Whitey Jackson looks closer to prison

Cutaway

LE
Kit Reviewer
#1
It seems that Placcy Jacky's denials might be as shaky as TCH's knowledge of Her Majestey's Armed Forces.

Having said that, the following report was first filed bt the National Enquirer...... :roll:

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/crime_file/story/260314p-222920c.html

New York Daily News said:
Nat'l Enquirer: Boy's prints on Jacko's porn stash

BY MICHELLE CARUSO
DAILY NEWS WEST COAST BUREAU CHIEF

Cops found Michael Jackson's fingerprint and a fingerprint from the boy accusing him of sex abuse on the "same page" of a porno mag seized from the pop star's home last year, according to a published report.
The fingerprints, allegedly found in a copy of Barely Legal magazine, could help bolster the boy's claim that Jackson used porno mags to get him aroused, according to a story in this week's National Enquirer.

Jackson, 46, is accused of molesting the then-13-year-old cancer survivor and conspiring to hold the boy and his family hostage at Neverland early last year. Jackson has pleaded not guilty to all charges.

The boy, who turned 15 on Dec. 2, told investigators Jackson kept a stash of porno mags in a briefcase in his bathroom. When cops searched Neverland in November 2003, they found the porn stash in that location, the Enquirer says.

At a recent court hearing, Santa Barbara County prosecutor Ron Zonen said "magazines" were part of the evidence against Jackson.

Barely Legal, which is published by Hustler mag honcho Larry Flynt, reportedly contains pictures of adult women dressed as saucy teenagers.

Jackson's lawyer Tom Mesereau and prosecutors are under a gag order and cannot comment on the case.

Cops raided Neverland for the second time Friday. They took photos and measurements of Jackson's home for use in creating trial exhibits, and a DNA sample from Jackson's mouth.

Cops also nosed around the ranch's telephone and communications systems, a source told the Daily News.

According to the Enquirer, investigators are trying to prove that from his bedroom, Jackson had the ability covertly to monitor and record phone conversations elsewhere on the ranch.

The trial is set to begin Jan. 31.
 
#2
Might as well face it, no matter how much proof is found and how bad the trial goes, the freak will buy his way out of incarceration. Good old US of A, the land of the free!
 
#3
"the freak will buy his way out of incarceration."

Scuse me while I bang my heed.
john
Serious time in open association is the only answer, Cons know how to deal with babay rapers.
 

maninblack

LE
Book Reviewer
#4
Based on music industry rumours this may well not be the case.

DUTY RUMOUR IS

Jackson received a large advance (I seem to remember $36 million being mentioned but I'm sure an internet search will reveal all) on his last album against which he offered a sureity, namely his section of the Beatles back catalogue.

The album sold 35 copies or some ridiculous amount which left Jackson owing the record company serious gelt.

The problem is that he had spent the said gelt propping up his lifestyle and private theme park.

If he goes down then his career is over and Sony (I believe) get the rights to The Beatles back catalogue for circa $36 million.

Bargain of the year.......isn't it strange how the record company are not investing in his defence?

I stress that this is merely an industry rumour not my theory.
 
#6
Shoot him.......guilty as charged.......however he could get OJs lawyers and accuse the cops of being racist......wait a minute......he was black but is now...... :?
 
E

error_unknown

Guest
#7
Who knows, going to nick could be gould for him-it would certainly widen his repertoire,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,ouch
 
#8
Yet another delay - will they ever get this man's arrse in prison let alone courrthouse (yes pun intended :wink: )

Jackson lawyers seeking long trial delay

SANTA MARIA, California (Reuters) - Michael Jackson's lawyers have asked for a lengthy delay to the start of his trial on child sex abuse, saying they need more time to go through some 22,000 pages of evidence.
The pop superstar's defence team will also ask again for the charges to be dismissed because of "outrageous government conduct" claiming that the chief prosecutor in the case conducted a personal witch hunt against Jackson.

Jackson, 46, was not in court for Monday's hearings and the judge is expected to rule on the defence requests later this week. Jackson's trial, on charges of lewd behaviour with a young boy at his Neverland Valley Ranch, plying him with alcohol and conspiring with his staff to cover up his actions, is scheduled to start on January 31.

Jackson, 46, has pleaded not guilty. On Friday he threw a party for 200 local children at Neverland, his theme park-style home in the foothills above Santa Barbara, California.

Prosecutors had been expected on Monday to have evidence of "prior sexual offences" by Jackson admitted at the trial. But that motion will now not be discussed until early January.

Jackson's lawyers on Monday asked for a delay of several months in the start of the trial, which is expected to take about four months once underway and could involve more than 150 witnesses.

