The UK/European migrant problem

Gotta be some questions there, starting with "What the hell happened to the Safeguarding system?".

The school I, briefly, worked for had a system where any concerns by any member of staff had to be escalated instantly to the safeguarding lead. I wasn't even dealing with students apart form working on the same site as them, and it was hammered into us.

Anyone who saw that bloke walk into a class should have flagged it as a concern right away. Now if they did, and the Safeguarding system said "All good, he's just had a hard paper round, dodging low flying Russian spy planes." Then there's some questions there as well.
The teachers wouldn't dare rock the boat, the parents would be dubbed bigots in a second. I suspect the kids drove this themselves and organised enough to get action, that resulted in a flap on and the asylum fella been shifted before something kicked off into something bigger.
 

Sent from my SM-A500FU using Tapatalk
There are threads about this, going back a couple of years now.

When we talked about an EU Army the Remainers talked about us being fantasists and being idiotic for even suggesting it.

Then evidence began to come out about it, and they said it’s ok, we wouldn’t ever join and neither would anyone else.

Then it was just a name for closer cooperation, the idea of an EU Army was ludicrous.

Now it’s that it’s not a ‘proper’ Army....we shouldn’t worry about it.

Next it’ll be ‘don’t worry it’ll never be deployed’...

Then it will be ‘it’ll never be used in anger’

At which point it’ll be too late.

Remainers are twats.
 
There are threads about this, going back a couple of years now.

When we talked about an EU Army the Remainers talked about us being fantasists and being idiotic for even suggesting it.

Then evidence began to come out about it, and they said it’s ok, we wouldn’t ever join and neither would anyone else.

Then it was just a name for closer cooperation, the idea of an EU Army was ludicrous.

Now it’s that it’s not a ‘proper’ Army....we shouldn’t worry about it.

Next it’ll be ‘don’t worry it’ll never be deployed’...

Then it will be ‘it’ll never be used in anger’

At which point it’ll be too late.

Remainers are twats.
It's the element of Merkel's speech which says:

EU army to suppliment Nato.

What a load of BS.

Sent from my SM-A500FU using Tapatalk
 

Joker62

ADC
Book Reviewer
Send the fùckers back to France to face charges of boat theft instead of housing them here!
Shame it wasn't sunk or got dragged down by a trapped trawler net.

Sent from my SM-A500FU using Tapatalk
 
Last edited:
There are threads about this, going back a couple of years now.

When we talked about an EU Army the Remainers talked about us being fantasists and being idiotic for even suggesting it.

Then evidence began to come out about it, and they said it’s ok, we wouldn’t ever join and neither would anyone else.

Then it was just a name for closer cooperation, the idea of an EU Army was ludicrous.

Now it’s that it’s not a ‘proper’ Army....we shouldn’t worry about it.

Next it’ll be ‘don’t worry it’ll never be deployed’...

Then it will be ‘it’ll never be used in anger’

At which point it’ll be too late.

Remainers are twats.
Dr5e4KtWkAIDzcN.jpg
 
I would remind you that the original purpose of the EU was always the formation of a European Super-State (which I will call for brevity the USoE). The federalists of the original 6 members kicked this off and it was sold to the UK and several other nations (including Italy) as a "common market" trading block.

If, however, you dig into the small print of the original EU treaty you will find that it was always the ultimate aim to achieve the USoE in order to compete directly with Russia and the USA.

The lie was sold to the UK when we opted in in 1973 by the arch-liar and predecessor to Tony Bliar Harold Wilson. Wilson the pipe-smoking Gannex wearing man of the people who was anything but, and in priate smoked cheroots and had a degree from Oxford. He also managed to dodge war service as a "political specialist" something which his Wiki entry glosses over.

Wilson also has a lot of parliamentary experience is obfusticating the truth and blocking bills he was apposed to by parliamentary procedure. Again glossed over in the Wiki entry.
 
Last edited:
There are threads about this, going back a couple of years now.

When we talked about an EU Army the Remainers talked about us being fantasists and being idiotic for even suggesting it.

Then evidence began to come out about it, and they said it’s ok, we wouldn’t ever join and neither would anyone else.

Then it was just a name for closer cooperation, the idea of an EU Army was ludicrous.

Now it’s that it’s not a ‘proper’ Army....we shouldn’t worry about it.

Next it’ll be ‘don’t worry it’ll never be deployed’...

Then it will be ‘it’ll never be used in anger’

At which point it’ll be too late.

Remainers are twats.
Good stuff and calls out a certain breed of gobs**te from this site, who parrot the establishment line.
 
Good stuff and calls out a certain breed of gobs**te from this site, who parrot the establishment line.
The . . . Establishment Apologist Useful Idiots . . . .

. . . . (Registered Trade Mark Pending :) ).
 
There are threads about this, going back a couple of years now.

When we talked about an EU Army the Remainers talked about us being fantasists and being idiotic for even suggesting it.

Then evidence began to come out about it, and they said it’s ok, we wouldn’t ever join and neither would anyone else.

Then it was just a name for closer cooperation, the idea of an EU Army was ludicrous.

