US stuck with Guantanamo Bay Prison

#1
From BBC news

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/7411862.stm

It seems that the Americans have got fed up with the whole Guantanmo Bay fiasco, but can't close (according to the US Defence Secretary Gates) because the inmates upon return to their home countries may become terrorists again! :oops:

Perhaps if they'd have thought of that if the 1st place, and actually tried and convicted them of terrorist acts under US law then they wouldn't have this problem. :roll:

Oh! I forgot, they couldn't charge them under US law because they actually didn't have sufficient EVIDENCE to convinct them. :wink:

Anyone idea's what the US should do now?

Answers on a postcard to...
 
#2
This simply goes to show the utter incompetence of the Bush Administration in handling this entire business. The answer to this issue is extremely simple. They should use extraordinary rendition to transport them to a 3rd World country and inform the authorities that the US government does not want to hear of these people ever again....
 
#3
Return them to their Countries of Origin, before Afghanistan, the Security Services of those countries might like to have a 'word'.
Other than that let the majority of them go, as they are only guilty of being rounded up for the bounty.
 
#6
Why not send them to the UK as one of them might have stopped here on his hols one year before becoming a jihadist?....oopps too late, we already have let some in.
 
#8
I suppose they could also sell it to Disney - all the inmates could get jobs working as Mickey Mouse and Donald Duck - or are those jobs already taken by the clowns in the Bush Administration! :wink:
 
#9
BAA are recruiting more security guards at Heathrow. Maybe we could offer some of these gentlemen jobs....................
 
J

jimuk80

Guest
#10
Stick some kind of tracking device up their arrses and let them lead us to their bolt hole. Better yet some kind of long distance remote explosive.
 
#11
jimuk80 said:
Stick some kind of tracking device up their arrses and let them lead us to their bolt hole. Better yet some kind of long distance remote explosive.
Sounds like a cunning plan. 8)

However, I'm sure the Yanks would still somehow manage to 'accidently' bomb the Chinese Embassy in a neighbouring country. :p
 
#12
Lesleycape said:
jimuk80 said:
Stick some kind of tracking device up their arrses and let them lead us to their bolt hole. Better yet some kind of long distance remote explosive.
Sounds like a cunning plan. 8)

However, I'm sure the Yanks would still somehow manage to 'accidently' bomb the Chinese Embassy in a neighbouring country. :p
LOL that was so funny (Serbia right?). Regrets for loss of life etc but the idea of some gum chewing redneck at 30,000 feet getting his maps mixed up and zapping the Chinks was funny. God were they angry!

:x :x :x
 
#13
You really are an unpleasant little grease stain, aren't you Annakey? As long as someone's criticising the spams, or Thatcher, or espousing some sort of pinko cack you're happy as a sand boy.

Why not pop off to your own little proletarian Nirvana, and stop bothering people who live in the real world.
 
#14
they could have a realy bad fire caused by accident solves the problem of the naughty boys and gets rid of the jail. not that im for it of course.
 

the_boy_syrup

LE
Book Reviewer
#15
Shoud've shot the fukcers on the battlefield
I mean how many innocent holidaymakers and sheep herders are just wandering past during a battle

Worked in Vietnam :wink:
 
#16
longlivethequeen said:
they could have a realy bad fire caused by accident solves the problem of the naughty boys and gets rid of the jail. not that im for it of course.

Bah you beat me to it.


Lesleycape said:
From BBC news

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/7411862.stm

It seems that the Americans have got fed up with the whole Guantanmo Bay fiasco, but can't close (according to the US Defence Secretary Gates) because the inmates upon return to their home countries may become terrorists again! :oops:

Perhaps if they'd have thought of that if the 1st place, and actually tried and convicted them of terrorist acts under US law then they wouldn't have this problem. :roll:

Oh! I forgot, they couldn't charge them under US law because they actually didn't have sufficient EVIDENCE to convinct them. :wink:

Anyone idea's what the US should do now?

Answers on a postcard to...

No one said they need return alive.


We could provide them with advanced jihad suicide bomber trainer and mistakenly use live ordinance...
 
#17
If their home nations will accept them, they should be returned there. Since they 'will not be charged' at Gitmo, why should US expect their homelands to not 'let them loose'? Can one really blame these men, after being held for years with no trials or charges brought, to not be bitter? And can one not expect that some of them may turn to terror, even if they were not so inclined to it before? The results of Bush's idiotic policies coming home to roost.

As to the others, who won't be accepted back, they present are a more difficult conundrum.
 
#18
Pitswamper said:
Return them to their Countries of Origin, before Afghanistan, the Security Services of those countries might like to have a 'word'.
Other than that let the majority of them go, as they are only guilty of being rounded up for the bounty.
Oh please Noooooooooooo! Most of them will claim to be British that means they not only get to stir up hate here, they also do it while claiming benefits.
And now for a wrist slapping from sven
 
#19
I'm still not sure how people who are captured on the battlefield are supposed to be 'tried'. Soldiers fighting on a battlefield don't exactly have time to gather evidence, witnesses, etc.
 
#20
arko said:
I'm still not sure how people who are captured on the battlefield are supposed to be 'tried'. Soldiers fighting on a battlefield don't exactly have time to gather evidence, witnesses, etc.
Well, since more than 400 out of about 800 prisoners have been 'released without charge', I would presume that any who were charged should get some type of trial?
 

Similar threads

Latest Threads

Top