War news and commentary

Discussion in 'Current Affairs, News and Analysis' started by PartTimePongo, Mar 23, 2003.

Welcome to the Army Rumour Service, ARRSE

The UK's largest and busiest UNofficial military website.

The heart of the site is the forum area, including:

  1. As Woopert is keeping the Int cell thread to just news headlines, fell free to stick News Headlines and commentary in here.

    Rumsfeld says the POW's shown on Al-Jazeera may not be American soldiers

    ......."and the band played - You can believe it if you like"

    However, they may actually be voluntary human shields, that the evil Iraqi propoganda gits, have got to dress up like American soldiers?

    If that gets used, I want my cut
  2. So does that mean we can spout off about, unprofessional, gung ho, cowboy, big egoed spam Ba@tards continually slotting our blokes.

    I can find no excuse for this mornings incident with the GR4 and the Patriot, condolencies the the crews families and colleagues, was wondering if the wreckage still had the bang seats in?

    I don't think it matters wether or not we Squawk IFF or carry a big 'don't shoot at us arrow' I believe the trigger happy yanks wil still open up on our callsigns.

    Rumsfeld expressed sorrow for the feelings of the man on the button of the missile......................no mention of the blokes on the recieving end of his act of murderous negligence.
  3. Saw the Marines in action in Umm Qasr again tonight, you remember, that town the Spams said they'd cleared out?

    Royal Marines in OBUA in Al Faw ,lots of heart stopping stuff, with chanting prayers for their safe deliverance like a mantra. Same for God's own regiment, and assorted followers, who even as we speak , are going in.

    Keep safe DM, Mav and the lads , nothing heroic, let the Spams do that.

    As for the fcuking journalists. Thanks for not observing OPSEC , or maybe you knew what you were doing?

  4. Soldier_Why

    Soldier_Why LE Moderator

  5. The showing of the dead bodies was inappropriate, but at the risk of upsetting some skulking spam refugee from the other means  -  We showed dead bodies of Iraqis . It's not nice, it's not proper, but it happens. As for the POW pictures thing. We showed theirs, they showed ours . One all, let's get back to the geneva convention.

    All of us remember the images of Marines lying face down in the road, hands behind their heads, while some capable looking Argentinian gentlemen, took down the flag.

    And what did that do to us? The entire British nation wanted the blood of the men who humiliated our marines and Flag.

    The US administration need to go grab a cup of "wake the fcuk up" This is WAR . That properly unpleasant sh1tty thing, that friends and loved ones of ours are operating under at the moment, with ROE as restrictive as over the water by the way the fcuking media bang on.

    All Rumsfelds sudden attacks of amnesia, and "I am not aware of any POW's"  - Lying sack of shit , is not helping the fighting man and woman of any service.

    Wake up Stavros, this ain't the fight you ducked out of, this ain't some corporate battle, or plastic models on a big map. These are the lives of men and women you are pissing about with, trying to act the humanitarian, whilst running your own agenda. I think the reality of it all , is finally sinking in. This is evidenced, by the sea change in the US rhetoric, from "Une piece de Piss" to "This is a long haul" , which, the British planners, and others , have been saying since this was first proposed.

    As a retired American Admiral said today "The news of the Tornado, is probably on Page 684, with the by-line, of an American Officer going postal in Camp Penn"

    There are prisoners, your servicemen and women expect you to say "We are going to get our people back, if we have to tear down Baghdad brick by brick" They want to know, that if they go into the bag, their Secretary of Defense won't be saying "Prisoners? what Prisoners?" Smacks of deniabilty, and trying to save your own administrations carcass.

    Whatever you say, about "Isolated pockets of resistance" and "Gangs of gunmen" someone in Iraq, is shooting at our troops, and the more they shoot at us, the more the others are encouraged to resist. I am still waiting for the garlands of flowers that Dick Cheney promised our troops, for liberating the poor oppressed Iraqi people , as opposed to the fcuking artillery and silkworms that a grateful Iraqi nation is currently tossing at their liberators.
  6. US military officials have confirmed 12 American soldiers are missing after Iraqi TV broadcast images of dead troops and prisoners.

    Pentagon sources said the dead soldiers appeared to have been executed.

    They told Sky News the soldiers had bullet holes in their heads.
  7. This next few lines must on NO account be taken as a dig or a view of lack of backing for our blokes in the desert


    I watched with fists clenched, Bushes & Blairs speech regarding the liberation of the Iraqi people.

