Trump Acquited - "Not guitly due to insufficient votes"

[RoofRat]

I have an ex-pat (now US citizen) friend who lives in Wilson N.Carolina,he is an ardent Trump fan,along with most of the town and, the reason is simple.

Prior to Trump's Presidential race, Wilson was inundated by the back end of one of these massive tropical storms. They had flooding all over the State,plus storm damaged buildings. The Governor declared a State of Emergency and, asked Washington (Obama) for assistance. 7 days later,still nothing from Washington when all of a sudden, a fleet of articulated lorries rolled into town,accompanied by a complete emergency medical facility.

7 days later,after the floodwater receded and, normal supplies could get through,4 articulated lorries with a big FEMA logo on the side,pulled up to the State Capitol (for the phot opp). At the same time,the medical facility was being packed away and, the the first lorry fleet was pulling out. One of the local law enforcement officers flagged down a truck that was leaving and thanked the driver for his efforts "whichever government agency you work for" ! He was politely informed that, the aid had been down to Donald Trump...and, not just in that State either !

Trump has helped numerous communities and, individuals with no fanfare...that's why a massive amount of ordinary americans voted for him.

No,I'm not a Trump fan,I find him loud,undiplomatic and, obnoxious...all traits that ordinarily I detest but, Just what the swamp in Washington needed,I would put money on him running again...and winning,after 4 years of Biden et al !

 

[vvaannmmaann]

Go back and read the post I quoted. Feel free to respond to him rather than me

Sent from my G8441 using Tapatalk

You brought up “tweets and speeches” and their admissibility.

 

[CRmeansCeilingReached]

You brought up “tweets and speeches” and their admissibility.

Sorry, confused. Are you saying that tweets and recorded speeches are not admissible in court?

Sent from my G8441 using Tapatalk

 

[Emcon Ecomcon]

You forgetting all those tweets and speeches from the President's own hand or mouth? Are you saying they aren't admissible?

Sent from my G8441 using Tapatalk

All those tweets and speeches in context have innocent explanations, but grouped create a false picture and only one encouraged people to break the law ???? that incident, was a joke to stop idiots throwing tomatoes/eggs and would NOT be admissable in a court, because it happened four years ago and had bot all to do with the 'insurrection'.

Evidence has to be closely aligned with the charges and its an odd insurrection, as you and the media appear to believe he has been planning the insurrection since before the 2016 election. The courts would laugh you out of court with that one !

The 'no fraud' is a mantra based on the courts not recognising the evidence and so there is no evidence. Why does your side not apply the same standards when it falls in Trumps Favour ?

 

[headgear]

A real journalist lays out the timeline of the Russian Collusion hoax and the Obama govts involvement in attempting to undercut his entire presidency and/or remove Trump from power - just think how much of a hinderance this was to the Trump presidency and the amount of time, cost and effort it soaked up. The media also used it to attack trump 24/7 and successfully poison the electorate against him from the outset.

Twenty days of infamy: the January 2017 red flags the FBI blew past on Russia collusion

Declassified memos details evidence that devastated FBI theories on Trump ... but did not stop the probe.

justthenews.com

 

[CRmeansCeilingReached]

none of them were anywhere near calling for an insurrection! - the capital incident was a riot, nothing more nothing less and the only incident where a MAGA rally got out of hand.

As witnessed as the impeachment 2.0 sham, Trumps rhetoric was in no way any worse than the 10 min video of democrat politicians and celebrities who actually called for violence! - in actual fact he never crossed that Rubicon. The Democrat impeachment prosecutors completely lost their case by the clear, unequivocal documented video and text evidence of their own side being publicly shown without the filter of protection the MMS gives them.

When a 'proper' investigation is carried out we will find that Nancy Pelosi, Mitch McConnell and the mayor of Washington are all to blame for refusing to accept the 10000 NG troops Trump offered them (not something an insurrectionist would have done!) and also for rejecting the Capitol Polices repeated requests for support prior too and also on the day. The 6 Jan was totally avoidable and the most culpable people are Pelosi and McConnell who are ultimately responsible for the capitol security, along with a few agitators in the crowd - one of whom is a proven Antifa leader who was paid $35.000 each by 2 mainstream media channels when he appeared on their shows afterwards and played the videos he took when he was orchestrating and cheering on the crowds inside the capitol building.

What's the weather like on your planet?

 

[vvaannmmaann]

Sorry, confused. Are you saying that tweets and recorded speeches are not admissible in court?

Sent from my G8441 using Tapatalk

I'm not an expert on the American legal system, so I cannot comment on that. I am saying an Impeachment Is a Political Process, Not a Judicial One.

 

[Emcon Ecomcon]

A real journalist lays out the timeline of the Russian Collusion hoax and the Obama govts involvement in attempting to undercut his entire presidency and/or remove Trump from power - just think how much of a hinderance this was to the Trump presidency and the amount of time, cost and effort it soaked up. The media also used it to attack trump 24/7 and successfully poison the electorate against him from the outset.

Twenty days of infamy: the January 2017 red flags the FBI blew past on Russia collusion

Declassified memos details evidence that devastated FBI theories on Trump ... but did not stop the probe.

justthenews.com

It started with the fraudulent election in 2016, with the russians who stole it without evidence and that conspiracy was and remains a conspiracy that is accepted as fact. The entire process of agitprop is designed to accentuate peoples doubts and weaken trust. The FBI in particular, have being hyper partisan in recent times and that is deeply damaging to public confidence.

