Which prompted me to look at the regulations on pedestrian crossings.OK, do I run somebody over on that crossing. Sorry Hossifer, but he was in the middle of the road and that ain't a black and white Zebra crossing is it.
You're correct, it doesn't comply but the link you gave is badly out of date.Which prompted me to look at the regulations on pedestrian crossings.
The "rainbow" crossing would appear not to comply with the requirements of the regulation.
The congenital idiot who harassed Mr Miller said:
According to court papers, the constable explained to him: 'Sometimes, a woman's brain grows a man's body in the womb and that is what transgender is.'
Where on earth do they unearth these half-wits?
In fairness to the police, its MPs who pass virtue-signalling and other laws which the police then try to enforce.
Humberside police, the force in whose area this case arose, was found in 2018 to need to improve performance in preventing crime and keeping people safe. The allocation of resources to this case therefore seems wrong. It is however MPs who keep passing laws which require police to act.
It doesn't have to be just the five stated. Its what anyone believes to be a hate incident. BB calling peaple old white gammon could be classed as a hate incident.Police are required by law to record any hate incident or crime. There are 5 mandatory protected characteristics - religion,disability,gender...etc. Forces can also include others such as...being a goth for example. If ANY person, be it the so called victim, or an onlooker deems a hate crime/incident to have occurred and report it, police are required by home office counting rules to record it. If Jarrod called the police and said “a bloke in town barged past me today...I think he did it because I’m gay”...police have no option but to record as either hate crime or incident. If an onlooker saw a bloke barge past an Asian on an escalator during rush hour, and reported he thought he was barged past because he was Asian...it has to be recorded.
This goes some way to explaining why the crime statistics, bbc type “hate crime has increased 20% since...” often appear to make out the UK is a stormfront enclave.
@Provost police don’t decide ...it’s a home office directive.
There is no such thing as a hate crime. There are normal crimes such as assault, public order, criminal damage which are racially agravated. Anybody can be a victim of such crimes i.e. a black person racially abusing a white person as in Racially agravated Section 4a Public Order Act 1986.There are also a lot of people who fall under the “protected characteristics” who misunderstand the law. Many assume ANY offence committed against them constitutes a hate crime automatically- and report it as such. ...Still has to be recorded as such.
To be proved in court it would have to be a hate crime. A hate incident is not a crime but is an incident which the informant thinks is motivated by race as described in the McPherson report. The Home Office have directed police to record these.True, Im not certain but, I don’t think hate incidents etc, unless proved in court, are for the eyes of anyone but police. Happy to be corrected.
Some of the highest scores on the breath machine in custody I came across were always women.Happened round our way recently. The driver was found not to be at fault and (once he'd recovered from his serious injuries) the pedestrian was told 'WTF did you expect, crossing a busy road, on a bend, at night, in the pishing rain, wearing dark clothing, without looking'. Even funnier was the woman who drove past the cones and traffic car with its blues on blocking the road and nearly ran one of the Rats (traffic officers) over. How we laughed as he asked 'Excuse me madam, but what are you doing?' (or words to that effect) I don't know what her reply was but his next phrase was [sniff, sniff] 'Have you been drinking?' She certainly had and I ended up taking her to custody whence she blew way over the limit and has been banned.
The worst things that happened in control rooms is when they stated putting civies in there. When it was police officers they would bat off a lot of the crap on the phone and no CAD would be created as they would not want to send their collegues to crap calls. With civies (police staff) It would be call in, CAD out, no matter what pants it was.Not at all, we had CAD, it’s just that back then coppers were allowed to use common sense, and to record and write incidents up properly. If you wrote things up accordingly no problem.
My personal rule was if in doubt, summons or arrest, take formal action and let some other bugger further up the pay scale make a final decision. Worked for me.
When I did the 'naughty boy for speeding' course most of the attendees were women. I remarked on the issue and the looks I got were definitely a hate crime.....so I followed it up with 'can't you count'? They all smiled....sheepishly.Some of the highest scores on the breath machine in custody I came across were always women.
One of the most useless organisations going in my opinion. In 27 years a didn't have one good word to say about them. A Fed PC on Chief Inspectors wages. Using subs to go on beanos in 5 star hotels all inclusive weekends.How do you know what The Police Federation do or do not do?
It’s not as if The MSM report day to day activity by them.
Wasn't it something to do with tuffty and the green cross code.About 10 pounds
So a light controlled crossing in the old days was called a Pelican crossing - You pressed the button and say the green man come on the opposite side of the road you crossed.
A Puffin - you press the button and the box next to you where you pressed the button will show a green man, and (normally)you will not see it across the road. The idea is that you are looking at the green man and at the traffic approaching at the same time.
Does that make sense? These have been around at least 15 years
Do you know what a Toucan crossin and, Pegasus crossing are?
With Dangerous and Careless Driving. With men its always Dangerous Driving and with Women its always Careless driving.When I did the 'naughty boy for speeding' course most of the attendees were women. I remarked on the issue and the looks I got were definitely a hate crime.....so I followed it up with 'can't you count'? They all smiled....sheepishly.
You deserve to burn in hell you soccer watching f%ck. Your team colors are gayer than aids btw.You know what we should do.
Any time a Vegan tells you off for eating meat call the police and report ot as a hate crime.
Any time a god botherer tells you you will go to hell - report it as a hate crime.
Any time someone tells you your football team is shite - report it as a hate crime.
I feel I can go on here a while
With my woman "the tree jumped out and hit the car" - I kid you not. On another occasion when she went straight into the back of a bright red car she said "who put rhat there?"With Dangerous and Careless Driving. With men its always Dangerous Driving and with Women its always Careless driving.