WHAT A NUMPTY

#3
class :D
 
A

ALVIN

Guest
#5
This man is living a double life, he is probebley mentaly ill, probebley bi polor disorder. The questian now being ------- Is mental illness a defence in this mans case ?
 
#7
I just love reading 'a police officer has been arrested'!
 
#9
ALVIN said:
This man is living a double life, he is probebley mentaly ill, probebley bi polor disorder. The questian now being ------- Is mental illness a defence in this mans case ?
No, as his behaviour in this context is not a symptom of bipolar disorder or any other mental health problem ('The voice in my head told me to be a football hooligan'....don't think so), unless you class being a football hooligan as a mental illness.

Difficult to see how he will get off this unless GMP have the wrong chap...
 
#10
Help make our community safer...

errr... keep police off the streets (some mistake surely, Ed) :D
 
#11
That is what watching ID too many times will do to you!
 
#12
is this the real reason why plod want us to stop taking pictures of them?
 
A

ALVIN

Guest
#13
psychobabble said:
ALVIN said:
This man is living a double life, he is probebley mentaly ill, probebley bi polor disorder. The questian now being ------- Is mental illness a defence in this mans case ?
No, as his behaviour in this context is not a symptom of bipolar disorder or any other mental health problem ('The voice in my head told me to be a football hooligan'....don't think so), unless you class being a football hooligan as a mental illness.

Difficult to see how he will get off this unless GMP have the wrong chap...
Ahhh yes fair point, but on the other hand 99.9 % of football hooligans are not policemen :!: If i were the judge, i would certanly ask for psycriatric reports before sentencing :!:
 
#14
TIGER-MONKEY said:
is this the real reason why plod want us to stop taking pictures of them?
I have my own tin foil theory about that.

Quick question.

Seeing as it has just become illigal to photograph/film plod going about their 'duties',would incriminating film of plod still be admissable as evidence to a court of law?

Where does the law stand on CCTV footage?

Im thinking specifically in regards to use of force.
 
A

ALVIN

Guest
#15
insert-coin-here said:
TIGER-MONKEY said:
is this the real reason why plod want us to stop taking pictures of them?
I have my own tin foil theory about that.

Quick question.

Seeing as it has just become illigal to photograph/film plod going about their 'duties',would incriminating film of plod still be admissable as evidence to a court of law?

Where does the law stand on CCTV footage?

Im thinking specifically in regards to use of force.
Any in criminating film recorded by anyone involving the police would absolutly be accepted in a court of law, this is because the police themselfes are NOT above the law :!: -------------and quite rightly so. 8)
 
#16
Next thing you know, the rest of the violent rabble will be claiming that the caught copper led them on, so now they will get off!

They're all nutters, watching 25 blokes with low IQ chasing a simulated pigs bladder round a field for an hour and a half then having a punch-up.

Shar'ia law would have them burnt for rioting wouldn't it? Bring it in for all of them, copper included.
 
#17
ALVIN said:
psychobabble said:
ALVIN said:
This man is living a double life, he is probebley mentaly ill, probebley bi polor disorder. The questian now being ------- Is mental illness a defence in this mans case ?
No, as his behaviour in this context is not a symptom of bipolar disorder or any other mental health problem ('The voice in my head told me to be a football hooligan'....don't think so), unless you class being a football hooligan as a mental illness.

Difficult to see how he will get off this unless GMP have the wrong chap...
Ahhh yes fair point, but on the other hand 99.9 % of football hooligans are not policemen :!: If i were the judge, i would certanly ask for psycriatric reports before sentencing :!:
Why? I wouldn't, as there's nothing in his behaviour or the offence he allegedly committed that has anything to do with being mentally unwell. He's just an idiot.
 
A

ALVIN

Guest
#18
psychobabble said:
ALVIN said:
psychobabble said:
ALVIN said:
This man is living a double life, he is probebley mentaly ill, probebley bi polor disorder. The questian now being ------- Is mental illness a defence in this mans case ?
No, as his behaviour in this context is not a symptom of bipolar disorder or any other mental health problem ('The voice in my head told me to be a football hooligan'....don't think so), unless you class being a football hooligan as a mental illness.

Difficult to see how he will get off this unless GMP have the wrong chap...
Ahhh yes fair point, but on the other hand 99.9 % of football hooligans are not policemen :!: If i were the judge, i would certanly ask for psycriatric reports before sentencing :!:
Why? I wouldn't, as there's nothing in his behaviour or the offence he allegedly committed that has anything to do with being mentally unwell. He's just an idiot.
Yes, im still going to stick to my guns on this one psychbobable, on the grounds of "abnormal contrast of carecter" EG--- A doctor by day, and proffesional theif by night ! futhermore, after reading the psycological reports, i could rest asured that any custodial sentence handed out, was safe :!: ----------- If i was a judge of course :!: L.O.L
 
#19
A proper numpty sits on the mirror of my truck.

 
#20
What a throbber!

Though I did like GMP's press release saying that he was not on duty at the time, would have been funny seeing him in his own riot kit with the other idiot football "fans".

Hope the tool gets everything that he deserves.
 

Similar threads

Latest Threads

Top