Army Rumour Service

Register a free account today to join our community
Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site, connect with other members through your own private inbox and will receive smaller adverts!

What now for the EU ?

Status
Not open for further replies.
The Welsh are they never happy? . All those speeding Irish trucks off uk roads,less pollution less damage to the roads as well .....Personally, I am quite happy to see those Irish trlucks bypass the land bridge (cost more money to do that anyway, (even if the EU is subsidising the ferries , they are pcking up the bill , not us )
I’m wondering how much trade (and what sort) Wales is losing out on as a result of any new sea-routes between Eire and the continent?

Diesel sales? Overpriced service-station pasties? Tourist income from HGV drivers stopping off to see the sights? Bolt-cropper sales due to fewer overnight lay-by opportunities?

What is the economc damage to Wales resulting from fewerHGV driving across Wales?
 
I’m wondering how much trade (and what sort) Wales is losing out on as a result of any new sea-routes between Eire and the continent?

Diesel sales? Overpriced service-station pasties? Tourist income from HGV drivers stopping off to see the sights? Bolt-cropper sales due to fewer overnight lay-by opportunities?

What is the economc damage to Wales resulting from fewerHGV driving across Wales?

I would imagine almost zero: why would a trucker stop in Wales? They've had a shít on the boat and won't need to stop until Dover.

The Tunnel may see a loss of business, but hey, they're French so it's all good news!
 
I’m wondering how much trade (and what sort) Wales is losing out on as a result of any new sea-routes between Eire and the continent?

Diesel sales? Overpriced service-station pasties? Tourist income from HGV drivers stopping off to see the sights? Bolt-cropper sales due to fewer overnight lay-by opportunities?

What is the economc damage to Wales resulting from fewerHGV driving across Wales?

Wales loses absolutely nothing other than potentially port fees (mostly at Holyhead)

Paddy Scania Man does not stop in Wales or spend any money there, they buy neither fuel nor pasties.
No loss in revenue and considerably less road wear/congestion

Speaking as a resident of North Wales and an HGV Operator in North Wales, the less Irish trucks coming through Holyhead bound for europe the happier I am. There is no downside that I can see.
 
Not using the landbridge has two consequences for the Irish, it takes longer & it costs more. @jagman2 did some back of an envelope calculations a few months ago.


I did but it was a while ago, I would like to think that he Irish govrenment will have done a lot of work on reducing the ferry costs since then but I haven't checked. I believe they were looking at a substantial subsidy for the ferry costs

If memeory serves me rightly when first introduced the alternate ferry route would have cost Ireland around £50 (or Euros, can't remember) per pallet more than using the UK landbridge

I'd have to dredge it out or work it all out again

The large unseen cost increase was down to the drop in productivity
I think I worked it out that each Irish lorry using the direct ferry route lost one day of productive work (20%) per week due to time lost on the ferry

Of course Mr Paddy Scania Operator won't be abusing workint time directive and tachograph rules whilst his drivers are on the ferry obviously
 
Published by: Frank Furedi, SP!KED, on 11 October 2021.

Why we must stand with Poland

For democracy to flourish in Europe the powers of the EU must be rolled back.


Poland is in the crosshairs of the European Union, after Poland’s top court committed the unforgivable sin of taking its nation’s sovereignty seriously.

As far as the EU’s political masters are concerned, EU law must prevail over national law. Poland’s Constitutional Tribunal disagrees. It ruled last Thursday that some parts of EU law are incompatible with the Polish constitution, and that the constitution trumps the rulings of Brussels’ highest courts. In effect, the Constitutional Tribunal has directly challenged the supremacy of EU law.

By doing so, the Polish judiciary has called into question the EU’s federalist project. After all, the survival of this project depends on the willingness of all member states to ‘pool’ their sovereignty in the EU, and to adhere to the laws enacted by its institutions. In effect, this means each member state trades off national sovereignty in exchange for the supposed benefits of being a member of a large federalist bloc. This trading off, this sharing of sovereignty, endows the EU and its leaders with formidable political powers. And it robs national political and legal institutions of the powers they need to defend and promote their citizens’ interests.

