Who killed Jill Dando?
- Thread starter walt_of_the_walts
- Start date
Dando killer jailed for life
"He had learned about weapons after enlisting in the Territorial Army, and had also spent time at a local pistol club."
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/1409921.stm
msr
"He had learned about weapons after enlisting in the Territorial Army, and had also spent time at a local pistol club."
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/1409921.stm
msr
Ehh? So is that's okay then. The real killer is still at large, but as long as someone else serves the sentence, then thats alright? Proxy sentence serving? Is that a new HO initiative?
But actually, in the particular case of Bulsara/George, any country with a sane, rational sentencing policy would have him banged up anyway, as he is a danger to women, but is he a killer? I Don't know.
He did not have an obsession with Dando. That was a media invention
No murder weapon has been found
No DNA evidence links him to the scene.
Forensic evidence is doubtful, and the speck of firearms residue could have been down to the BF gun he owned or lab contamination. If he had shot her point blank he would have been covered with firearms residue, wouldnt he?
He's a nutter, who enjoyed the notoriety, and the case against him is circumstantial at best. He must have been a Godsend for the coppers investigating this case. A nutter who lives round the corner from the victim? Saves them going after after that 'Serbian gunmen' who might be a bit tasty with a shooter. After all they want to pick up their pensions at the end of it all!
If he did do it, we have yet to see the evidence.
But actually, in the particular case of Bulsara/George, any country with a sane, rational sentencing policy would have him banged up anyway, as he is a danger to women, but is he a killer? I Don't know.
He did not have an obsession with Dando. That was a media invention
No murder weapon has been found
No DNA evidence links him to the scene.
Forensic evidence is doubtful, and the speck of firearms residue could have been down to the BF gun he owned or lab contamination. If he had shot her point blank he would have been covered with firearms residue, wouldnt he?
He's a nutter, who enjoyed the notoriety, and the case against him is circumstantial at best. He must have been a Godsend for the coppers investigating this case. A nutter who lives round the corner from the victim? Saves them going after after that 'Serbian gunmen' who might be a bit tasty with a shooter. After all they want to pick up their pensions at the end of it all!
If he did do it, we have yet to see the evidence.
That is nothing more than a dead body, there is no evidence linking him to the crime in fact there is more evidence proving his innocence than guilt. Continuous fitting people to crimes doesnt work and smacks of filling targets which does justice to no one least of all the victim and her family. I think this will end in a high court with compensation whilst whoever the real killer was is long gone. yes he was a walt and possibly a danger to "society" but he didnt commit the crime and we will all look damn silly when he is released.
To be honest the police/media/public appeal for forensic help was poor and badly handled. It demonstrated a lack of knowledge and poor understanding! Not the first time I have encountered this either.
To be honest the police/media/public appeal for forensic help was poor and badly handled. It demonstrated a lack of knowledge and poor understanding! Not the first time I have encountered this either.
WTF?
You said:
And I am merely pointing out that someone has. I am not expressing an opinion on the strength or merits of the conviction, not least because I don't have an opinion on it.
Nonetheless, someone has been "banged up", rightly or wrongly, for killing Jill Dando, making your assertion incorrect.
FF.
You said:
walt_of_the_walts said:
No one has been banged up for killing Dando IMO 
Nonetheless, someone has been "banged up", rightly or wrongly, for killing Jill Dando, making your assertion incorrect.
FF.
There are a lot of people who are quite clear that whoever slotted Jill still walks free. Prosecution got a result but they were lucky.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/jilldando/story/0,,749230,00.html
Written 2002 and still valid questions.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/jilldando/story/0,,749230,00.html
Written 2002 and still valid questions.
Firstly, her defence - Mike Mansfield. Brilliant man with tremendous ability to introduce things likely to lead to reasonable doubt. The suggestion re a political motive is a fine example. Unless and until there is a established connection, all the stuff about a possible Serbian involvement is just column filler. There are many facets of her life that might attract some form of violent dissent - and that is just from the sensible people well before one considers the nutters and otherwise unbalanced.
There are surely miscarriages of justice. What we have here is a body of opinion saying 'I think the bloke is innocent' and then going on to suggest that someone else did it as a more likely alternative. Just read through and change Serbian for Man in Moon and one gets a "case". Just like saying "I think a ginger haired bloke did it. Becaused we know what gingers are capable of"
There are surely miscarriages of justice. What we have here is a body of opinion saying 'I think the bloke is innocent' and then going on to suggest that someone else did it as a more likely alternative. Just read through and change Serbian for Man in Moon and one gets a "case". Just like saying "I think a ginger haired bloke did it. Becaused we know what gingers are capable of"
Latest Threads
-
Looking for Hotel recommendations for a Reunion in Liverpool ??- Started by dazk55
- Replies: 0
-
-
News story: Defence Secretary invites D-Day veterans to 75th anniversary- Started by MoD_RSS
- Replies: 0
-
-
