What Would The Lovely Kira Cochrane Make of This....??

#1
LittleJohn

Talking about "The People's Prostitues....."

Ooops......!!

Kira's probably going mental. Have a read. Like him or loathe him - he certainly doesn't pull his punches.......!!!
 
#3
he's only saying what Moody said...has he been reading ARRSE as well as Kira Cocks-run????
 
#4
Sven said:
How can we expect anything less from the Daily Hate
HAHAHAH.......

You must be a communist, or a gayer.......??? Or a gay communist....??

I like the Mail - It panders to my irrational phobias and prejudices.

Littlejohn for PM...........!!

Clarkson for Deputy…………!!
 
#6
Santa_Sunday said:
Sven said:
How can we expect anything less from the Daily Hate
HAHAHAH.......

You must be a communist, or a gayer.......??? Or a gay communist....??

I like the Mail - It panders to my irrational phobias and prejudices.

Littlejohn for PM...........!!

Clarkson for Deputy…………!!
Apparently I work for Number 10 - so I'd be a Tory then
 
#10
The only kind of missionary position they undertook was in the back seat of a car.
and

but in the scheme of things the deaths of these five women is no great loss.
Ouch
 

Fugly

ADC
DirtyBAT
#11
I mourn the loss of a mother, and a daughter.

I don't mourn the loss of a drug-addled whore.

Its just a pity the two happen to be the same, therefore conflict will always arise from this, and a compromise will never be reached.
 
#12
MODs,

Is there any particular reason why this has been moved into The ARRSE Hole.

Is it Littlejohn you object to......?? Why is this worthy of 'The ARRSE Hole' treatment yet a thread on the same subject (vaguely at least) that has turned into page after page of personal 'slagging' remanis...??

Heads up please...........
 
#13
Come on Santa, let's not play the "What did I do card"?

What does Kira Cochrane have to do with this? Just a bandwagon exercise by you wasn't it? Look at the replies on the thread before I moved it.

Furthermore, did you fail to notice the other thread on this episode in Current Affairs is locked?

It's locked, because some Arrses just can't resist a virtual 'dirty protest' , in spite of repeated requests , post edits and warnings. As I warned, the thread was locked.

Curious that the Punternet thread hasn't been touched. So I assume some people were more interested in smearing virtual sh*t up the walls and over themselves and people who didn't agree with them in Current Affairs, than they were in actually having a serious debate on the matter?

This is in the Arrsehole, because in my opinion as the Current Affairs moderator, it was a bandwaggoning exercise by you, as subsequent posts seem to bear out.

PTP
 
#14
PartTimePongo said:
Come on Santa, let's not play the "What did I do card"? Can you be any more patronising..??

What does Kira Cochrane have to do with this? Because Littlejohn 'quoted' The Guardian. You know - the paper Kira Cochrane works for..??Just a bandwagon exercise by you wasn't it? Not at all. I was highighting another Journalists's view on the biggest news story of the moment. It would appear you haven't even read Littlejohn's artilce before moving this thread Look at the replies on the thread before I moved it.

Furthermore, did you fail to notice the other thread on this episode in Current Affairs is locked?Clearly I did.

It's locked, because some Arrses just can't resist a virtual 'dirty protest' , in spite of repeated requests , post edits and warnings. As I warned, the thread was locked.

Curious that the Punternet thread hasn't been touched.Ask the other MODs why that stayed - How should I know..?? So I assume some people were more interested in smearing virtual sh*t up the walls and over themselves and people who didn't agree with them in Current Affairs, than they were in actually having a serious debate on the matter?

This is in the Arrsehole, because in my opinion moderation may well be about opinion - It doesn't necessarily mean you're right though. as the Current Affairs moderator, it was a bandwaggoning exercise by you Wrong, as subsequent posts seem to bear out. How...?? One person made reference to The Daily Hate. Hardly 'bears it out', does it..??