    If this is the case surely our blokes should be being welcomed into the various cities over there and only be meeting very small pockets of Hard line Saddam supporting resistance.

    If these people are prepared to stand and fight and not give us the open arm welcome that some idiots were expecting the question has to be asked....Do they want to be liberated?

    What is the real reasoning for our presence in an oil rich, flattened country?

    I wonder how the shares for the Companies holding the contracts for the rebuild are doing. I wonder how closely linked Mr Bush is to those companies.

    Couple the pathetic lies and the fact that the SPAMS are slotting our blokes and journalists and I think we can say we have been stitched with another Yankie Clusterf@ck.

    Of course I wish for the safe return of all troops and especially the Brits, perhaps a simple question to the Iraqi people should be posed........Do you want to be liberated? If the answer is no then perhaps Tony should find the balls to tell George he is on his on and pull our boys out.

    I don't want to see any more of our troops killed just so George Bush Senior can have drinks cabinet in down town Baghdad
  8. MDN
    After just 4 days of war, count the FCUK ups, I dont want to sound pedantic but I told you so, you have to remember, it isnt just about liberation, there is a bigger picture, one of oil, globalisation, so called democratic expansion.
    Now the Iraqis yes will fight, some will fight for Saddam, but more will fight the infidel, and this is something that some westerners cannot comprehend, America is not just disliked it is despised throughout the middle east, what you have to think is WHY, when you can confront that question and answer it honestly, you will understand. The Muslim faith will spur some on to fight to the bitter end, and scenes like the American missile attack on a bus in Syria wont help matters, dont forget we see dead, they see martyrs. As for shares in companies, Donald Rumsfeld does have a share holding in some contractors, couple this with all the American administrators, from President down who hold some power or, holding in the major oil companies, you see some jigsaw pieces fitting together, Tony Blair has swallowed the biggest lie, and he has tried to sell it to our nation, I do think he honestly believes with passion that what the forces are doing is right, but as we all know passion can sometimes cloud the truth.
    • Like Like x 1
  9. NIMN

    Before you go spouting I told you so, read back through some of my posts.

    I agree with the majority of your posts, however the way you put it a cross on a military forum is a little tongue in cheek, especially when the vast majority of us went last time or are there now.

    Yes the man should be removed, yes the Iraqi people deserve better, just not in this way, although I suppose we are there now and there is little we can about it. Although as I said before If they WANT  better they have a funny way of showing it

    I am reserving my opinions as I don't want to be categorised as a hippy or a protestor, but come on......we aint all mugs
  10. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/2879941.stm

    UK troops face 'Saddam zealots'

    As one senior officer put it, we had the Iraqis at our staff training colleges in the 1950s, 60s and 70s - this is classic counter-insurgency

    No sh1t, you think?

    The British are reluctant to fight in Basra any more than any other urban area.

    But military sources clearly believe there are several hundred hard-core, well-armed Saddam Hussein loyalists holed up in the city.

    That was why there were air raids over Basra on Saturday night.

    But as one British officer confided, it is very difficult to bomb people's hearts.

    If the Head sheds are interested in how Saddam and his coterie intend to prosecute this war



    [bold]Let us first consider the question: Who are the combatants in guerrilla warfare? On one side we have a group composed of the oppressor and his agents, the professional army, well armed and disciplined, in many cases receiving foreign help as well as the help of the bureaucracy in the employ of the oppressor. On the other side are the people of the nation or region involved. It is important to emphasize that guerrilla warfare is a war of the masses, a war of the people. The guerrilla band is an armed nucleus, the fighting vanguard of the people. It draws its great force from the mass of the people themselves. The guerrilla band is not to be considered inferior to the army against which it fights simply because it is inferior in firepower. Guerrilla warfare is used by the side which is supported by a majority but which possesses a much smaller number of arms for use in defense against oppression[/bold]


    Something which the US command would be advised to go back and read, seeing as they wrote it
  11. Ord_Sgt

    Ord_Sgt RIP

    The human shields really are on drugs. Either that or spouting Iraqi propaganda.http://www.humanshields.org/

    Latest News From Human Shields And Around The Globe

    Sunday 23rd March, 2003 18:06 +0300

    Latest report from Human Shield in Baghdad - "a plane shot down, just outside the press centre as I just happened to be there, was getting interview by Canada T.V with Reuters. They were burning down the grass trying to find the other pilot, caught a female British pilot. The atmosphere was one of pandemonium and exhileration."

