Simple question, Kyle, Vine, Clarkson or Paxman, i find them all equally irritating. Kyle is probably least worst, at least he treats the scumbags on his show with utter contempt, however he has encouraged a whole generation that it's cool to go on telly and tell the nation that you have 8 kids from 9 fathers, are a recovering addict, and that you still love dwayne, wayne etc. Vine is a smug tw@t who, with his gormless listeners are nothing more than an audio version of the Daily Mail. Why does he appear at the start and end of Panorama, he adds no value. Clarkson - spare me. He is a one trick pony who has turned a once decent motor-journalist show into car-crash TV (literally). Who cars about racing bathtubs with 500bhp engines down the thames towing a caravan, or powered unicycles round antartica - utter waste of licence payers money. Paxman - granted his interview with Michael Howard stillmildly amuses me,he has the demeanour of somebody i would like to punch, very hard. He irritated me when he took Gen Kisley on last yr, and less said about university challenge the better. So cast your vote and make me feel better!!!