This is really annoying me...

Legs

ADC
Book Reviewer
#1
Why the hell can't BFBS (British FORCES Broadcasting Service), BBC and ITV newsreaders pronounce the word 'Anglians'? They keep on coming out with 'Royal Anglicans', which I find very disrespectful.

Don't they actually read their autocues?

Sorry, mini-rant, but it needed saying.
 
#2
It's probably a subliminal message that Rev. Dannatt, CGS, has ordered to be inserted into any broadcasts.

:D
 

cpunk

LE
Moderator
#3
I couldn't agree more. I heard a BBC journo describe a fatality as coming from the 'Royal Anglican Region' a week or so back, obviously clueless about the abbreviation that came up on her autocue. My plan is to email and complain next time I hear one of these gaffes, and tell them how disrespectful I find it. The BBC makes tremendous efforts to pronounce 'foreign' names correctly; they should extend the same courtesy to the British Army.
 
#4
Legs said:
Why the hell can't BFBS (British FORCES Broadcasting Service), BBC and ITV newsreaders pronounce the word 'Anglians'? They keep on coming out with 'Royal Anglicans', which I find very disrespectful.

Don't they actually read their autocues?

Sorry, mini-rant, but it needed saying.

Actually Legs if you listen carefully most of them can't get the names correct anyway ... Heard my own former comrades referred to the Irish Guard Regiment Battalion!!!
 

Arai

Old-Salt
#5
Are you listening you fcking press mongs? - its the ANGLIANS. MIght not mean much too you, but means a hell of a lot to us

fukcers

(rant over)
 
#7
barbarasson said:
They did it again on BBC news tonight.
What do you expect when half the presenters pronounce Canada as CANIDA?

Khunts.
 

cpunk

LE
Moderator
#8
barbarasson said:
They did it again on BBC news tonight.
Email them and tell them. It's not acceptable: if one of their sports journos persistently referred to Everton City, Liverpool United or Arsenal Hotspur, they'd soon get the boot. Personally, I think regimental KIAs are more important than that.
 
#10
laziness
 
#11
They also come out with the Royal Logistical Corps on many occasions.
I agree that if they can spend hours learning how to pronounce MUMBAI instead of Bombay or BEIJING instead of Peking, they can at least give the Forces the courtesy of getting the names right.
 
#12
cpunk said:
I couldn't agree more. I heard a BBC journo describe a fatality as coming from the 'Royal Anglican Region' a week or so back, obviously clueless about the abbreviation that came up on her autocue. My plan is to email and complain next time I hear one of these gaffes, and tell them how disrespectful I find it. The BBC makes tremendous efforts to pronounce 'foreign' names correctly; they should extend the same courtesy to the British Army.
"Afgwanistan" - probably, I know, phonetically correct, but bloody irritating.
 
#13
It's annoying I agree but not anywhere near as annoying as people who get gender re-assignment paid for by the army.
 
#14
Well at least the Gruniard have paid attention and amended their website.

This article was amended on Sunday August 19 2007. It is the Royal Anglian, not Royal Anglican Regiment. This has been amended.
Using their official complaints procedure, I've fired off a restrained but unambiguous missive to the BBC. When and if I receive a response, I'll post it on here.
 
#15
Legs said:
Why the hell can't BFBS (British FORCES Broadcasting Service), BBC and ITV newsreaders pronounce the word 'Anglians'? They keep on coming out with 'Royal Anglicans', which I find very disrespectful.

Don't they actually read their autocues?

Sorry, mini-rant, but it needed saying.
You have every right to have a rant about this.
In fact had I not already had enough on my plate to despair of, this comes as another side dish I could well do with out.
You tell me, that BRITISH (Fcuking) FORCES RADIO announcers can't or don't make a distinction between one who follows a particular brand of Christianity and those who come from the eastern flat lands of our island?

Really?
Tell you what mate, any country whose dedicated forces radio can't get that right is a country not worth fighting for.
 
#16
E-mailing can work. A while ago, when local radio in Plymouth described Army Commando casualties as Royal Marines on the 10 am news I e-mailed to put them right, and they had corrected the wording of the story for the next bulletin at 11. The media down here do it all the time, you'd think they would have switched on by now.
 
#17
goodkurtz said:
You tell me, that BRITISH (Fcuking) FORCES RADIO announcers can't or don't make a distinction between one who follows a particular brand of Christianity and those who come from the eastern flat lands of our island?

Really?
Tell you what mate, any country whose dedicated forces radio can't get that right is a country not worth fighting for.
Perhaps they think it's the paramilitary wing of the Church of England?

or the Church Militant?

Though I believe it's just a consequence of the general "dumbing down" in education and fall in standards brought about by the PC social engineers who run Britain nowadays.
 
#19
Anglican regiment? I didn't realize the Church of England possesed troops... :p
 
#20
Legs said:
Is it laziness or idiocy?
Both! Left leaning media scum who couldn't give a stuff about anything to do with the Army.

BBC TV as bad. We had from the grinning half-wit who presents rubgy on BBC announce ".......the arrival of the Welsh Guards' goat....".

Daily we get references to 'sekerterry' or 'sekerterries'.

The Torygraph can't even be bothered to get simple things like names or titles of regiments correct.

This country is 'cattle-trucked' - main architects Bliar & Brown.
 

Similar threads


New Posts

Latest Threads

Top