Discussion in 'Afghanistan' started by jumpinjarhead, Sep 5, 2010.
The heart of the site is the forum area, including:
Manning sounds like a good bloke.
I wonder how well he'd have done with his hands tied by political masters and only 10% of the forces needed to safely complete the mission?
Perhaps (highly unlikely) some of these reports should filter back into the mainstream media here in the UK, for once highlighting how our 'war on a budget' is not only costing lives but making us look like incompetent idiots in front of our allies, we are making good progress into becoming a laughing stock in the region, we half-arsed Basra and by the look of things will not be participating in combat operations in Helmand within a few years and not because the job is done or that we have reached some form of success at great cost but because it's either too expensive or there is an election coming.
All well and good but how will the families of the dead and the hundreds of men and women now minus bits of themselves feel when it was all for nothing but a bad reputation and the shame of retreat, or withdrawal in tune with media friendly spin.
Good to see the spams re writing history already- that they had to save Basra in 2007.
Load of bollocks and more reason to abandon the speshul relation ship- it's run it's course and is now finished.
The top Marine commander in Helmand, Maj. Gen. Richard Mills
He keeps a wooden sign in a trunk in his office that reads, "Promise Everything, Deliver Nothing." He said he found it in an encampment that British engineers had vacated. "That was their attitude," he said.
Nice to see he found someones sarcastic outlook on the afghan way and thinks it real
An unpalatable read JJH, which deserves further reflection rather than dismissing it as prejudice against the Brits.
Whilst clearly the UK does not have the resources of our sceptical cousins, its absurd that we perpetuate the fallacy of our capacity with PRTs.
Mannings scepticism is not misplaced.
Lest we forget it was the FCO who volunteered the UK to take the lead on poppy eradication in 2002, and look how that turned out.
However all these tactical stories tend to overlook the elephant in the room that we are fighting to preserve Karzais kleptocracy, which has no credibility with the afghan people unless they themselves are on his payroll.
The run on the Kabul Bank last week showed the peoples confidence in his brothers bank
From the same paper & the same day
U.S. To Tolerate Corruption In Latest Afghan Strategy
Yes, I have no doubt whatever that an officer of his experience would form his opinions, and more importantly his actions in the field, solely on a sign, the likes of which can be found in every USMC (and from my own experience other services) support unit and that he has no doubt seen before for what it is.
Could it possibly (and I know this is a reach for some on here) that there may be a bit more than SEPTIC/SPAM or whatever arrogance, stupidity, and anti-UK bias at play that warrants at least a discussion, if not introspection?
I would hope that by now no ARRSER would equate my merely posting an article from any news source, much less the Washington (Com)post, as being authoritative on the subject or as representing my views.
You're right JJ, a bit of introspection is called for.
Ironically, that goes both ways and I'm sure it won't be long before you tire of fielding deserved criticism and level the accusation of anti-spam bias...
Well at least our British actors will be busy once the Hollywood films come out
2 Foot wide beret,jump wings on the wrong arm and cut glass English accent with a hint of Dick Van Dyke Cock a knee
"We don't patrol out there me old septic mate it's full of taliban and it's how we did it in Northan Earland me ol muccka"
Cue bronzed Jar Head with perfect teath and a cigar
"The hell we will the Marines are here to stay Taliban are pussies OOOOrrrraaaahhhhh"
Lt. Col. Michael Manning is the Officer quoted, his Boss actually said this
Since they have been there since March in strength. Is it only natural, for comparisons to become twisted suiting the reporters agenda or the Editors aim.
Actually, and I realiz(s)e it may come as a bit of a shock given the suggestion of your clever post that we SPAMS are incapable of such things, I have already discerned the two-way phenomenon of which you speak and have actually "fielded deserved criticism" and even (gasp) agreed with some of it. I have also already noted the anti-spam bias of some posters but in so noting it, I do try to avoid the incredible broadsides that characteriz(s)e their irrationality.
Indeed so. A blockbuster in the making.
Surely you are not suggesting the Washington (Com)post would stoop to such manipulations to drive a wedge between allies? Oh the journalistic horror! I am also confident that a paper of such "high" standing would never stoop to including tasty little bits aimed at stirring up the feelings of its readers.
a story to sell papers and start the outrage bus, load of bollocks and im sure the people that really know a thing or two know the same
Separate names with a comma.