DSJ
LE

A ROLE MODEL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
No words!
He's right.
His son DOES need a role model.
Just not him or any of his convicted repugnant, perverted, deviant, morally abhorrent rapey friends.
A ROLE MODEL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
No words!
The general public (outside the M25) I believe would be quite happy for this flotsam of pond scum to be deported, or parachuted into the Atlantic wearing concrete boots.It makes you sick, doesn't it? No wonder people are losing faith in this country.
What's the point of even trying to be honest, paying taxes or defending the realm if the state lets people like this off?
At least in China/America/Russia/Saudi he would be given a very hard time or shot. Our problem is that we lack the confidence to deliver justice when someone is so obviously evil or had committed evil deeds.
Which, incidentally, is also why we need the death penalty.
That are a product of our lovingly left wing university education system.
Yes, indeed.He's right.
His son DOES need a role model.
A question: what does an individual have to do to forfeit his/her human rights?Unfortunately it appears none will be deported due to consideration for their 'human rights'
![]()
Leader of grooming gang - dubbed 'The Master' - wins fight against deportation
An Immigration Tribunal heard that, as 51-year-old Abdul Aziz would not lose his citizenship, it would therefore be wrong to deport two other gang members fighting to stay in the UKwww.mirror.co.uk
This despite their complete disregard for the 'human rights' of the hundreds of underage girls they regularly abused.
And this is where we fall down, when you commit a crime, especially ones as severe as rape and murder then you (IMO) have committed an act where you cease to be allowed human rights. Human rights should be there to protect the innocent and vulnerable, not those that commit intolerable harm.A question: what does an individual have to do to forfeit his/her human rights?
It seems to me that the most heinous of crimes can be committed and yet that individual's rights and wishes must still be respected.
There is something very wrong with that.
There is.A question: what does an individual have to do to forfeit his/her human rights?
It seems to me that the most heinous of crimes can be committed and yet that individual's rights and wishes must still be respected.
There is something very wrong with that.
I have to disagree; removing all human rights from criminals is a step too far. The fact that a mass murderer is not punished (let alone strung up from a tree) without due process is a bedrock of civil society, there are places in the world you can go and live under those (lack of) rules, none of them very nice. That is not to say that there are not serious problems with how our legal system operates which need to dealt with, but throwing the baby out with the bath water is just not a viable answer.And this is where we fall down, when you commit a crime, especially ones as severe as rape and murder then you (IMO) have committed an act where you cease to be allowed human rights. Human rights should be there to protect the innocent and vulnerable, not those that commit intolerable harm.
If you are a guest or immigrant to this country, then you chose to come here to make a better life for yourself, if you commit a crime while a guest or we have adopted you, then after sentence you are stripped of your UK citizenship, loaded on the first plane back to your country of origin and flown there, never to return.
Those that commit those crimes that are citizens of the UK should either be put to death, or castrated....
Time to stop being all lovey dovey , as it clearly doesn't work.
A question: what does an individual have to do to forfeit his/her human rights?
It seems to me that the most heinous of crimes can be committed and yet that individual's rights and wishes must still be respected.
There is something very wrong with that.
There is.
A case to considere was that of Hook Hamsa or Abu Hamsa Al-Masri. While incarnated in the UK on charges for sixteen offences including inciting violence and racial hatred, he was treated incredibly softly here but faced extradition to the US where criminals are treaded in a manner designed to punish, not simply hold them in comfort.
It took far too long a long time, but after years the UK no longer has to fork out massive sums to hold him the manner he had become accustomed to, and he is now reaping the true consequences of his behaviour.
He fought long and hard...aided by the the incredible backlog in the legal system where defendants abuse human rights laws by dragging out their case.
One optiont is to do what other EU countries have done and simply ignore the European Court and deport their criminals. Another to replace everything with a British Bill of Rights.
Unfortunately the second option will be hijacked by our large numbers of woke huggyfeelys along with the numerous HR lawyers who live on the legal aid provided to these criminals.
one only has to look at the example of the difficulties presently being experienced to legacy deport the huge number of illegal immigrants to this country who the minute they arrive are supported, unlike the struggle facing those who comply with the law and come here legally.
It is indeed perverse.
Surely if people from that part of the world enrich this one so well, they'd be delighted to be sent back?Unfortunately it appears none will be deported due to consideration for their 'human rights'
![]()
Leader of grooming gang - dubbed 'The Master' - wins fight against deportation
An Immigration Tribunal heard that, as 51-year-old Abdul Aziz would not lose his citizenship, it would therefore be wrong to deport two other gang members fighting to stay in the UKwww.mirror.co.uk
This despite their complete disregard for the 'human rights' of the hundreds of underage girls they regularly abused.
That is where the deterrence factor kick in.Abu Hamza may well wish he was dead at this stage. Life in Supermax in isolation, , almost no fresh air or sunshine, hooks taken away, and supposedly going blind in his cell. It took far too long for him to face a punishment that the crime merited.
![]()
Hate preacher Abu Hamza 'losing eyesight due to Covid' and wants to return to UK
Abu Hamza, 62, is said to have told a court he has 'untreated vision decay' which might be linked to catching coronavirus. He is currently serving life in jail in a US prisonwww.mirror.co.uk
That is where the deterrence factor kick in.
Over there he he will regret he transgressed the hospitality and tolerance he was shown, to a greater degree than he did over here.
Unfortunately the criminal justice system over here remains a soft touch.
It has been said, 'hard time produce hard men'...One sincerely hopes so because so far it produced only a massive weeping, wailing, and striking, by soft, woke, bunny hugging snowflakes, who don't know how good they have had it compared to most of the rest of the world.
I’m not sure that’s what was being said.I have to disagree; removing all human rights from criminals is a step too far. The fact that a mass murderer is not punished (let alone strung up from a tree) without due process is a bedrock of civil society, there are places in the world you can go and live under those (lack of) rules, none of them very nice. That is not to say that there are not serious problems with how our legal system operates which need to dealt with, but throwing the baby out with the bath water is just not a viable answer.
Presumption of innocence, the right to a trial, prisoners' rights, all of these things mean that if you are falsely accused you will probably not go to prison and will almost definitely live to tell the tale. If the price for that is that rape gang members don't get murdered, I can live with it.
I want the perpetrators of the rapes punished and where possible deported; if that cannot happen then there is something wrong with the system, but it doesn't mean that we should bin the lot and start slaughtering those who we think did it, which is what removing all human rights leads to..