Bugsy said:
Gren said:
I just personally think its a load of shite, and a life choice made by fookin idiots who for some very odd reason, have decided not to do what they were designed for, and eat meat.
The very sad ones, who refuse to drink milk or wear leather or fur etc etc, are just beyond help, they seriously are very odd.
Why refuse to wear leather? why not drink milk? if God wanted us to be veggies and whatever the other fooked upped versions are, he wouldnt have given us the built in tools to allow the eating of them, would he?
If he wanted us to eat veg alone, we would all have a gob full of molars, and three stomaches to digest with, our appendix would still be a useful part of the body, and we would have hoofs not feet.
As to not wearing certain animal materials, I wonder how many vegan/veggie/whatevers, lived or indeed survived way back when?
Answer? none, because its a load of balls, and is a very recent thing in modern history, brought about by hippy ******* who love the earth, like it gives a shite back.
Fookin tw@s the lot of em.
Iâll leave the question of god out of it. But you seem to think that just because we do things, they must, by definition, be ânaturalâ. That doesnât make it so, and it doesnât make those who decide not to do it âfookinâ idiotsâ. Why would you assume that theyâre âidiotsâ anyway when itâs quite obvious that most of them arenât? Is it because they don't do what you do? Isn't that a bit of an intolerant attitude?
Wearing shoes at all is âunnaturalâ, as is flying in planes, driving cars, living a 100 floors up in a block of flats, eating baked beans from a tin and any number of other things that we accept as part of our way of life, but are by no means "natural".
Drinking milk; milk is for calves, not humans. There's a reason why humans are weaned off breast-milk, just as calves are weaned off cow's milk. In addition, in South East Asia, they don't drink milk as a rule after their childhood, and they can't, since they no longer have the enzymes to process it.
I disagree that itâs a very recent development in modern history. Thereâs plenty of evidence to support the case that the diet of ancient humans was primarily vegetarian, and that the transition to being omnivores happened in the comparatively recent past. It wasn't introduced by "hippy *******", as you'd obviously like to believe.
And although it's a bit off-thread: why exactly are hippies âwankersâ?
MsG
So some far off race cannot tolerate milk, that then makes it wrong? grow up.
Hippies are *******, no reason I can see to have to justify that statement.
Eating meat in the human race is as natural as farting or having sex, as is wearing shoes to stop us from hurting our feet, its called adapting to advancement in our lives, so therefore, going backwards into just eating veg, is wrong, in the advancement stakes, if nothing else.
And is very wrong in the natural order of what we are, omnivorus, which we are, we eat everything, cattle eat veg, Lions eat meat, we eat a varied and wide selection of both, tis why we are top of the food chain.
And it is also why veggies are considered beardy hippy *******, with no more right to live on gods green earth than a rapist.
Greenpeace/Friends of the earth, and all those hippy type fucktards who weave their own beards and overgrown vaginal hair collections, into eco friendly nature baskets for the collection of naturally wind blown apples, in some strange hope it will give the planet a longer life, really get on my tits TBH.
And veggies are just an offshoot of them, which is why i say what I do.
You have teeth I assume? how many of them are in your mouth to eat veg alone? 4 on each side, 8 counting top and bottom sets, the rest are for eating meat, and breaking the food down, so given we have on average 32 teeth, veggies are not naturallly what we are.
So get over it you hippy c
unt.
