Why are we promoting paedos

Status
Not open for further replies.
#1
Yesterday a convicted kiddie fiddler was promoted. Can anyone really hazard a guess as to why and if there arre any ways that we can try to taunt/torch/beat him until he runs away or dies. Interesting methods of torture also welcome. :x :x :x :x :x :x :x
 
#2
burnleybootboy said:
Yesterday a convicted kiddie fiddler was promoted. Can anyone really hazard a guess as to why and if there arre any ways that we can try to taunt/torch/beat him until he runs away or dies. Interesting methods of torture also welcome. :x :x :x :x :x :x :x
Who was he where was he is there any documented proof.
 
#4
Not sure if i can mention names on here but he did get promoted and it was int he sun. i know he was guilty like a little puppy sat next to a pile of poo.
 
#5
Shows how good his competition was then! Is paedophilism an accepted trait in your chip shop mob then, or is the 'paedo' tag unwarranted or unjust?
 
#6
FiveAlpha said:
Shows how good his competition was then! Is paedophilism an accepted trait in your chip shop mob then, or is the 'paedo' tag unwarranted or unjust?
by the sheer mention of chip shop i assume you know the ferral little creature then lol
 
#7
oh well if it was in the sun thats all the proof we need then....

bandwagon - check

Outrageometer - check

Truth - naaa, feck it, leave that behind.



if its in the public domain then is there a link to an article in the sun?
 
#8
theoriginalphantom said:
oh well if it was in the sun thats all the proof we need then....

bandwagon - check

Outrageometer - check

Truth - naaa, feck it, leave that behind.



if its in the public domain then is there a link to an article in the sun?
yes sorry mate forgot to mention that i saw the photos on his laptop and trust me bandwagon is not the word I would use .Seeing girls aged sevenish being f@cked by blokes was not on the top of my agenda that day i can tell you.
 
#9
burnleybootboy said:
theoriginalphantom said:
oh well if it was in the sun thats all the proof we need then....

bandwagon - check

Outrageometer - check

Truth - naaa, feck it, leave that behind.



if its in the public domain then is there a link to an article in the sun?
yes sorry mate forgot to mention that i saw the photos on his laptop and trust me bandwagon is not the word I would use .Seeing girls aged sevenish being f@cked by blokes was not on the top of my agenda that day i can tell you.
I assume you did something about this then? Do give us the info (with links if possible to the sun etc)
 
#10
burnleybootboy said:
theoriginalphantom said:
oh well if it was in the sun thats all the proof we need then....

bandwagon - check

Outrageometer - check

Truth - naaa, feck it, leave that behind.



if its in the public domain then is there a link to an article in the sun?
yes sorry mate forgot to mention that i saw the photos on his laptop and trust me bandwagon is not the word I would use .Seeing girls aged sevenish being f@cked by blokes was not on the top of my agenda that day i can tell you.
If as you say, you saw the pics and they were that serious, why did the courts martial not bin him from the army?
 
#11
i did mate hence the reason he is a convicted paedo. He recieved 5 years sex offenders and 1000 euro fine as well as two weeks off work for stress. I got fucked over for dropping certain officers in the sh!t . He was told to remove said images due to the fact some people might find them offensive. I then went straight to SIB cant find a link to the article however it wasn't I that wrote to the papers .
He did however reeive several beatings during his year tour down the Falklands
 
#12
fishfingers said:
burnleybootboy said:
theoriginalphantom said:
oh well if it was in the sun thats all the proof we need then....

bandwagon - check

Outrageometer - check

Truth - naaa, feck it, leave that behind.



if its in the public domain then is there a link to an article in the sun?
yes sorry mate forgot to mention that i saw the photos on his laptop and trust me bandwagon is not the word I would use .Seeing girls aged sevenish being f@cked by blokes was not on the top of my agenda that day i can tell you.
If as you say, you saw the pics and they were that serious, why did the courts martial not bin him from the army?


Good feckin question fingers pity I never thought of that before or since :?
 
#14
And now I heard on the jungle drums that the fecker is wanting a posting back to the scene of his crimes because his wife, who actually lied to the police for him saying she downloaded it by accident , lives local . You couldn't fecking write this sh!t I tell ya.
 

Biped

LE
Book Reviewer
#15
Someone provide me with a clicky please, my bore-ometer is going haywire . . .
 
#16
Thursday, March 18, 2004,The Sun
sorry mate cant do the link thingy but if you search this date it comes up
 
#18
I would like to point out that the individual was charged and dealt with in the appropriate fashion, by the appropriate authorities, at the time.

This is ARRSE, not a personal Army. If you're that cut up about not being promoted, write to your CO - do not involve us in your vendetta.

That is all.
 
#19
I don't to defend the person or what he was sentenced for but something doesn't quite add up here. He wasn't binned, deployed to op theatres, got promoted. Your previous post on the subject - separate forum- was locked by the moderators.
 
#20
sorry proximo i never said i was gutted about being promoted or not . That wasnt the issue and your reply was certainly one of an old boys network which seeemed to have been the problem in the first place. I don't want an Army as you put it but just being able to think that i am not the only one saddend by these events. Not releated to him r u ? sounds a bit touchy to me ah well
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Top