Undercover plod goes native.

#2
Mr Kennedy is believed to have resigned in 2009 - On health grounds perhaps?
 
#3
The first annoyance I can see is that he didn't use a traditional eco-protestor name. Swampy is reserved, but he could have been sweepy, squelch, skelly, skimpy, skewwhiff, skinny, skirm, skivey, slangy, slacky, slappy, sloppy, Slither, Sloth, smokey, smudge, smirky, snappy, snakey, etc. I'm sure you get the idea, but Mark? oh come on, I would have spotted him pretty darn quick with a name like that.

Secondly, isn't this typical telegraph reporting? It shouldn't be a matter of sides. His first duty is to the Court, to the truth of the matter. If he has evidence to give that defends them, then he should give it. After all the oath is to tell the whole truth not just the bits that the police want to give. Quite franky it sounds to me one of those cases that shouldn't have gone to court in the first place. More like some local authority being heavy handed against some hippy types and getting it wrong. No doubt they'll cook up some other scam to harrass the hippys instead.
 
#4
I assume Mr kennedy will be paying any costs that have accrued to date,from the alleged £250k per annum he was paid during this time?[/url]
Let's not let the truth get in the way of some misinformed outrage eh? :)
 
#5
The first annoyance I can see is that he didn't use a traditional eco-protestor name. Swampy is reserved, but he could have been sweepy, squelch, skelly, skimpy, skewwhiff, skinny, skirm, skivey, slangy, slacky, slappy, sloppy, Slither, Sloth, smokey, smudge, smirky, snappy, snakey, etc. I'm sure you get the idea, but Mark? oh come on, I would have spotted him pretty darn quick with a name like that.

Secondly, isn't this typical telegraph reporting? It shouldn't be a matter of sides. His first duty is to the Court, to the truth of the matter. If he has evidence to give that defends them, then he should give it. After all the oath is to tell the whole truth not just the bits that the police want to give. Quite franky it sounds to me one of those cases that shouldn't have gone to court in the first place. More like some local authority being heavy handed against some hippy types and getting it wrong. No doubt they'll cook up some other scam to harrass the hippys instead.
Bang on. Sounds like he was serving the interests of justice to me. The news is reporting him as 'changing sides'. I don't agree. If you ask me, this can only reinforce the point of view that police are engaged on these operations to collate all the evidence, and package it up to present to a court, who make a decision as to whether to convict. It is not the duty of the officers involved to determine whether those involved are guilty or not. Whether spending hundreds of thousands on this type of op can be justified, is another question entirely.
 
#6
Bang on. Sounds like he was serving the interests of justice to me. The news is reporting him as 'changing sides'. I don't agree. If you ask me, this can only reinforce the point of view that police are engaged on these operations to collate all the evidence, and package it up to present to a court, who make a decision as to whether to convict. It is not the duty of the officers involved to determine whether those involved are guilty or not. Whether spending hundreds of thousands on this type of op can be justified, is another question entirely.
I think that there will be more to come out, possibly in a book. It would seem that this guy was compromised to some degree two years ago when his Hippy nickname changed from 'Flash' to 'Detective Stone'.

It seems that his real passport was seen by some protesters as well last October and it is reported that it was then that he admitted his role.

As for sides, well that is exactly how a Criminal Trial shapes out, Defence and Prosecution, for and against, call it what you will one side has to lie while the other tries to present the truth and/or give excuses.

As for serving the interests of justice, what was he serving until he changed his mind?

Mark Kennedy: A journey from undercover cop to 'bona fide' activist | Environment | The Guardian
 
#7
The News channels are now referring to 'the six innocent men' as probably they are.
 

Ravers

LE
Kit Reviewer
Book Reviewer
#8
So basically you can become a copper and spend a few years smoking weed and banging hippy birds while getting paid!?

Sign me the **** up.
 
#9
So basically you can become a copper and spend a few years smoking weed and banging hippy birds while getting paid!?

Sign me the **** up.
What he said.

Seriously however, this is amazing - I had no idea that the police behaved like this and they have plunged in my estimation. Shame on the Met, utter shame. You incited criminal activity and wasted public money. I hope that many and significant heads roll, you bunch of cretins.
 
#11
Why spend so much time and money infiltrating Swampy and the Crusty Jugglers? They're not exactly Al Queda.
Easier than getting a result in serious crime?
 
#12
Why spend so much time and money infiltrating Swampy and the Crusty Jugglers? They're not exactly Al Queda.
all depends on what intellignce they have, its possible that they have assocations with groups like ALF responsable for bombings and the like

you never know if someones dangrous untill you look into them
 
#13
all depends on what intellignce they have, its possible that they have assocations with groups like ALF responsable for bombings and the like

you never know if someones dangrous untill you look into them
They knew for years who the rabid hate preachers were and did **** all for ages and then not much.
 
#16
all depends on what intellignce they have, its possible that they have assocations with groups like ALF responsable for bombings and the like

you never know if someones dangrous untill you look into them
Fair enough, but do you really have to look at them for ten years?
 
#18
Bit more difficult to infiltrate though.
Apparently they have the people who can do it. Obviously not interested though. Especially as Channel 4 TV dispatches did so, and were called all sorts of shit by the W.Midlands Police, who later were proven completely wrong and had to retract.
 
#20
Am not a Shrink but perhaps the Peeler developed a kind of Stockholm Syndrome by Proxy. Went so deep undercover and played the game that eventually it fried his head. I see him trying to go for litigation in the future and sue the Met for lack of care. It has been inferred and not confirmed in the Media that he did smoke drugs and really tried hard to blend in. I see him looking for a few wee pound from an ACC or the Chief Con of the Met for lack of care. Wait Out..............
 

Similar threads

Latest Threads

Top