White House Told Within 2 Hours of Benghazi Attack that Terrorists Claimed Credit For

Discussion in 'The Intelligence Cell' started by jumpinjarhead, Oct 24, 2012.

Welcome to the Army Rumour Service, ARRSE

The UK's largest and busiest UNofficial military website.

The heart of the site is the forum area, including:

  1. I'm sorry JJH. You know from my earlier posts that I am not a rabid anti-Septic, and I admire you for your normally balanced views of life across the pond, but what should he have done?

    I suppose he should have fabricated intelligence, sent a bloody good man to the UN to commit political suicide by claiming that the other side had weapons of mass destruction on the behalf of his manipulative vice president and his business interests, and then conned a close ally (not difficult, it must be said) into adding respectability to his actions by commiting itself to an unwinnable war. He could then have claimed "Mission Accomplished" and ignored the carnage that went on afterwards. That would at least have been acceptable to the Republican-leaning voters and politicians.

    I apologise for my possible shortsightedness, but I really can't see anything beyond a political/intelligence/PR breakdown of communication that had extremely regretable consequences for a relatively small number of people. As I have said in an earlier, separate thread, it all pales into insignificance against what President Cheney did for us all, and what that expert on foreign affairs Mitt Romney would end up doing.

    I suppose you will now take me off you invitation list for a range day sometime in the future! :). Take care!
    • Like Like x 2
  2. Only the foolish act on single source reporting whose reliability cannot be judged. Often groups claim responsibility for things they haven't done. Anyway what do you think Obama should have done?
    • Like Like x 1
  3. Repeating the lie often enough that this attack was some Obama conspiracy doesn't make it the truth.

    Your single minded obsession to blame all the ills of the Universe on President Obama is making you look foolish and just a tad unhinged.

    • Like Like x 1
  4. As opposed to? Leading a posse to Libya in person to hunt down the bad guys? Crushing his prick between two bricks in mortification and in empathy with the deceased? Ordering a bombing run on some randomly-chosen bit of geography and whatever poor bastards lived there?
    • Like Like x 1
  5. I thought he stood on the White house lawn and made a statement about it! thre president has "generals" to sort out stuff, and the fact he went to bed, doesnt mean he slept easy.
  6. Perhaps he could have taken a leaf out of Bush the Youngers script and carried on reading 'My little goat' as planes were being crashed into tall buildings killing thousands in New York live on breakfast TV?

  7. Id be going straight to bed if I knew Mrs O was waiting to suck me off!
    • Like Like x 2
  8. The Economist had a good slant on this last week: The town-hall debate: The utterly useless Benghazi argument | The Economist

    It's clearly an attempt to do an Iran Hostage Crisis-style October Surprise on Obama, whether it makes sense or not. One could argue that the administration can be faulted for lax security in Benghazi, or for having their No1 there at a time of growing tension etc etc... but this? It's nonsense, and it reeks of a desperate need to find offence in something for political ends... in an oddly similar way to the Muslim protestors themselves.
  9. Its beginning to sound like an updated version of Swiftboating
  10. CplFoodspoiler

    CplFoodspoiler War Hero Book Reviewer

    Originally Posted by jumpinjarhead
    Adding insult to injury, He went to bed after the news and the next day carried on with His campaigning.

    Point of interest JJH, did Romney pause his campaigning?

    Hottest First Lady ever, two's up!
  11. "Clearly?" I admire your certitude. I think the fact Reuters and other such "news" sources are reporting these developments demonstrates this is not new political election season theater.

    As I have said before on this matter (and you can believe what you want as to the honesty of my motives which in this case--posting on ARRSE--are focused on not letting the apparently preventable deaths become lost in partisan bickering), 4 Americans are dead and the answers we are getting about the entire affair are at best unsettling. This is so regardless of the obvious and to be expected political dimension (one can but imagine the different treatment a conservative administration would be getting in the "press").

    One can but wonder how my British cousins would react if the earlier assassination attempt on your ambassador had succeeded or if the warning signs of impending trouble were ignored as they apparently were in this case in order to fit a "pie in the sky" political template (the evil Christians made a film that in turn "made" the Muslim street riot) that Al Qaeda was defeated.
    • Like Like x 1
  12. You misunderstand me, I assume unintentionally. As I said, there's much to criticise in the Benghazi incident, but when and whether your president called it 'terrorism' isn't it. It's this weird semantic rabbithole the GOP are clambering down that seems so baffling from the outside: I presume it's a dog-whistle thing, but we're on a different frequency. And if you genuinely think this is unrelated to your ongoing election, then, well... shrug.

    As for it being AQ, rather than a local affiliate or wannabe, I've not seen any proof of that. If you have, you should probably forward it to the State Dept rather than moan about it here. And regarding claiming that AQ were defeated, who in your administration did that? If anyone did, they're an idiot, but your post clearly implies this was the case.
  13. You are a sick, sick man.:puker:

    Most Nerds fantasize about Princess Leia in The Gold Bikini. Not a woman who looks like Chewbacca after an all-over Brazilian.:omg:
    • Like Like x 2
  14. Racist, Mods ban that man.