US resume plutonium production

Discussion in 'Current Affairs, News and Analysis' started by Proximo, Jun 28, 2005.

Welcome to the Army Rumour Service, ARRSE

The UK's largest and busiest UNofficial military website.

The heart of the site is the forum area, including:

  1. From The Indie:

    The full story is here.

    How to incite the mob in 3 easy stages:

    1. Refer back to the cold war.
    2. Make vague reference to the 'weaponisation of space'.
    3. Include reportage about 'spy satellites' and 'secret missions'.

    $1.5Bn? This is a chickenfeed project by any reasonable comparison - they spent 10 times that amount on digital radios for NTC. 300lbs of plutonium over 30 years is barely sufficient for 2 small warheads per year - hardly cause for significant concern in the current world climate IMHO! :D
  2. Will the Springfield Nuclear Power Plant (prop. CM Burns) be involved? 8O
  3. OldSnowy

    OldSnowy LE Moderator Book Reviewer

    Not for Wardeads - wrong stuff. Satellite power more likely, compact, long-lasting batteries.

    Now why can't have batteries like this for Bowman? Size of a matchbox, and could replace a large generator. Mind you, the problem of RadHaz for operators might be a tad worse than at present :D
  4. OS - you're right of course - I was thinking of Pu 239. Doh! :D
  5. Again journos who have no clue about nuclear physics. Pu238 and Pu 239 are two completely different animals.
    Pu239 has a half life of 24000 years and is an alpha emitter.
    Pu238 has a half life of 88 years and is also an alpha emitter
    Pu239 can be used for nuclear fission, but not Pu238.

  6. It's probably to power undersea fiberoptic cable interception 'pods' installed by the USS Jimmy Carter.


    Is that Lord Lucan I can see swimming up to the boat...and who is that on the grassy knoll!?? :D
  8. Just google on "Operation Ivy Bells" - from the 1970's - then perhaps you need to apologise to Mr Pipkin. Oh, and look up what little open source material there is on the mods done to the "Jimmy Carter", in particular the "Ocean interface". Truth is stranger than fiction.
  9. OOTS - noise down. Good to see that you've taken on board the advice about pointless 'over-quoting' as well.

    Lack of open source material - you knob - it's a feckin SSN! What do you want - a full technical readout?

    Who feckin cares if the 'Jimmy Carter' is mooching about listening to us? You can't substantiate anything to do with these things - and claiming the tinternet as a repository of fact is utterly pathetic.


    Now, back to the thread...
  10. I'm afraid that personally abusing me does not compensate for your error - and you're right about over quoting, please accept my apologies.

    Ivy Bells has been widely reported in the media (including the internet) since Ronald Pelton sold the details to the USSR and was locked up for the rest of his natural as a result. One of the listening devices the US placed on undersea cables in the 1970's is on display in the ex-KGB museum in Moscow. Not tin-foil hat fodder, but a very successful mission. See "Blind Man's Bluff" for more info - in book form.

    Using a RTG for such a device would be a smart move. Of course whether or not the US can actually read fibre optics is not clear, theory says yes but the gap between that and practicality is often large. Still, whether or not they actually can it's not time for an aluminium foil beanie.

    As for the Jimmy Carter, the fact that it was delayed years to get a 100ft hull extension has been widely written about and discussed in the defence press. The USN have admitted that said mods are related to intelligence work and given out some sketchy details of the changes.

    But you definitely are a staff officer aren't you ? Any world view that challenges yours gets shouted down regardless of the facts. That works on your subordinates but you should try and bear in mind that any enemy we might face are resistant to changing their plans based on your predjudices. And yes I am mildly peeved.
  11. No kidding. Wipe your eyes, dry your nose and let's try to keep this on thread....hmmmm?

    And just for you:



  12. So let me summarise:

    That chap Pipkin puts forward a plausible explanation for the matter under discussion;
    You rubbish it through ignorance;
    When evidence is presented you ignore it;
    When more evidence is presented you wave a handbag at me;
    And then you want to get back on topic.

    Fine by me.
  13. James Bamford's 'Body of Secrets' discusses the role of the Jimmy Carter and its predecessor, the Parche, at great length. You can check out either vessel at

    Increasingly communications use fiberoptics rather than satellites, so it's unsurprising the US would want to tap them. You might also wonder why the USN maintains its own cable-laying ship.
  14. Slightly off topic, but how come Carter got a Sub when Ex-Presidents get a Carrier!
  15. I've run across various bits of fluff, from apparently non-authoritative sources, on the internet saying or implying that the U238 is intended as a long duration power source for space weapons.

    This link is representative:

    Whether there is anything to this is something I do not know.

    There's been a lot of hostile talk recently between USA and Russia as to whether USA will put weapons in space and the consequences that will ensue if it does.