That was also the rationale in the UK - the state pension scheme as becoming increasingly unaffordable to to an aging population, unrealistic pension increases to woe the 'grey vote' and a birth rate tha.t was too low. So the immigration floodgates were opened to provide a wave of new, young tax payers who would help pay the pensions of the retired.
I think there was also an attempt at gerrymandering by Labour. who saw low paid, unskilled economic migrants as more likely to vote Labour than Tory.
This was the classic example of politicians trying for short term gain and kicking the
problem tin can down the road for someone else to solve in the next parliament.
- It was trumpeted how these economic migrants were boosting the UK's workforce, but everyone studiously avoided mentioning the extra pressure it put in the heath service, schools, prisons, and so on.
- It was said that economic migrants were contributing to the UK's tax base - while ignoring they had dependent's who were claiming benefits.
- As many of these economic migrants were unskilled and willing to work for crap wages, they forced our home grown unskilled workers out of the job market.
- UK companies became reliant on cheap labour rather than investing in automation - the long term way forward.
- Many of these economic migrants never integrated into British society, but preferred to live in their own communities / ghettoes.
All things that eventually contributed to the Brexit vote in the UK - and to rising tensions in the EU.
And the second shoe has yet to drop. When all these economic migrants - who were allowed into the UK to help pay for the existing pensions for the retired hit retirement age themselves, they will want their pensions paid too - by which time the magic money tree will have shed its leaves.
Widespread economic migration has been/will be a disaster for the UK.
Wordsmith