Wearing a condom violates the right to free speech...Eh?

Discussion in 'The NAAFI Bar' started by Grey_Mafia65, Jan 12, 2013.

Welcome to the Army Rumour Service, ARRSE

The UK's largest and busiest UNofficial military website.

The heart of the site is the forum area, including:

  1. I look forward to your explanations as to how that works!

    BBC News - Porn companies sue to overturn Los Angeles condom law
     
  2. Talking with their mouths full?.........just saying like...:grin:
     
    • Like Like x 2
    • Like Like x 1
  3. It's because they beleive people don't watch grumble flicks wth condoms in.

    Both (all) participants are willing to forego the rubber, so why should they be forced to use them?

    HIV outbreaks aside.
     
  4. Unlike some, i actually DO wear my Wellington boots in the bath so well done the LA condom law. I take it that Bukkake will be exempt? It would be a tad boring otherwise.
     
  5. [​IMG]
     
  6. Brotherton Lad

    Brotherton Lad LE Reviewer

  7. I thought only knob-heads did that?
     
  8. The right to bear cocks?
     
    • Like Like x 6
  9. Depending on the gentrification of the wedding, or the one where the end of a condom is sniffed up one nostril, then sniffed and swallowed down the throat before being hawked out the mouth, whereby both ends are then used as a pull through.

    Hmm, maybe not.
     
  10. Bear cocks!!!!
    Jesus christ that would be dangerous as fuck.

    Those fucking bears can be well agressive if you get between them and their pornstars.
     
  11. If the stars contracting HIV by doing that would they sue? Yes I think so
     
  12. I'd assume there would be clauses in their contracts preventing them from doing so. "Enter at your own risk" kind of thing.
     
    • Like Like x 2
  13. Sounds more like the right to bare cocks.