Threads Disappear Without Explanation

[rampant]

THE BBC are anti white male and anti British, you only need to look at some of the crap TV programs they produce and they are blatantly biased to against Brexit and pro EU.

A person or organisation may posess a bias (n), which means they can biased (v) towards or against a particular thing.

Sorry that is an itch I have needed to scratch for a long time

 

[Anonymous Yank]

Whilst I have no dog in this fight I completely fail to see how you can produce such a spurious conclusion based on the information contained in the standards for CA that CLC posted.

Did you read as far as the comments from ViroBono?

A moderator of CA who left the site for several reasons, one of which was that he was so sick of moderating CA, a forum with strict rules compared to the rest of this site, and having to be constantly removing drivel.

As mentioned by @Sixty , which part of the single statement of Are you all deaded yet do you think complied with the rules of CA by posting a newsworthy item, followed by your comments/analysis on the news item and inviting other members to add their comments, all free from silliness, abuse, swearwords, and pathetic memes?

My wishes for a happy Brexit day to all, and my not completely serious question as to everyone's wellbeing after such event where so much gloom and doom has been predicted, was precisely compliant, being topical, current, and a reflection on the political climate.

As to your quoting of Sixty trying to justify his miserable existence and tactics, I already answered him. And you, of course have "no dog in the fight" anyway, right?

In any case, this is not about only this particular instance of abuse and shaping of content by Sixty by a long shot, and his "long service" doesn't gain any sympathy from me when it is also historically detrimental. Therefore, you can **** right off trying to white knight his worthless arse.

Show me where I am not following the accepted, ancient, and established customs of ArRSe...

 

[guzzijon]

What happened to @Ravers’ thread about the local idiot who was treating the road as a race track/crash area? It was just getting interesting and then Phut! – it was gone.

Maybe the OP decided that it wasn’t the best idea in the world- from a not dropping oneself in the shit perpective?

 

[Sixty]

My wishes for a happy Brexit day to all, and my not completely serious question as to everyone's wellbeing after such event where so much gloom and doom has been predicted, was precisely compliant, being topical, current, and a reflection on the political climate.

As to your quoting of Sixty trying to justify his miserable existence and tactics, I already answered him. And you, of course have "no dog in the fight" anyway, right?

In any case, this is not about only this particular instance of abuse and shaping of content by Sixty by a long shot, and his "long service" doesn't gain any sympathy from me when it is also historically detrimental. Therefore, you can **** right off trying to white knight his worthless arse.

Show me where I am not following the accepted, ancient, and established customs of ArRSe...

View attachment 447540

View attachment 447541

Those are both in the Int Cell where the CA standards don't apply. You're really not very bright, are you?

 

[Anonymous Yank]

Those are both in the Int Cell where the CA standards don't apply. You're really not very bright, are you?

I did leave the Int Cell sub-headers in the cropped screenshots. Wouldn't want to be accused of being deceptively selective, like you.

There are plenty of threads in the CA where posters drop plenty of bullshit lies and ad hom that you conveniently ignore, but definitely don't ignore those same posters when "their feelings get hurt."

Those CA rules you selectively choose to enforce where originally styled in the manner to protect the public image and revenue stream of ArRSe. You apparently choose to mould that image to your preference, leaving lies, misinformation and ad homs that suit your personal sensibilities, and only prune that which you disagree with.

Disappearing a thread has the convenient, underhanded advantage of removing the ability to report directly about that thread for any purpose, unlike moving it. Not that reporting your shiftless activities would amount to much.

So, yes. Maybe I am not very bright in that I actually care a little bit about ArRSe when you, Minimus Sub-Prime, apparently care very little about it other than what it can do for reinforcing your stunted world-view.

 

[Sixty]

I did leave the Int Cell sub-headers in the cropped screenshots. Wouldn't want to be accused of being deceptively selective, like you.

There are plenty of threads in the CA where posters drop plenty of bullshit lies and ad hom that you conveniently ignore, but definitely don't ignore those same posters when "their feelings get hurt."

Those CA rules you selectively choose to enforce where originally styled in the manner to protect the public image and revenue stream of ArRSe. You apparently choose to mould that image to your preference, leaving lies, misinformation and ad homs that suit your personal sensibilities, and only prune that which you disagree with.

Disappearing a thread has the convenient, underhanded advantage of removing the ability to report directly about that thread for any purpose, unlike moving it. Not that reporting your shiftless activities would amount to much.

So, yes. Maybe I am not very bright in that I actually care a little bit about ArRSe when you, Minimus Sub-Prime, apparently care very little about it other than what it can do for reinforcing your stunted world-view.

Were you a bit weepy when you typed that?

 

[Sixty]

Apropos of nothing; ‘Tears of an Illiterate Colonial’ would be a fantastic name for an indie band.

 

[Anonymous Yank]

Were you a bit weepy when you typed that?

Asks the definitely not sad and incompetent twat who would never ever complain about too many of the wrong people using the report button.

Me? Not at all.

 

[Club Swinger]

I did leave the Int Cell sub-headers in the cropped screenshots. Wouldn't want to be accused of being deceptively selective, like you.

There are plenty of threads in the CA where posters drop plenty of bullshit lies and ad hom that you conveniently ignore, but definitely don't ignore those same posters when "their feelings get hurt."

Those CA rules you selectively choose to enforce where originally styled in the manner to protect the public image and revenue stream of ArRSe. You apparently choose to mould that image to your preference, leaving lies, misinformation and ad homs that suit your personal sensibilities, and only prune that which you disagree with.

Disappearing a thread has the convenient, underhanded advantage of removing the ability to report directly about that thread for any purpose, unlike moving it. Not that reporting your shiftless activities would amount to much.

So, yes. Maybe I am not very bright in that I actually care a little bit about ArRSe when you, Minimus Sub-Prime, apparently care very little about it other than what it can do for reinforcing your stunted world-view.

Ooooh, keep this up and you could end up on the naughty step....

 

[Club Swinger]

Asks the definitely not sad and incompetent twat who would never ever complain about too many of the wrong people using the report button.

Me? Not at all.

That ought to do it.

 

[Anonymous Yank]

That ought to do it.

 

[Anonymous Yank]

 

[BugsyIV]

View attachment 447718

You soppy cùnt