In recent decades, the EU oligarchy has done its best to undermine the principle of national sovereignty by associating it with aggressive and extreme nationalism. In 2010, Herman Van Rompuy, the then president of the European Council, called nationalism dangerous and national sovereignty a ‘lie’ (1).

Unsurprisingly, the EU has been quick to attack the Polish court’s assertion of national sovereignty. Ursula von der Leyen, the president of the European Commission, says she is ‘deeply concerned’ by the ruling. ‘The EU is a community of values and laws’, she continues. ‘We will uphold the founding principles of the EU’s legal order. Our utmost priority is to ensure that the rights of Polish citizens are protected.’

Von der Leyen’s imperious language reveals her neocolonial contempt for the right of a national court to rule on matters that affect its people. Her assertion that the EU’s ‘priority is to ensure that the rights of Polish citizens are protected’ is a roundabout way of asserting the EU’s right to interfere in Polish domestic affairs.

Numerous pro-EU politicians have been quick to raise the stakes. They claim that unless Poland toes the line, it will have to leave the EU. German foreign minister Heiko Maas says Poland must ‘fully and completely’ implement EU law, while France’s Europe minister, Clément Beaune, calls the ruling an ‘attack against the EU’.

Luxembourg’s foreign minister, Jean Asselborn, claims that Poland has put the very existence of the EU in jeopardy. ‘The primacy of European law is essential for the integration of Europe and living together in Europe’, he says. ‘If this principle is broken, Europe as we know it, as it has been built with the Rome treaties, will cease to exist.’

Asselborn and his colleagues rightly see Poland’s assertion of national sovereignty as a direct threat to the survival of the EU in its present form. In many ways, the challenge to the EU posed by Poland’s Constitutional Tribunal is no less important than that posed by Brexit.

Poland, however, does not want to leave the EU. It only wants to affirm the primacy of Polish laws within its borders. Whether or not it can maintain this stance in the face of EU pressure is far from clear. The EU will do its best to isolate the Polish government and mobilise domestic opposition against it. To this end, it will no doubt attempt to scare the Polish people about the high economic price they will pay if they allow their institutions to continue to defy the EU.

Now more than ever, Poland needs the support of democratically minded people throughout Europe. For democracy to flourish the imperial ambitions of EU federalism must be rolled back. We must show Poland that it does not stand alone.

[Frank Furedi’s 100 Years of Identity Crisis: Culture War over Socialisation is published by De Gruyter].

(1) Populism and the Culture Wars In Europe, by Frank Furedi, Routledge, 2018, p16.

poland-flag-1536x864.jpg



Posted on the "uk-european-migrant-problem" thread (See post #28,508, over there), and also on this "What now for the EU" thread.
 
I was struck on Euronews last night about how the EU views the Polish actions on their border with Belorus. No one was actually calling for the Beloruss to have humanitarian aspects on their side of the border and they were bemoaning that fact that NGO'S VOLUNTEERS could not get through to give assistance. That to me says it all in a nutshell. Brussels the arbiter of immigration rules ad nauseam, despite having accused Belorus of using the border as a ruse, expect Poland to foot the bill. I don't agree with all aspects of Poland's position re the Law and order issue, the control of courts but this is the EU's weak point and it will fall on it.
 
He He He

No idea if this is true - But it made me chuckle

France’s failure to secure the backing of European governments in its battle against Britain over fishing licences has prompted fresh threats of a Channel trade blockade by angry French trawlermen.

EU Unity & Harmony at it's finest :) :)

Emmanuel Macron, the French president, was diplomatically humiliated last week when EU nations poured cold water over his attempts to use the post-Brexit trade deal to slap the UK with economic sanctions.

What a sad, pathetic excuse for a human being.

 
France’s failure to secure the backing of European governments in its battle against Britain over fishing licences has prompted fresh threats of a Channel trade blockade by angry French trawlermen.

Let’s get real here. It’s in France’s interest to control the market here, so where does that leave the Dutch and Spanish. Different types of fishing I know. But all the recipient country cares about is where they get their goods from. If the goods don’t land in France, they can’t be controlled there. It goes back to first principles, they buy them elsewhere. All the EU says is they must conform to EU hygiene standards.These countries are in the EU, they’re responsible for monitoring those controls. End of!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top