Cracking picture, what are the markings around the top of the turret for?This restored WW2 D-Day Royal Marines Close Support Centaur Mark IV tank used to sit opposite the Pegasus Bridge Cafe next to the canal and the bridge but it has now been moved to the grounds of the Pegasus Bridge Memorial Museum on the other side of the canal along with the original bridge. It has been replaced by a bofors Anti-Aircraft gun.
View attachment 476290
'Vidette' is one of the few Centaur Mk IV close support tanks to survive the war.
Don't actually know why as none of the Centaurs that landed on D-Day made it that far. They were recalled to ship and then back to blighty. That fount of all wisdom, Wikipedia, gives us this:
"The Centaurs were not used in combat except for those fitted with a 95 mm howitzer, which were used in support of the Royal Marines during the amphibious invasion of Normandy" and also....
"In contrast, the Centaur was chiefly used for training; only those in specialist roles saw action. The Centaur IV Close Support version with a 95 mm howitzer saw service in small numbers as part of the Royal Marine Armoured Support Group on D-Day. Originally intended to serve as static pillboxes, these examples retained the engine allowing the Marines to advance the tank inland. A number of Centaurs were also re-purposed as combat engineering vehicles, such as an armoured bulldozer.
They look like the cast (geddit) from JoJo Rabbit.Right first one all done.
What... No! Bad Listy!
The VP21 is completed, along with a squad of Hitler youth tank hunters:
I'm not sure how I feel about the bases and the scatter though. Might wait until tomorrow to make a decision.
Got a set of Accurate Armour RMASG Decals going FOC if you want them Si.where I’m heading is getting a Centaur kit. Seems unfair to have a Cromwell without doing a Centaur.......
anyway. Tracks and spare links all done. There is a shit load of etch...
View attachment 476286
and the fenders arrive next week....
Not sure how much of this I’ll use yet, and I may stick the fender on the Centaur
Look's like Panther track link
Turret has Churchill, Glacis has Tiger, toe plate has Sherman. It's quite common to see multiple track types glued onto tanks. 6th Guards Tank Brigade usually covered their tanks with them. The Track links are welded on, like the one providing protection to the drivers hatch.
The story goes that the War Office carried out a study into add on armour such as tracks and its effectiveness. On the hull they found that it was neither beneficial or negative. However on the turret, it could put the turret out of balance and wear the gears, and slow turret rotation.More physiological, I think I’d have felt more confident with that lot stuck in front!
MP40Just started the second of the pair, I have the option of either the original Lee Enfield or an MP40, probably going for the MP40 as A) it's a better moulded option and B) it looks to be a better balanced piece with it. your thoughts?
View attachment 476836
View attachment 476834
View attachment 476835
On 25 September a Lt Hardy of the R Sigs sent the last carrier pigeon of Arnhem with a short message. Point 3 of 5 was 'Now using as many German weapons as we have British...' (quoted in Chester Wilmot's book). So, the MP40 would not be wrong.Just started the second of the pair, I have the option of either the original Lee Enfield or an MP40, probably going for the MP40 as A) it's a better moulded option and B) it looks to be a better balanced piece with it. your thoughts?
Exactly,that was my idea for them, to show the desperation of those last days.On 25 September a Lt Hardy of the R Sigs sent the last carrier pigeon of Arnhem with a short message. Point 3 of 5 was 'Now using as many German weapons as we have British...' (quoted in Chester Wilmot's book). So, the MP40 would not be wrong.
I imagine track links were hardened? I can't see untempered links being much use as a wearing surface...?! As such there must have been some value vis a vis diverting energy from incoming rounds.The story goes that the War Office carried out a study into add on armour such as tracks and its effectiveness. On the hull they found that it was neither beneficial or negative. However on the turret, it could put the turret out of balance and wear the gears, and slow turret rotation.
They also found that it provided no effect against incoming fire, what with the tracks being steel, not armour plate.
In an attack of common sense they realised they couldn't ban the practice, and even if they could, they couldn't enforce it. They then considered the morale aspect, of both its effect in the field, and the damage a ban would do to relations between the War Office and the citizen soldier.
So they left it alone.
These are apparently of British forces advancing through France and Belgium in 1944:-I have deliberately left the back clearer. I have noticed that the left side has more dust on it and it got me to thinking what side of the road did the army use in France.
Well first of all you have to consider the time to face harden. Then how much wear is going to happen around the track pins, and how quickly the track links will need to be replaced from that. I suspect the track pins and the like are actually what fails first on tracks. So throwing them out fast and cheap is better than over engineering. Mild Steel is really crap for stopping projectiles.I imagine track links were hardened? I can't see untempered links being much use as a wearing surface...?! As such there must have been some value vis a vis diverting energy from incoming rounds.
Digging back into my long forgotten and little-used degree in engineering I can see several advantages, on paper at least:-
AP kinetic penetrators expend energy punching through the hardened steel of the link (albeit not "armour" hardened) and expend some more in the action/reaction effect that generates that effect you see in slo-mo film of tests that flings the track away from the hull. The track and it's reactive motion may also disrupt the path of the round, using up more energy and changing the round aspect with respect to course. Equals less penetrative energy for the main armour and the chance of a full or vehicle-saving partial deflection.
AP exploding rounds initiate before penetrating the main armour, reducing their penetrative and spalling effects.
Shaped charge and explosively-formed penetrators such as panzerfaust initiate on impact with the track and when they burn through the link and hit the harder armour there is a splash effect, which flings the track off and consumes energy, reducing the penetrative effect on the main armour - when the copper jet burns through the link and hits the (admittedly tiny) air gap between the track and the main hull/turret armour and "splashes" against the harder main armour, having lost energy and shape penetrating the link.
It's like a very early attempt at doing what ERA does but without the E, almost. Oh, and without the level of effectiveness - but in a few cases some vital effectiveness nonetheless.
Spares or protection? Spares would have been in racks or otherwise attatched so they can be freed. Protection was usually attatched however the crew could. In the case of Tracklinks on the Churchill's they were usually welded in place.How were track links attached? In the Churchill book I've got they appear to be fitted in purpose-built racks as true spares.
Yes, looks to be Panther track on the glacis - and the Churchill had frontal armour as thick as the Tiger's...