Dont know why they make that sound like a bad thing, if it were possible he was doing the jihad bit and might have went bang; surely jamming him in the bog would have reduced the risk to the public? Shouldnt they be more concerned about what happened to the original suspect?
It isnt the armed responce who got it wrong, they went by the SOP's by the sound of it, its the plain-clothes richard-cranium who was supoosed to ident the guy that have an interview without coffea and biscuits.
That's what first raised their concerns. He was then designated a security risk when he was observed "reading" and, as one dorsettian stated "moving around like a proper person and everything. Would you like to see my third hand?"