pimpernel
LE

Interesting dress sense, is he ex Cav!I like him.
Interesting dress sense, is he ex Cav!I like him.
I like him.
It appears not, but what a great working life as historian to the Tank museum. Thats what I call loving your work.Interesting dress sense, is he ex Cav!
One of dads Cpls in his first Sapper troop had been a bulldozer driver at Belsen for the clear up which haunted him for the rest of his life. He was never tasked with the digging of tank scrapes because of his traumatic memories.
I found this that gives a bit more substance to the horror of the task. I know its the Sun Dad drove a bulldozer at Belsen ... it haunted him until day he died
I believe US forces had no interest in Hobart's Funnies for their own landings. can someone elaborate?
Yes, it was apparently a combination of being launched too far out and then being side-on to the waves, due to trying to maintain their position in a cross-current. One theory I've read is that the British DDs did better because they were sailing on compass-bearings and thus stayed at 90 degrees to the shore and kept their sterns into the waves. The US DDs were apparently going on visual references such as church spires, so as they kept their bow pointed at the target, they presented their weak side-screens to the waves coming in behind them.I believe the Yanks used the swimming Shermans but launched them to far out and slightly of course rather large waves swamped all of them. The is some where on YouTube a short documentary on where divers found them all.
Yes, it was apparently a combination of being launched too far out and then being side-on to the waves, due to trying to maintain their position in a cross-current. One theory I've read is that the British DDs did better because they were sailing on compass-bearings and thus stayed at 90 degrees to the shore and kept their sterns into the waves. The US DDs were apparently going on visual references such as church spires, so as they kept their bow pointed at the target, they presented their weak side-screens to the waves coming in behind them.
One of the dumbest things I ever did was give these books away to a buddy when I moved 4 years ago. I figured a replacement would be cheap and easy to sourceBeat me to it.
Free download here: Vanguard of Victory The 79th Armoured Division Hobart's Funnies WWII Specialised Armour | | download
Also available as a PDF download hereBy the power of greyskull, (eBay) WW2 History of the 79th Armoured Division -reprint rare signed book 1945 RAC RTR | eBay
It was horrific enough as a youngster just seeing the bulldozers doing that during the episode of ‘World at War’.
Certainly remember watching the original programme Bob it was probably my first introduction to the horrors of the "final solution".
The series is being repeated at the moment but they no longer show that scene - and you can see why.
Didn't put me off a couple of years later joining the Corps as a planty though.
Plant op eh?
Hence the ‘Ming’ in your user name no doubt
Mind you, could have been worse, you could have been the Pod Op...![]()
I don't think so, most of the armour was Sherman and of limited value as they couldn't really leave the roadways on the dikes. Due to the defensive flooding by the Germans and the pre-offensive flooding of Walcheren by Allied bombers most of OP Infatuate was Infantry led. Landings were made by Buffalo (Canadian versions of the American LVT's), DUKW and (in the case of 4SSB) conventional landing craft. The AVRE which Bobbin was attached to would have been to large and heavy for Buffalo in any case. The following photo's don't seem to show DD Shermans, there is some flamethrower 'action', which may well have been Wasps....
In addition to the ARKs, which were held in relatively small numbers, any AVRE could carry an 'SBG' (Small Box Girder) Bridge, once counterweights and a winch had been fitted to the rear of the vehicle. These were frequently used throughout 1944-45, as were fascines. Bobbins however, don't seem to have been used much, if at all after D-Day, though perhaps they were used at Walcheren?
...
No, they didn't use DDs at Walcheren, though they did land some AVREs and Crabs directly from LCTs at Westkapelle. By the way, that's a lovely shot of an SBG bridge sticking up at the back of that LCT!I don't think so, most of the armour was Sherman and of limited value as they couldn't really leave the roadways on the dikes. Due to the defensive flooding by the Germans and the pre-offensive flooding of Walcheren by Allied bombers most of OP Infatuate was Infantry led. Landings were made by Buffalo (Canadian versions of the American LVT's), DUKW and (in the case of 4SSB) conventional landing craft. The AVRE which Bobbin was attached to would have been to large and heavy for Buffalo in any case. The following photo's don't seem to show DD Shermans, there is some flamethrower 'action', which may well have been Wasps.
View attachment 534339
View attachment 534340
View attachment 534341
View attachment 534342
ETA - also found this, it's unclear which OP the photo is from though, only part of the Scheldt Estuary landings.
View attachment 534348
Fletcher states that it's on Walcheren.**SNIP**
ETA - also found this, it's unclear which OP the photo is from though, only part of the Scheldt Estuary landings.
View attachment 534348
Sorry, @OneTenner, it's beginning to look as though I've got it in for you!I don't think so, most of the armour was Sherman and of limited value as they couldn't really leave the roadways on the dikes. Due to the defensive flooding by the Germans and the pre-offensive flooding of Walcheren by Allied bombers most of OP Infatuate was Infantry led. Landings were made by Buffalo (Canadian versions of the American LVT's), DUKW and (in the case of 4SSB) conventional landing craft. The AVRE which Bobbin was attached to would have been to large and heavy for Buffalo in any case. The following photo's don't seem to show DD Shermans, there is some flamethrower 'action', which may well have been Wasps.
**SNIP**
No WW2 LVT's were made in Canada the series was made in the USASorry, @OneTenner
1. LVT called "Water Buffalo" in US service; in British service "Buffalo" in 21 AG and "Fantail" in 8 Army (Italy)
2. I'd be interested in your source for the Canadian provenance of these vehicles. Futter* states "The majority were manufactured by various plants of the Food Machinery Corporation and by Graham-Paige Motor Corporation of Detroit and the St. Louis Car Company."