Union Jack
War Hero

Has the colour of the hat been mentioned anywhere?Rumour control would have it there are two names in the hat, as above several posts… ( and Guido of course)
Jack
Has the colour of the hat been mentioned anywhere?Rumour control would have it there are two names in the hat, as above several posts… ( and Guido of course)
I Wonder if the porn was worth itHas the colour of the hat been mentioned anywhere?
Jack
Rolf just got goosedSpeaking to a childhood mate about this last night. These are comments from one of his constituents (these rumours certainly amused me - and the allegation about orgies reminded me a bit of the Hungarian MEP that got caught at the orgy during lockdown in Brussels):
View attachment 664173
There is also this rather unfortunate photo:
View attachment 664174
"to work "in and around him""Speaking to a childhood mate about this last night. These are comments from one of his constituents (these rumours certainly amused me - and the allegation about orgies reminded me a bit of the Hungarian MEP that got caught at the orgy during lockdown in Brussels):
View attachment 664173
There is also this rather unfortunate photo:
View attachment 664174
Fixed...Spurned lover now crying hamster ?
Fantastic idea other than the word "secret". Human rights unwashed types don't like that word and would likely whinge a bit. Call it "special" and you'd upset the spackers. I think the only way is to make up a jury of only those convicted of serious sexual crimes but outside of their conviction liabilities - that way we could finally make something wholly inclusive and representative of society as a whole and surely no one could complain.All very odd.
Perhaps allegations of historical sexual abuse should initially be presented to a secret grand jury. They could discretely filter out the crank cases, and approve the complaints where there is a case to answer.
The Crown might have saved itself a lot of humiliation - and money - over the last few years.
Fantastic idea other than the word "secret". Human rights unwashed types don't like that word and would likely whinge a bit. Call it "special" and you'd upset the spackers. I think the only way is to make up a jury of only those convicted of serious sexual crimes but outside of their conviction liabilities - that way we could finally make something wholly inclusive and representative of society as a whole and surely no one could complain.
birth certificates, for startersWhat sort of evidence is required in these cases?