Yet again another Graculus switch 'n' bait tactic, this time no 3:
Swerve the point that demolished his original statement and hope that his dummy is bought and the OP dashes past thus muffing the tackle.
Judiciaries are not unique to democracies, however, they are especially beloved by dictatorships for the veneer of legality and aura of respectability they afford such regimes; laws though have been endemic across all known forms of human societies --- judiciaries have not.
A judiciary decides on points of law, old boy. in the U.K. they are appointed; they stand in place of and represent the Sovereign; they do not stand for election therefore as they are unelected one consequence of such is that they are not allowed to sit and legislate or form the executive. (Notwithstanding the Supreme Court's actions over Brexit, for which their comeuppance is well deserved and mightily overdue.) Their function is to decide if a law --- any law that is extant --- has been broken making something illegal, or if something whilst not illegal might still be unlawful, meaning it's not authorised.
Sad, sad, sad little armorer, trying so hard to get back at the world for all those nasty taunts in the mess from those brutes of mechs and fitters, nay, even from the snowdrops. I shall light a candle for you and pray for your wizened, shrivelled self-respect.