The Westminster pigs are back in the trough again…

Discussion in 'The Intelligence Cell' started by sunnoficarus, Oct 18, 2012.

Welcome to the Army Rumour Service, ARRSE

The UK's largest and busiest UNofficial military website.

The heart of the site is the forum area, including:

    • Like Like x 1
  1. How can it be a matter of security when constituents know the address of their surgeries and even the times the MP will be there?.They just do not want us to know the sordid details,again.
     
    • Like Like x 7
  2. Self serving bunch of wasters.
     
  3. Wordsmith

    Wordsmith LE Book Reviewer

    it is a security issue.

    JOB SECURITY...

    They'll be fcuked off at the next election if this comes out.

    Wordsmith
     
    • Like Like x 2
  4. Thieving bastards – will they never learn and they wonder why the country holds them in such contempt - The only time they will learn properly is when they hear the door bang and the keys rattle - SCUM BAGS
     
    • Like Like x 1
  5. fu2

    fu2 LE

    How does the saying go ? A Leopard can`t change it`s spots .
     
  6. Thanks for finding this, unfortunately GB didn't deal with it properly last time but I suppose if he had we would have lost much of parliament. They won't get voted out, one of the worst offenders of this cynical exploitation of expenses to effectively run a tax avoiding property development company was Hazel Blears and she got straight back in. If this sort of thing happened in any other job then the offender would be straight out. It's not unlike Widdicombe's speech where she points out that parliament make rules about what we cannot say in public or place of work but they are allowed to in their place of work, one rule for these bastards and one for us.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  7. The piggies never thought of leaving the trough. They worked out a new way to get into it. It's all within the rules (now who makes them) but they wouldn't like us mortals to know about it. Soon be time to start breaking the cobblestones out.
     
  8. What about the land register, doesn't that make Burcow's position meaningless?
    Struggling to see how knowing the landlord is a security risk compared to us already knowing the address. At the very least they should cap the amount of their housing allowance the same as housing benefit anyway.
     
  9. Two party system one party state.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  10. I think the land register only shows who owns a house.

    I've not read much about this but my understanding is that it involves MPs subletting properties to one another. If all of the rents are ultimately paid for by Parliament (a nice little earner in itself) I don't understand what the advantage is, unless the honourable members are charging one another inflated rents.
     
  11. Sympathetic_Reaction

    Sympathetic_Reaction LE Book Reviewer

    The advantage is that the rules were changed to stop members of parliment from claiming mortgage interest on their second homes, this was to stop them building up property empirs from tax payer money. What they are doing now is buying a second home, renting it to another MP using thier tax payer funded expenses, and therefore paying off the mortgage from the tax payer funded rent - basically achieving the same end state but via a different route. In theory 2 MP's could buy seperate properties, rent them out to each other and therefore have them both paid for by the tax payer and end up with a nice tax payer funded property at the end of thier term.

    S_R
     
    • Like Like x 2
  12. Wordsmith

    Wordsmith LE Book Reviewer

    Two northern MP's in safe seats each buy a house in London. They cannot expense the house as they are now not allowed to rent. So they each do a deal with each other to rent the others house as the place they'll stay in London when on parliamentary business. MP's mortgage costs on second homes are now being indirectly paid for by the tax payer.

    And if in fact the MP's colluded, they could both stay in one house (paid for by one set of rent) and rent out the second one purely for profit.

    No way of checking out the latter if addresses aren't known.

    Wordsmith
     
  13. Surely the Sunday papers will have the full story?
     
  14. FORMER_FYRDMAN

    FORMER_FYRDMAN LE Book Reviewer

    Hopefully one of those with access to the gruesome details will do the decent thing and bubble the offending parties like last time. If we're ever going to get our country back, the next round of cuts should involve a headsman and a very large axe.