Troops May Protect Power Plants
- Thread starter RFUK
- Start date
Chalky
LE
RFUK said:
It would come under MACP, as the 'defence' of Heathrow airport sort of did.
If it was a major issue the TA might be tasked in support of it, simply because of the numbers required, which would probably involve sitting in a ditch a mile away drinking tea until the 'crisis' is over and leaving all the close up stuff to the Plod.
Dont know about the rest of the country but the local news here in Norfolk are reporting that MOD Plod are being deployed to protect the Bacton Gas Terminal and apprantly the Gas companies are going to be picking up the tab.
I was getting rather worried about STABs running around thinking their the SAS.
I was getting rather worried about STABs running around thinking their the SAS.
TPR_C_Hunt
Old-Salt
They have CCRF, so they know how to stag on a cordon 
gennithmedic
War Hero
Genuine Question
With tha army as overstretched as it is, just what are those 20,000 odd blokes doing in the BAOR?
What could they achieve that pointing nukes at Dresden wouldn't? It must be an expensive place to train in.
Am I just being fick, and missing a really obvious GOOD reason for all that manpower out in Germany.
With tha army as overstretched as it is, just what are those 20,000 odd blokes doing in the BAOR?
What could they achieve that pointing nukes at Dresden wouldn't? It must be an expensive place to train in.
Am I just being fick, and missing a really obvious GOOD reason for all that manpower out in Germany.
Modfather
Old-Salt
I think they have already started guarding Gas lines. In my local town I spotted four blokes stood round a hole in the ground looking down at a gas pipe - none of them looked to be busy working so I suspect they were highly trained killers protecting the national assets! I established an OP in the local coffee shop and confimed that all four appears to know sod all about the gas pipe.
(The fact they had British Gas on their HV vests was a simple decoy because all four of the were wearing DMP trousers and boots).
(The fact they had British Gas on their HV vests was a simple decoy because all four of the were wearing DMP trousers and boots).
Darthspud
LE
thought that was war role for certain units, wouldn't take much for the govt. to change terms of reference so troops could be used in 'terrorist emergencies'
I'm sure RAF Regt (uk units) were tasked with this type of role in early-mid 80's, Defence of pipelines/pumping stations and bulk storage facilities might be within their capabilities
I'm sure RAF Regt (uk units) were tasked with this type of role in early-mid 80's, Defence of pipelines/pumping stations and bulk storage facilities might be within their capabilities
Percy_Pigeon
War Hero
What goes around comes around site guard
Bring back the old days
Bring back the old days
brettarider
LE
Were would you put th 20,000 plus families etc all? the MoD is selling off land. No money to repair the current accom blocks never mind build a new camp and houses were would the kids go to school you would need new ones building along with doctors etc as the local infrastructure couldn't cope over crowded class rooms etc. Training area's suddenly booked solid and units unable to get on them etc.gennithmedic said:
Do you think that Broon hasn't already looked at this in the past 10 years? I remember making this as a passing comment in the cook house back in 1998 nearly got laughed out for being stupid even thought it was a tongue in cheek comment.
As for the the rest of the thread sounds like HSF again
semper
LE
I know I was being flippant, earlier on. 
This is a serious reply :
Where will the men come from ? the TA might have done it as many of them live right the doorstep of some of these places, however many have already been deployed and is back home probably in no mood to do extra work at home unless it instead of going to Iraq and Afghanistan.
That will leave the Regs, one problem if they are asked to do more for less as is the TA as well, then some will probably vote with thier feets, I admire many squaddies ability to put up with a lot of crap, I am sure some already have limits and is past them, Broon will have to start putting money where his mouth is,
we are already talking about him as if he is already a PM and Bliar is an irrelevent lame duck.
on another note:
The ACF adults may live in these localities, they are however not trained for these roles.
This is a serious reply :
Where will the men come from ? the TA might have done it as many of them live right the doorstep of some of these places, however many have already been deployed and is back home probably in no mood to do extra work at home unless it instead of going to Iraq and Afghanistan.
That will leave the Regs, one problem if they are asked to do more for less as is the TA as well, then some will probably vote with thier feets, I admire many squaddies ability to put up with a lot of crap, I am sure some already have limits and is past them, Broon will have to start putting money where his mouth is,
we are already talking about him as if he is already a PM and Bliar is an irrelevent lame duck.
on another note:
The ACF adults may live in these localities, they are however not trained for these roles.
brettarider
LE
Want that the whole point of the HSF ex forces/TA & cadet AI's? could apply up to the age of 55 for this purpose
Sneezeclown
Clanker
Pling said:
So that wouldn't be 21 or 23 then?
Sammy The Cat
War Hero
gennithmedic said:
What?
They are doing training, routine work, roulement tours, indvidual reiforcements and leave - the same as the rest of the army.
Nukes at Dresden? What's all that about?
MikeMcc
LE
Thinking back to Brave Defender it scares the sh1t out of me. We got tasked as a mobile to go to a building 'defended' by the HSF. We got there, jumped out of the rover and the tw@ts immediately let rip with a few hundred rounds! I know they were probably hyped up because it was an exercise and you know you're going to get tested on it but it was bl00dy ridiculous.
Yokel
LE
Odd that the Government seem to consider it wise to plan to use troops to defend energy infrastructure in the UK, but seem to ignore the possible need to protect shipping elsewhere. Things will happen in the Gulf in the next couple of years. The nuclear stand off my lead to an Israeli or US strike, Tehran may decide to hit back at the international community for imposing sanctions, or (as seems likely) Iran and Saudi Arabia will come to blows.
Shipping in the Gulf will need to be defended - which might be tricky with a Fleet considerably smaller than we need. Admiral West said we need "about thirty" frigates and destroyers. Have we got about thirty? No!
What if Tehran decides that seaborne resupply to forces in Iraq will cease? Having to defend convoys for a thousand miles, looking out for submarines, mines, shore based missiles, missile armed attack craft, aircraft (some with anti ship missiles).....
Shipping in the Gulf will need to be defended - which might be tricky with a Fleet considerably smaller than we need. Admiral West said we need "about thirty" frigates and destroyers. Have we got about thirty? No!
What if Tehran decides that seaborne resupply to forces in Iraq will cease? Having to defend convoys for a thousand miles, looking out for submarines, mines, shore based missiles, missile armed attack craft, aircraft (some with anti ship missiles).....
crabtastic
LE
brettarider said:
You could bus them over to a truck park at Zeebrugge, give them a Stanley knife each, tell them to hop on a trailer and then tell them when they get to the other side to start speaking with Albanian accents.
Latest Threads
-
Information / guidance sought- Started by Dicky Ticker
- Replies: 3
-
-
-
Royal Air Force Rapid Capabilities Office announce review of Project Mosquito- Started by MoD_RSS
- Replies: 13
-