Now it’s that it’s not a ‘proper’ Army....we shouldn’t worry about it.

Next it’ll be ‘don’t worry it’ll never be deployed’...

Then it will be ‘it’ll never be used in anger’

At which point it’ll be too late.

Remainers are twats.
You voted to take away our veto. Own it.
 
Having paused to eat....

The federalists want a fully flexible labour force which will be able to be used to drive down labour costs, therefore, consider the secession states (Romania, Bulgaria, Lithuania etc) as a source of cheap labour. The situation is analogous to the USA and Mexico, cheap Hispanic labour propping up the capitalist edifice but at the same time being a political underclass.

The problem being that these poorer states are driven to the brink of financial collapse by the emigration of cheap labour to other, wealthier countries. Thus, as ever, the rich get richer and the poor get poorer.

The somewhat unintended consequence of this is that the poor folk within the richer states now feel disenfranchised by a tidal wave of migrant labour, thus giving rise to the so-called "populist" movement.UK has been the first to kick back against this, but I expect other states to start thinking about kicking the EU into touch as they become net contributors to the bloated edifice of Brussels rather than net recipients.

The above is a gross simplification and the real situation is more complex.
 
It's the element of Merkel's speech which says:

EU army to suppliment Nato.

What a load of BS.

Sent from my SM-A500FU using Tapatalk
It is in the open, Fourth Reich here we come with the collaborationist French poodle Macron on board and just itching for his mistress to annexe France into the Greater German Reich. Then other countries in the EU will be annexed either through voluntary means, or through the use of this EU army.

Just how soon before French school children are made to sing 'Deutschland Uber Alles' each day?.

You have been warned......
 
I would remind you that the original purpose of the EU was always the formation of a European Super-State (which I will call for brevity the USoE). The federalists of the original 6 members kicked this off and it was sold to the UK and several other nations (including Italy) as a "common market" trading block.

If, however, you dig into the small print of the original EU treaty you will find that it was always the ultimate aim to achiee the USoE in order to compete directly with Russia and the USA.

The lie was sold to the UK when we opted in in 1973 by the arch-liar and predecessor to Tony Bliar Harold Wilson. Wilson the pipe-smoking Gannex wearing man of the people who was anything but, and in priate smoked cheroots and had a degree from Oxford. He also managed to dodge war serice as a "political specialist" something which his Wiki entry glosses over.

Wilson also has a lot of parliamentary experience is obfusticating the truth and blocking bills he was apposed to by parliamentary procedure. Again glossed over in the Wiki entry.
Essentially correct, however it was the other serial liar and traitor Edward Heath who signed us up to the then Common Market, which we joined on Monday, January the first 1973.

Aslo, Italy was one of the original six members of the then EEC when it formed in 1957.
 
It is in the open, Fourth Reich here we come with the collaborationist French poodle Macron on board and just itching for his mistress to annexe France into the Greater German Reich. Then other countries in the EU will be annexed either through voluntary means, or through the use of this EU army.

Just how soon before French school children are made to sing 'Deutschland Uber Alles' each day?.

You have been warned......
Not quite but the Anthem is based on the work of a German Composer...

1542141992946.png

The European anthem - European Union - European Commission
 
Having paused to eat....

The federalists want a fully flexible labour force which will be able to be used to drive down labour costs, therefore, consider the secession states (Romania, Bulgaria, Lithuania etc) as a source of cheap labour. The situation is analogous to the USA and Mexico, cheap Hispanic labour propping up the capitalist edifice but at the same time being a political underclass.

The problem being that these poorer states are driven to the brink of financial collapse by the emigration of cheap labour to other, wealthier countries. Thus, as ever, the rich get richer and the poor get poorer.

The somewhat unintended consequence of this is that the poor folk within the richer states now feel disenfranchised by a tidal wave of migrant labour, thus giving rise to the so-called "populist" movement.UK has been the first to kick back against this, but I expect other states to start thinking about kicking the EU into touch as they become net contributors to the bloated edifice of Brussels rather than net recipients.

The above is a gross simplification and the real situation is more complex.
There was a good article in the financial section of the Daily Telegraph about five Thursdays ago on why European socialist parties are so been to tow the EU line when their voter bases are being undermined by the transmigration of basicially third world immigrants into western Europe and a consequent lowering of wages towards third world levels. The manifestation of this in Britain is stark.
 
There was a good article in the financial section of the Daily Telegraph about five Thursdays ago on why European socialist parties are so been to tow the EU line when their voter bases are being undermined by the transmigration of basicially third world immigrants into western Europe and a consequent lowering of wages towards third world levels. The manifestation of this in Britain is stark.
There was a programme on German TV last night about foreign drivers working for unbelieveably low pay. Lots of East Europeans and even Philipinos, all quite legal even for the Phillipinos as they get work permits from Poland and can then work for a "Poland based employer" throughout the EU. The outsourcing of drivers to Eastern Europe by German companies is very common. The conditions are horrific, even a dog deserves better than they get.
 

Similar threads


Latest Threads

Top