Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Herrumph, post: 4534404, member: 22799"] The playing field was only leveled by AFCS 10 if you opted into it at the time, which in most cases you would have been mad to do. Most of those officers adversely affected by today's Redundancy terms will have been under the old arrangements and subject to the 16 years reckonable service, which was from age 21. So I think R_F is correct. Let's not forget that every AFPRB Report I read over 20 years talked in glowing terms of the military pension benefits and long term security of employment before using said facts as a reason to lower the x-factor. We may not have had a contract but it was definitely assumed that pensions and job security were a benefit. Dingerr - if it was you being affected, you would have been whinging like ****. [/QUOTE]