I was referring only to the circumstance previously described, of someone not 'signed in', who would not be claiming MTDs and would therefore not be paid in that particular instance. Therefore not a casual worker engaged and 'under control' of the MoD.Consideration does not have to be "pay". And we do get paid.
In short, these are all the really tricky issues that the government has to overcome through proper legislative changes, that cut through the uncertainty and unreasonableness of the relationship. TA - 'casual worker', not employee as defined in 96 Act cited by Duke, and not even 'contracted' on a zero hours contract, because no 'statement of particulars' exists. AR 'future' - to be part time employees with TACOS scaled down but aligned to Reg TACOS (including pension rigts) to facilitate commitment as an employee on flexible terms. Will we ever get there?