US Warships to Lebanon

Discussion in 'Current Affairs, News and Analysis' started by AndyPipkin, Feb 29, 2008.

Welcome to the Army Rumour Service, ARRSE

The UK's largest and busiest UNofficial military website.

The heart of the site is the forum area, including:

  1. But isn't the USS Nassau carrying the 24th MEU's aircraft and pilots?
  2. "The deployment is seen as a warning to Syria"

    Does it mean, US is planning to "spread democracy" to Syria as well?
  3. AndyPipkin,

    Is this what smartly-dressed, clever young things in Whitehall and elsewhere call 'power projection'? You know, sail your large grey canoe off someones shore, and they'll be begging to be friends with you before sunset.

    Do you really think this will make a positive difference to the strategic and tactical thinking of Hezbollah? Methinks the complete opposite. :x

    Not stricktly true tomahawk 6. The Nassau ESG (TF-62) consists of 6 surface vessels and a submarine (which still hasn't left the states!). It is only USS Nassau from TF-62 that is joining USS Cole of the Lebanese coast. So, no MEU and no support ships means a rather weak 'show of force' - all things considered. Looks more like an evacuation mission than anything else - as they've borrowed a handful of whirly things from elsewhere.

  4. The Nassau has its entire ARG with it. :)
    The other ships with Nassau are the dock landing ship Ashland, also based at Little Creek, the Norfolk-based destroyers Ross and Bulkeley and the cruiser Philippine Sea, based in Mayport, Fla., as well as the Norfolk-based attack submarine Albany.
  5. Here is the Nassau and its ARG on Feb 25. Sorry whitecity the sub isnt visible so you have to trust me she's there. :D

  6. tomahawk6,

    I trust your efforts to research and apply some attention to detail were a little better when you were in command of men. Sadly, it seems to have left you in recent times (my bold)...

    From the link YOU posted, first paragraph...
    The Nassau ESG took over command of TF-62 when it arrived in the 6th Fleet AO. All six surface ships in attendance. However, and here's the crucial detail you have missed - or ignored - is that USS Nassau alone is to steam into the Eastern Mediterranean to join the USS Cole and support ship (it still has a long way to go!).

    Now, as regards the submarine, which for your reference as you like quoting numbers and names is USS Albany SSN 753 (my bold)...

    Of course, the Navy could be lieing just to confuse Hezbollah. But I doubt an LA Class attack submarine will present too much of a threat to their operations, do you.

    Best sharpen your pencil General. :D
  7. And as a little aside, USS Cole is supposedly sailing with the HMS Illustrious Task Group to take part in Ex Orion 08. Don't say the RN and RAF are going to be expected to lay on the fireworks if the Cole gets wacked again!!!
  8. The Nassau is the command ship for the ARG so they arent going off alone thats for sure.
  9. Do you have any evidence to support this new assertion given that it contradicts that which you initially brought to ARRSE?

    Or, are you just playing the age old game of trying to look clever by stating your beliefs in a firm and resolute manner - irrespective of their veracity?
  10. Looking clever is your MO. The article I posted from Navy Times did mention three ships which may or not replace the Cole. However,the Navy doesnt normally break up an ARG. This particular ARG left port without an MEU, a USN first. However, the ARG could pick up Marines or SF personnel in Naples.
  11. Thank you General, I'll take that as a compliment. :)

    I only look clever if the words I type and the analysis and predictions I make turn out to be true and valid. I look a fool, as does anyone else, if I make bold statements and predictions that turn out to be complete tosh - especially if it contradicts the evidence I introduce. Nevertheless, I am not of the habit of trying to bluff my way out errors by simply repeating the same but more forcefully.

    Without 24 MEU, 8 ESG is just a strike group in name. Its current mission has been completely readjusted in light of the fact that it is sailing without its MEU component. 8 ESG is now just 6 ships trundling around the oceans on goodwill visits and playing exercises. Unless otherwise ordered, the other 5 ships of the ESG will continue with the planned exercise at the opposite end of the Meditteranean. In effect, each ship has now become an individual asset to CNE rather than a combined package.
  12. Odd that they would be photographed together just a few days ago then ? Lets see how this plays out though whitecity.If events prove me correct I will gladly accept your apology. :D
  13. That will of course be forthcoming after you apologise for your errors of judgement. Starting with the incorrect information on the submarine's whereabouts - unless of course you have evidence to share with us that the USN is publically diseminating false information. It cuts both ways General.

    As regards the picture taken on the 25th that you posted above, I have no idea where it was sourced. However, the link I posted above has a similar picture, taken on the same day with the caption...
    It seems perfectly logical to me that all ships of ESG8 should be together whilst crossing the Atlantic. What they do subsequently is, however, quite another matter. Don't you agree? Or is the entire premise of your argument that all 6 ships are sailing to Lebanon based upon this one photo opportunity taken mid-Atlantic? Attention to detail, General.

    At this moment, I see no reason for 8 USN warships to be stationned off the coast of Lebanon. The situation simply doesn't warrent it and certainly not at the expense of wrecking a multi-national exercise. There wasn't that many ships there when Israel was wrecking havoc in 2006. I suspect USS Cole +1 are going to be relieved by USS Nassau so that Cole +1 can continue through the Suez with the rest of the Lusty Group. It's a guess.