They argued that the prosecution had been slow in turning over discovery material that needed analysis, and that its witness list included people who did not exist.

Later on Monday, the defence will argue that the entire case should be dismissed because Santa Barbara District Attorney Tom Sneddon had become carried away by his desire to bring down a celebrity.

Superior Court Judge Rodney Melville has already rejected a previous similar request seeking the removal of Sneddon.
http://www.reuters.co.uk/newsArticl...AELCFEY?type=entertainmentNews&storyID=641644
 
#9
MyssL said:
Yet another delay - will they ever get this man's arrse in prison let alone courrthouse (yes pun intended :wink: )

Jackson lawyers seeking long trial delay

SANTA MARIA, California (Reuters) - Michael Jackson's lawyers have asked for a lengthy delay to the start of his trial on child sex abuse, saying they need more time to go through some 22,000 pages of evidence.
The pop superstar's defence team will also ask again for the charges to be dismissed because of "outrageous government conduct" claiming that the chief prosecutor in the case conducted a personal witch hunt against Jackson.

Jackson, 46, was not in court for Monday's hearings and the judge is expected to rule on the defence requests later this week. Jackson's trial, on charges of lewd behaviour with a young boy at his Neverland Valley Ranch, plying him with alcohol and conspiring with his staff to cover up his actions, is scheduled to start on January 31.

Jackson, 46, has pleaded not guilty. On Friday he threw a party for 200 local children at Neverland, his theme park-style home in the foothills above Santa Barbara, California.

Prosecutors had been expected on Monday to have evidence of "prior sexual offences" by Jackson admitted at the trial. But that motion will now not be discussed until early January.

Jackson's lawyers on Monday asked for a delay of several months in the start of the trial, which is expected to take about four months once underway and could involve more than 150 witnesses.

They argued that the prosecution had been slow in turning over discovery material that needed analysis, and that its witness list included people who did not exist.

Later on Monday, the defence will argue that the entire case should be dismissed because Santa Barbara District Attorney Tom Sneddon had become carried away by his desire to bring down a celebrity.

Superior Court Judge Rodney Melville has already rejected a previous similar request seeking the removal of Sneddon.
http://www.reuters.co.uk/newsArticl...AELCFEY?type=entertainmentNews&storyID=641644
1. If the prosecution case were truly nothing but a malevolent fiction, the defendant would have his remedy in the form of a motion to dismiss, at the preliminary examination, for failure to show a prima facie case. As far as I know (and I admit I haven't followed this milestone of jurisprudence very closely), the defense brought no such motion.

2. The notion, which this article seems to imply, that a motion to dismiss can be based on the proposition that the prosecutor is an overly ambitious SOB, is fanciful. The subjective yearnings of the prosecutor are both unknowable and irrelevant. All that matters is whether the charge can be proved.

3. Prosecutorial gamesmanship, such as knowingly listing fictitious persons in the witness list, can be (and typically is) dealt with by sanctions less drastic than dismissing the indictment or complaint. The public, in whose name the prosecution is brought, has an interest in both the acquittal of the innocent and the conviction of the guilty. That interest shouldn't lightly be flouted because of the (assumed) misconduct of one man, the prosecutor.

4. Motions, by one party, to disqualify the lawyer representing the other party, are rare, but not completely unprecedented.

Typically, the movant must either show:

1) That the targeted lawyer either is, or ought to be a witness to a material issue of contested fact. The court won't condone the unseemly spectacle of counsel urging his own credibility in closing argument.

2) That the targeted lawyer has a conflict of interest insofar as he represented the opposing party in some earlier, related matter. The law won't allow a disgraceful situation in which a man finds himself opposed by his own faithless, professional confidence-breaching former lawyer.

Neither of those considerations seem to be involved here.

The idea that a prosecutor (or any other lawyer) should be disqualified from appearing in the case merely because he's too ambitious (in the opinion of his adversary) is as novel as it is baseless.

I conclude that Mr. Jackson's defense team has decided to string this thing along for as long as possible.
 
#10
Not_Whistlin_Dixie said:
I conclude that Mr. Jackson's defense team has decided to string this thing along for as long as possible.
No matter how long it takes the case is going to be a real THRILLER

The plastic peado ain't going to moonwalk his way out of this one.
 
#11
BlackHand said:
Not_Whistlin_Dixie said:
I conclude that Mr. Jackson's defense team has decided to string this thing along for as long as possible.
No matter how long it takes the case is going to be a real THRILLER

The plastic peado ain't going to moonwalk his way out of this one.
Or do a OJ and BEAT IT?.... Ok, :roll: I get me coat......
 

Latest Threads

New Posts