If you are so sure that this was inappropriate in this Forum, why not just move it into the NAAFI....??? Most other moderators would have. Take your Jackboots off.....

PTP
 
#15
Can you be any more patronising..??
Could your post header be more inciteful? Don't play the innocent Santa.

Because Littlejohn 'quoted' The Guardian. You know - the paper Kira Cochrane works for..
He quoted

The gormless Guardianistas simply refuse to confront this blindingly obvious reality.
A sub-class of softies he refers to, by classifying them as readers of the paper. He doesn't actually refer to the Guardian as far as I can see. Journalists are very careful when it comes to smearing one of their own I notice.

Furthermore, did you fail to notice the other thread on this episode in Current Affairs is locked?Clearly I did.
But by your own admission were aware of the thread. Why start another one, if you hadn't realised that one was locked? Surely you'd have a look at the 26 page marathon thread first?

Ask the other MODs why that stayed - How should I know..??
Perhaps I could have phrased that better, but I would have thought my further comments illustrated my point. There is another thread on the subject running in the Naafi, where people can happily name-call and behave in a beastly fashion around this topic. But surprisingly , most, if not all the additional posts are mergers by me out of the Current Affairs thread.

moderation may well be about opinion - It doesn't necessarily mean you're right though
Indeed . However in this case, my opinion was formed by multiple deletions, editing, merged posts and disregarded warnings on the locked Current Affairs thread, and the content of the existing Naafi thread which refers to the Journalist in question. Taking these two factors into consideration formed my opinion, on the likely direction a thread with a title such as this , and the early contributions made would take.

Because of the precedent set by the existing threads, and the form this one was already starting to take, the thread was moved here.

it was a bandwaggoning exercise by you Wrong,
Then why use the name of the Journalist who is currently getting a torrid time here, and the sobriquet 'Lovely' save to incite? A bandwagoning exercise.

How...?? One person made reference to The Daily Hate. Hardly 'bears it out', does it..??
You seem to have adopted a Nelsonian touch to ;

has he been reading ARRSE as well as Kira Cocks-run????
and

HAHAHAH.......

You must be a communist, or a gayer.......??? Or a gay communist....??

I like the Mail - It panders to my irrational phobias and prejudices.
Hardly the sort of post I'd expect from someone hoping to have an illuminating and educated debate on the subject

and

I put my life on the line due to my work, so did they so fcku em'.
and

Some kind of pie probably, if she could find a way.
I think it 'bears it out' more than adequately.

If you are so sure that this was inappropriate in this Forum, why not just move it into the NAAFI....???
Why should I give the Naafi mods even more work , when there are already 2 threads running on the subject there?

Most other moderators would have. Take your Jackboots off.....
I can't speak for other Mods, and what they would have done.

PTP
 
#16
Pongo

Could your post header be more inciteful? Don't play the innocent Santa
This patronising lark comes REALLY easy to you, doesn't it?

You must be a communist, or a gayer.......??? Or a gay communist....??

I like the Mail - It panders to my irrational phobias and prejudices.

Littlejohn for PM...........!!

Clarkson for Deputy…………!!
That is called irony.

Then why use the name of the Journalist who is currently getting a torrid time here, and the sobriquet 'Lovely' save to incite?
You're a tlttle 'touchy' to be a moderator on a military website, are you not..?

You seem to have adopted a Nelsonian touch to
Nope - I've got 2 good eyes and have read all the other posts on this issue. I linked one journo to another - that's all. You got all 'mummsie' when other threads are allowed to descend into farce. Maybe this would have - who knows..??

Actually, I can't be arrsed to reply to the rest of your retort. This 'cut and paste' lark is too dull.

You win Pogo - as I suspect you usually do. I'm not the first ARRSER that you have 'ticked off' in you headmasterly fashion and I know I won't be the last. I think I'll stay clear of your forums in future. I know that's what you would want too.........

Out to you.
 

Latest Threads

Top