 

[labrat]

Interesting article in the Indy - now openly laying it out that the ‘equipped with zip ties’ was bollocks, and that the policeman who died after being attacked with a fire extinguisher, wasn’t.

Patrick Cockburn: US media reports of invasion of the Capitol have contributed to the spread of violence and fear

The decline of journalism in America is made clear by the reporting of the attack

www.independent.co.uk

 

[CRmeansCeilingReached]

The FBI in particular, have being hyper partisan in recent times and that is deeply damaging to public confidence.

Partisan in which direction?

 

[Emcon Ecomcon]

Interesting article in the Indy - now openly laying it out that the ‘equipped with zip ties’ was bollocks, and that the policeman who died after being attacked with a fire extinguisher, wasn’t.

Patrick Cockburn: US media reports of invasion of the Capitol have contributed to the spread of violence and fear

The decline of journalism in America is made clear by the reporting of the attack

www.independent.co.uk

The media are as big a failures in this morality play; as the FBI/Capitol Police. Or even politicians for been unable to understand, or talk down the 'occupy capitol' protest. The entire aim has been to lump the blame onto Trump(he certainly has some responsibility) and pretty much any facts that place the blame entirely on trump have been welded onto the shiny insurrection narrative.

 

[labrat]

another whoops:

Ex-Capitol Police chief did not get FBI report warning of violence on Jan. 6

Former Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund on Tuesday told lawmakers he did not receive a copy of an FBI report warning of violence that was issued the day before the attack on the Capitol.

thehill.com

 

[CRmeansCeilingReached]

The FBI in particular, have being hyper partisan in recent times and that is deeply damaging to public confidence.

I notice you gave my question earlier a "funny" but haven't answered the question, so just to check. Partisan in which direction?

 

[Boumer]

Shouldn't you be on a QAnon website somewhere?

Keep Up. It doesn't exist and I assume never did, but if it existed it was a false-flag.

 

[Emcon Ecomcon]

I notice you gave my question earlier a "funny" but haven't answered the question, so just to check. Partisan in which direction?

See: FBI and Russian collusion, with dubious warrants, or sitting on the hunter biden laptop ? so work it out yourself.

 

[old_n_fat]

Partisan in which direction?

If you genuinely care, have a look here.


Should take you to a series of videos on the Flynn, Crossfire Hurricane debacle. People should end up in prison

Edit to add, in short
The FBI lied to obtain FISA warrants to go after Flynn on spurious Russian interference allegations

The FBI went after Flynn under the Logan act at the recommendation of Joe Biden, during a meeting between the head of the FBI and Obama.

An FBI lawyer falsified documents and admitted to doing so in court where he was found guilty of tampering with the documentation

The FBI investigation could find no evidence against Flynn and recommended closing the case but were overruled by the Director FBI

The Deputy Director of the FBI sent dozens of tweets to his girlfriend stating how they were going to get Trump

There’s lots more if you care to watch the admittedly hours of video showing high level corruption at the FBI, with the relevant references and copies of documents.

But you probably won't because orange man bad.

 

[CRmeansCeilingReached]

See: FBI and Russian collusion, with dubious warrants, or sitting on the hunter biden laptop ? so work it out yourself.

If you genuinely care, have a look here.

But you probably won't because orange man bad.

Or you could read the Department of Justice investigation reports, conducted during Trump's presidency in 2018?

Yeah, the DOJ reports which did not support "FBI is anti-Trump" allegations, but found anti-Clinton bias... and instead criticised the FBI director for breaching protocol by announcing the re-opening of the investigation into Hilary Clinton shortly before the 2016 election... which Comey only announced because of fears that anti-Hilary senior FBI officials would leak it to the press if he didn't.

Don't tell me - all Fake News

 

[dogmeat]

Can I just say what an uplifting, nay, heart-warming sight it is watching two bald men fighting over a comb.

 

[Emcon Ecomcon]

Or you could read the Department of Justice investigation reports, conducted during Trump's presidency in 2018?

Yeah, the DOJ reports which did not support "FBI is anti-Trump" allegations, but found anti-Clinton bias... and instead criticised the FBI director for breaching protocol by announcing the re-opening of the investigation into Hilary Clinton shortly before the 2016 election... which Comey only announced because of fears that anti-Hilary senior FBI officials would leak it to the press if he didn't.

Don't tell me - all Fake News

Anti-Clinton bias was simply the product of the FBIs lack of total devotion. The Trump victory in 2016 changed everything and made allies of all, in a noble rebel alliance against the evil orange emperor.

 

[old_n_fat]

Or you could read the Department of Justice investigation reports, conducted during Trump's presidency in 2018?

Yeah, the DOJ reports which did not support "FBI is anti-Trump" allegations, but found anti-Clinton bias... and instead criticised the FBI director for breaching protocol by announcing the re-opening of the investigation into Hilary Clinton shortly before the 2016 election... which Comey only announced because of fears that anti-Hilary senior FBI officials would leak it to the press if he didn't.

Don't tell me - all Fake News

You didn't watch any did you?