Typical bloody Europeans.There are currently 5 in the Champions League, have been since the return of football![]()
"What have UEFA ever done for us?"Typical bloody Europeans.
Protect them? He has a squad of 25 like every other team, he could play one team for Europe, one for premier league.
He is fast becoming the manager to replace Jose as the everyone is against me.
He mentioned Chris wilder several times, as Chris is one of the managers whose club voted against 5 subs, as it would be abused, you know it and I know it he is right.
For example my team spurs playing west brom away on a monday Night, Jose would change all 5.
I suspect if LFC won the narrative would have been something else from Klopp.Not sure what part of he might be right or wrong, only time will tell you are struggling with![]()
I suspect if LFC won the narrative would have been something else from Klopp.
In FA Cup matches and League cup matches, he wouldn’t dare field a second eleven in the premier or Europe.The narrative has been there for weeks, the interviewer was hitting back at the narrative, because Klopp questioned scheduling for all teams playing in Europe and the interviewer is part of the media outlet Klopp had a pop at.
Win Lose or Draw, the narrative would have been and has been consistent for weeks.
On the bright side, we may see a whole lot of youngsters and fringe players playing in January, we will see if the casual supporter tunes in to watch second 11’s playing against each other![]()
Ah, Klipperty makes a come back as MUFC climb into top 5...where have been for past 3 years?Yep, sounds like Klipperty has caught the moaning scouse bug.
Quick to take the broadcasters money but then blames them for injuries and kick off times.
You can’t have it both ways so do us a favour Klopp, shut up moaning, you are still top of the PL.
In FA Cup matches and League cup matches, he wouldn’t dare field a second eleven in the premier or Europe.
like I said don’t take the money if you do t want the fixtures.
I am not being obtuse I just dont see the relevance, of the 5 subs in the premiership. It offers a clear advantage to teams who have stronger squads.It’s almost like you are being deliberately obtuse!
He is not moaning about the number of fixtures, he is moaning about the scheduling of those fixtures for the teams playing in European competition.
Although he would be absolutely right to moan about meaningless International friendlies.
He is also saying that this is an unusual season, with a compressed fixture list to fit everything in and a limited pre season, therefore, like when football resumed and like what is happening across European competition, for this season it would be sensible to allow 5 substitutes.
He may be wrong and players may be able to keep going, or he may be right and England may be sending a team comprising of Lower Division players to the Euros next summer.
After all, the likes of Chris Wilder disagree with him, although it’s highly likely that Chris Wilder won’t be a premiership manager next year, whether there are 3, 5 or a whole team of swap. 1 point after 10 games does not bode well for him.
I am not being obtuse I just dont see the relevance, of the 5 subs in the premiership. It offers a clear advantage to teams who have stronger squads.
I would be more encouraged if he welcomed the concussion subs being trailed in the FA Cup.
Scheduling, You sign the deal you take your chances, what difference would kicking off at 15.00 on Saturday?
Chelsea had a clear advantage over spurs today due to scheduling, they had a full day more rest.
Do a bit of research and come back at the injuries sustained vs games played this season for the top 5 say?Alright then, not obtuse, but you are reacting to a single interview, when this issue has been running for weeks. Both Klopp and Pep were talking about it before the last international break and other managers hav3 voiced concerns.
And I don’t know how rest and recovery for professional athletes works, but apparently the highly paid medical experts clubs employ do. I do know that boxers don’t fight every week nor do marathon runners run a marathon every week, because they train to perform at peak fitness. Modern footballers are top athletes.
Hopefully (and I mean this) Spurs will not get many injuries and will be relatively unscathed. However, I guess you won’t show any sympathy if you suddenly get a sharp spike in injuries?
But these players aren’t machines, they are humans and this is their livelihood which lasts a relatively short time (regardless of what they earn).
I applaud managers showing leadership and standing up for them. It could teach the military a thing or two about sticking the head above the parapet for those they lead![]()
Do a bit of research and come back at the injuries sustained vs games played this season for the top 5 say?
Its kinda eye opening as games played, take your swiss lad.
I am not being obtuse I just dont see the relevance, of the 5 subs in the premiership. It offers a clear advantage to teams who have stronger squads.
That begs the question, does top teams field there best XI All the time, every game? They do not in my opinion.It may seem that way intuitively, but you're assuming it's a given. I've seen research which says the opposite.
Basically, the crux was that better teams lose more quality when they substitute, because the drop-off from elite 1st XI to their substitutes bench is farther. So Sheffield United make five subs for players who are closer to each other in quality, but the top clubs' elite players are replaced by ones who are more distant in quality. (Think of drop-off from VVD to any other defender replacing him, or a Kevin de Bruyne coming off.)
If you want to go all FIFA simpleton for a moment: LFC with 5 subs might drop from a 90 to an 80. Sheffield United might drop from an 80 to a 75. So whilst LFC are still stronger, the two teams are closer to each other in quality after substitutions.
So perhaps it's more complex than "stronger squads." One might alternatively frame the question as: "Would you rather your opponents took off 3 of their best players (starting XI), or 5 of them?"
In fairness, a LFC or MCFC second eleven at full strength could probably still beat most in the premiership.It may seem that way intuitively, but you're assuming it's a given. I've seen research which says the opposite.
Basically, the crux was that better teams lose more quality when they substitute, because the drop-off from elite 1st XI to their substitutes bench is farther. So Sheffield United make five subs for players who are closer to each other in quality, but the top clubs' elite players are replaced by ones who are more distant in quality. (Think of drop-off from VVD to any other defender replacing him, or a Kevin de Bruyne coming off.)
If you want to go all FIFA simpleton for a moment: LFC with 5 subs might drop from a 90 to an 80. Sheffield United might drop from an 80 to a 75. So whilst LFC are still stronger, the two teams are closer to each other in quality after substitutions.
So perhaps it's more complex than "stronger squads." One might alternatively frame the question as: "Would you rather your opponents took off 3 of their best players (starting XI), or 5 of them?"