    Claims to have seen it when we now know it was rubbish.

    And another one from the BBC.


    Are these people really that stupid that they thought it would stop the bombs? Don't bother to answer that one. ::)

    The final sentence is very revealing.

    Did they really think it would be any different? ::)
  12. NOt sure what makes my blood boil more

    Stupid lying cretin human shields


    Idiot Ministers of the Crown. Did anyone else see C4 news tonight?

    He lied, he knew it, Jon Snow knew it too. How much longer do we have to put up with this clown?
  13. msr

    msr LE

    >Latest report from Human Shield in Baghdad - "a plane >shot down, just outside the press centre as I just >happened to be there, was getting interview by Canada >T.V with Reuters. They were burning down the grass >trying to find the other pilot, caught a female British pilot. >The atmosphere was one of pandemonium and >exhileration."

    >Claims to have seen it when we now know it was rubbish.

    Exactly, but did you see how many people it tied up looking for them? Must have been hundreds for several hours, not to mention the thousands of rounds also expended....
  14. "Officers within the Scots DG admitted the brigade as a whole vastly underestimated the likely restistance and the loyalty locals would show to the regime"  (www.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/2882099.stm this does not link directly as I do not know how to do it).  
    Interestingly there are reports that the Fedyaeen are reinforced by Iraqi/Arab merceneries/mujahadeen who fought in Grozny and the Checheno-Ingush hence the resistance.  Still I am sure that it is early days yet.  I would say look back at any campaign we have fought in and it would appear that in the early days we often underestimated the resistance we would face.  On top of this I would imagine that no matter how much training one conducts beforehand the realities of war dictate that one reasseses how business is conducted and that this takes time to materialise on the ground in the way that things are conducted.  I have utmost faith in our troops and troops of the coalition and am sure that given the time to adapt the troops will the do job in hand.
    It is all rather strange at moment, I feel like some sick voyeur when I have the luxery of typing this from PC and taking a number two on my porcelain throne, wiping my ARRSE on duvet soft bog roll.  Especially when I have just read the best piece on the war so far by an embedded journo with the Royal Marines who describes the difficulties in just conducting the basic neccessities in life, eating, drinking and sleeping.  (www.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/2883229.stm again not linked).

    My only fear is that we have been led down the path by our politicians.  I note that last night on Newsnight a General who commanded a Division in the last Gulf War was extremely scathing of the US Administration in its preparation for war by basically not giving Franks everything he required and by saying that the political will is not there to allow the troops the free reign to conduct operations in the way that is required.

    I guess what I am trying to say in a rather confused manner is that I am sick of all these pundits and journalists throwing in their tuppence worth who seem to detracting from what men and women are having to put up with and questioning every move that is made.  It is a war for christs sake.  Do these bloody people really expect everything to go like clockwork?  Listening to the radio it would seem that the journos want it all to go wrong just so that they can feed like vultures off the misery of everyone else.  I would be happy if the military imposed a reporting ban or at least controlled it a great deal more than is being done at the moment.  Believe me journalists are rapidly replacing lawyers and estate agents as my least popular people.  The embeds seem ok, they report very specific facts often after the event and will due to the nature of their position show some loyalty to those they are with.  It is the tossers elsewhere that really piss me off.

    Remove if not appropriate.
  15. Appropriate

    But, journalists will report on, or twist whatever they see, to sell more newspapers/air time. Their considerations of our finer feelings, are not particularly high. This may change with the embedded ones, as they share the privations of the frontline.

    Yes it hasn't been going exactly according to plan. I'll oversimplyfy here. The problem is caused by YESMEN Generals , who will tell Rumsfeld anything he wants to hear. Tommy Franks tried to criticize, and point out the job couldn't get done with less than a certain number. He got vocal, the Washington Post reveals his expense accounts are irregular, and his wife attends security briefings. How strange. Admiral Kummel has some things to say, and lo and behold...Removed from post for having an affair with another officer
    (Young, fresh , female tight butt - Way to go Bob)

    Now as long as you have the yesmen in charge, who are more concerned about their careers and future employment, and see the TV as a tool to promote themselves, you will have a problem - I draw the Juries attention to the Minister for Defence, who needs sacking now, because quite apart from the fact he looks a psycophantic knobber, he's a liar as well. And when the Minister in charge of the warry bits is prepared to lie, often,  then people are going to get hurt