (Spit, spit) Fahrenheit 9/11 days, where he goes around to get Congresscritters to get their kids to enlist.

  5. I cant stand the idea that people think it would be perfectly acceptable for a politician (or anyone else) to force their child into joining the Military.

    The oh so common calls of 'Why doesn’t Blair get his lad to join up' are the epitome of stupidity, perhaps because Blair jnr has rights and individual freedoms. The problem is most politicians themselves haven’t served, and completely lack an understanding of the military, and very often ignore their military advisers, forcing their children to join up wouldn’t solve that.
  6. although when el tone came out with "i'm prepared to pay the blood price" my first thoughts were is euan going to join up then? :twisted:
  7. A friend had a post in his Blog about Lt Ehren Watada - a google search later and I was speechless.

    Yes, we've had some British troops object as well - the RAF man you're referring to is a Doctor - not quite what part of the Hippocratic Oath he was invoking as a reason not to go.
  8. Yes, we're keeping a close eye on the soon-to-be-ex LT Watada. The Japanese-American veteran's organisations are extremely displeased to say the least.

    www.thankyoult.org for those who are ignorant.

  9. Good post and throws another side to the 'Death-Murder-Kill' coin.

    I think it goes along with the question, for me, of the morality of politicians sending troops to face death, when they've never been through the same. Up until Mrs Thatcher I think all PMs had been in the military. Not saying there weren't cock ups (Aden, Suez; by the politicians not soldiers).

    It's all too easy to commit to violence when you're fighting by proxy, with no real comprehension of the consequences, be it by cruise missile or by putting people through experiences of which you have no concept.

    Anyway, that's my thought for the day, gotta go and beat the wife now.
  10. Yes, that was the link I was reading!

    I wonder what the same people who support this officer would say if another officer who disapproved of President Clinton's actions had declined to obey any of his orders?
  11. How very sad.

    What would happen if he won. Could any soldier then in the middle of a firefight just decline his involvment because he now felt that it was illegal?

    Hamptons the lot of them.