One of the failings of Western Democracy in my opinion, is the failure to admit that odious regimes can work.
In our hubris we have often removed regimes that we don't like, such as Saddam, because they don't fit in with our values and standards.
The fact that countries under these regimes manage to function, and tend to fail as a State when those regimes are removed escapes our leaders.
De-Ba'athification was a catastrophe, for example, despite stemming from noble aims as removing the "strong men" led to internecine strife and thousands of deaths.
We are now faced with an odious regime being the de facto government of Afghanistan, a country that faces biblical levels of poverty and imminent famine.
Although HMG provides aid (see below) , its sticking a plaster on a sucking chest wound.
HMG and the UN refuse to deal with the Taliban. The UN has imposed asset freezes on Afghanistan. There are no humanitarian exemptions to the sanctions regime placed on the Taliban in 2015.
The UN will provide aid ( see below) but will not unfreeze $9.5 bn of Afghan assets. Aid is not enough, the country is on the edge of collapse and faces tens or even hundreds of thousands of deaths from starvation.
The regime in power is odious to our standards, but we need to face reality and accept the Taliban are in charge. The West spent $3 trillion replacing the Taliban with the Taliban: its time we faced reality and realised that sticking to the high moral ground will lead to deaths on a scale that would make African famines look like detox.
Foreign Secretary Liz Truss has pledged £97 million of emergency UK aid to the Afghan people to provide life-saving food and emergency health support.
www.gov.uk
Resolution says aid will support ‘basic human needs’ and will not violate sanctions imposed on Taliban-linked entities.
www.aljazeera.com