US troops "brighter, stronger, more committed" than Brits?

Discussion in 'Current Affairs, News and Analysis' started by AndyPipkin, May 17, 2007.

Welcome to the Army Rumour Service, ARRSE

The UK's largest and busiest UNofficial military website.

The heart of the site is the forum area, including:

  1. Someone needs to send that cnut Mark Urban the story that was written by the U.S. Journalist who was embedded with our Infantry several weeks ago during an Op where they kicked arse and brought it to the insurgents... What a T.WAT!!!!!
  2. Well the aussies are definitely fitter on average - why not the yanks? Cant see Mr Urban getting a lift in my Snatch now though!
  3. Curious comments from Mark Urban, normally a sharp and savvy operator. One for the guys on the ground to answer. Is there too much cynicism in UK armed forces these days? Another Blair legacy?
  4. The author is simply a racist

    I suspect that after 'by contrast' the author wrote something else (edited later).
  5. Why do you suspect that, Sergey? And what?
  6. Mark Urban Quote: "But there is no shortage of determination or creativity and tonight Sergeant Perez and Lieutenant Carlisle will probably resume their running discourse in the Dura cafe about how they can do it better tomorrow. "

    If they don't set a pattern and get blown to pieces that is.

    Mr Urban seems impressed that the sceptics are discussing removing sunglasses to speak to natives and waving at them (watch which hand you use!) rather than blowing them away. Perhaps he should have watched more British army recruiting adverts as aprt of his research!


  7. Try doing some research on the author before slagging him... he's a former officer in your military and has decent credentials for a journalist.
  8. Can't folks go through a thread without bashing yanks? If you want to bash someone, bash the author because the yanks never even said they were better than anyone. These guys are just trying to finish their year long tours without getting themselves or buddies killed. I think we should either remember that or leave the yanks alone.
  9. I'm sure a fair analysis of British soldiers was provided.

    Perhaps this explains it.
  10. Let us not forget that the reason we are in Iraq has nothing to do with Saddam, or middle east peace or anything else apart from securing a huge proportion of the worlds oil predominantly for the good old US of A. We are now having to pick up the shit and be tarred with the same brush as them. We are in a totally unwinnable war and the sooner we realise that and pull out the better-both us and america.
  11. A fairly silly argument for Urban to make in any case. Are Americans in general more intelligent too?

    The British Army are conceded as being one of the best trained armies in the world; our forces are lauded for their ability to punch above their weight.

    We are not the best armed forces but then such a claim would be beyond proving in any case.

    The points I will make based upon long-term exposure to US Forces are that the majority of US manpower join for short periods for economic reasons (paying for college etc) and tend to be from the lower/poorer classes, including racial minorities, bringing with them far more serious social problems (drugs, poor diet when younger, poverty) than their UK counterparts (which while we have our problems they are not as widespread or at times serious as those within North America). The 'Mom's Apple Pie' image of US soldiers is a hollywood invention in the same way that all British Officers are upper-class twits...

    In addition the regimental system has the benefit of promoting better unit cohesion, which should outweigh the odd gifted commander in the US Forces.

    These factors are beginning to count for less as we amalgamate units and our social problems increase (MOD take note) but still give us a bit of an edge (not the edge though!).

    Urban I suspect that post was meant to bait us into this kind of response. Good journalism I concede but we all prefer what the media now term bad journalism (honest reporting, impartiality and a social concern as the reason for the story).

    I hope you win a prize for your good journalism; it is richly deserved.
  12. Mark Urban was in the British Army himself and often reports from UK bases, etc. I'm sure he has enough experience to make comparisons himself without relying on his cameraman or whoever.
  13. not convinced by what he says. as Sergey notes, he seems to imply that a drop in quality is indicated by extra recruitment of Commonwealth troops - I'm not sure that's true. we've got plenty of Commonwealth soldiers, some very good, some very bad, and not much different from everybody else.

    the US "can-do" attitude cuts both ways. on the one hand, it makes your blokes positive and committed; on the other, it can mean that failures don't get reported up the chain of command - wasn't this a criticism made by Brig Alwyn-Foster a couple of years ago?
  14. Nonsense my dear fellow. Of course the US problems will be larger that the UK problem because well they have a larger Armed forces. I think you are the one who seems to have a myopic view of US personnel with comments like