USS John S McCain collides with merchant ship

The McCain turned hard left eh.. Who would have thunk it.
 

Auld-Yin

ADC
Kit Reviewer
Book Reviewer
Reviews Editor
They look pretty blameless based on that. They were transmitting AIS and holding a steady course.
But their bridge was not manned to company SOPs. True they did what they could but there is still the fact that the watch was undermanned.
 

endure

GCM
But their bridge was not manned to company SOPs. True they did what they could but there is still the fact that the watch was undermanned.

As opposed to the JSM which had 11 watchkeepers on the bridge at the time of the collision....
 

Auld-Yin

ADC
Kit Reviewer
Book Reviewer
Reviews Editor
As opposed to the JSM which had 11 watchkeepers on the bridge at the time of the collision....
Quite so, and the USN fix is to increase manning, albeit to address fatigue also.
 

Bouillabaisse

LE
Book Reviewer
But their bridge was not manned to company SOPs. True they did what they could but there is still the fact that the watch was undermanned.
They could have 30 people on the bridge and not done much about it. Collision regs and good seamanship dictate that they stand on as they did and their ability to manoeuvre was limited. Its standard practice to share the blame a bit in marine collisions. Like blaming pilot error if he's dead.
 
Well CDR Alfredo Sanchez has pled guilty.
The article gives a few more details of the incident.

US Naval Institute News
 
Also, SECNAV has decided that VADM Rowden, in charge of USN surface forces will retire as RADM ROwden.

US Naval Institute News
 

endure

GCM
Well CDR Alfredo Sanchez has pled guilty.
The article gives a few more details of the incident.

US Naval Institute News

"Prior to the plea agreement, Sanchez could have faced more serious charges including negligent homicide and hazarding a vessel, which could have resulted in jail time, according to a January decision by naval reactors director Adm. James F. Caldwell. "

"In the court-martial, Sanchez admitted he acted against the recommendation of his operations officer, navigator and executive officer."

"A ship’s sea and anchor detail include a U.S. warship’s most experienced ship handlers that are put on the watch bill when the ship enters difficult operating areas. Instead, Sanchez ordered the more experienced watch team to get an extra hour of sleep and said he would supervise the less experienced crew on the bridge.

During the transit, a change in settings on the ship’s new digital integrated bridge and navigation system caused the 18-year-old helmsman to lose control of McCain when the steering function was transferred to another terminal on the bridge.

“We put this on this 18-year-old,” Sanchez said."


Jail time? He ought to be keelhauled and then, if he's still breathing, flogged round the fleet.

How the ferk did he get to be a Commander?
 
Cross-decking.
Nothing carrier related but interesting...

I've had a very brief look at the linked report, and to be honest, Rear Admiral Bill Galinis appears at first glance to be a bit of a dick.
 
Cross-decking.


I've had a very brief look at the linked report, and to be honest, Rear Admiral Bill Galinis appears at first glance to be a bit of a dick.
"Commonality" per se, is not a bad idea, but when it comes to mission critical systems, you need to have a bit more thought going into, rather than they just think " they will be alright," and stick them across various platforms. The problem Boeing is having right now with their 737 range...If it's cars or something, easier to implement/ recall but not easy on differing platforms where lives are at stake...may look outwardly similar sometimes, but not necessarily so inside.
 

Top