The truth about Taliban 'reintegration'

Discussion in 'Afghanistan' started by Bushmills, Feb 12, 2012.

Welcome to the Army Rumour Service, ARRSE

The UK's largest and busiest UNofficial military website.

The heart of the site is the forum area, including:

  1. Gosh, what a surprise.
     
  2. It's worth bearing in mind Britain's seven million quid (out of a fund of 92 million) is small change compared to the cost to the UK of deploying troops over there, that's run at at least three billion quid PA.
    The Septics reckon a million bucks per pair of boots on the ground PA.

    In recent history Afghans have often actively switched sides for cash but they also like to be on the winning side, looking like you are liable to bugger off in a couple of years may not be helpful.

    A hundred quid a month may be a lot to Afghan but if your Terry chums (who pay pretty well) are going to come round and cut your balls off it may seem rather paltry. So it's no surprise there is lots of fraud by fake taliban but then even small gains would make this scheme cost effective.
     
  3. My thoughts exactly.
     
  4. It is all such a load of bollocks, the whole program is just another tick in the box before our abject failiure (victory in 2015/2014/2013) along the Afgan Police and ANA, they will all turn back to the dark side the moment we have****ed off. How the Government of this country should hang it's collective head in shame. It knows what it is going to do, it knows the likely outcome, yet it will go ahead and do it with their head held high because on paper they ticked the right boxes.
    If they want to pull out just do it, I cannot see the point of losing one more coalition life for the shitehole for the sake of what is now a face saving exercise.
    Just get out and say we****ed it up but we tried, we let our troops down, we apologise for every injury and death to British troops, who by the way were as ever outstanding in their efforts to secure our flawed policies.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  5. The Taliban's position was stated about a year or so ago: that there was no point in negotiating as they would simply wait until the Western forces had buggered off, then they would retake the country.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  6. A bloody shame but I think I have to agree with you.

    I worked on the "National Solidarity program" which had more logical holes than a string vest and a couple of equally cracked brained UN programs.

    As discussed before, the reconstruction policies have all been made by over educated idiots with no common sense and there has been way too much mission creep.

    This latest scheme is merely a continuation of a comedy of errors.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  7. seaweed

    seaweed LE Book Reviewer

    The creativity with which our Govt finds ever more pointless ways to throw away our money is amazing.
     
  8. Word is anyway and regardless that once the troopies leave, the glorious and dashing Afgahn leader will be 5 mins behind them, such is his love amongst his people
     
  9. Such the £350 million a year we give to that nuclear, space programme country known as India. If they think that building the bomb is more worthwhile than housing and feeding the 990million citizens who live in adject poverty, who are we to argue with them. But 350 pence would be an out rage. Same as China I be leave.
     
  10. Yup - as another post said, they are simply fulfilling one of their promises, possibly made to the UN, US or whatever. Our politicians in particular still haven't made the connection between their throwing money at various impossible projects, and the contributions/donations made by the taxpayer. Time someone showed them!
     
  11. Same as Pakistan - spend millions, including our aid, on nuclear and other weapons, and do nothing about shoring up the banks of the Indus to prevent future flooding.
     
  12. ehwhat

    ehwhat Old-Salt Book Reviewer

    Not really news is it? This is a rehash from the mid 1800s payout for stability/peace. It only works to a point, has no lasting positive effect on the area and reinforces perceptions of weakness. One gets what one pays for and in this instance, we get an exit.

    The Taliban are not stupid, uncoordinated, or unable to learn from mistakes. They have demonstrated an ability to rapidly exploit weaknesses or tactical errors. The opening of an office in Qatar is much more a statement of political intent for reacquisition of national power rather than an overture to Karzai for "peace." Any understanding reached between the two will be of very short duration. Most observers might suggest that Karzai should be considering his travel arrangements.

    If you have an interest, you might consider an article from 2009 that critiqued the IC understanding of the Taliban and efforts for containment. Don't agree with all the points but found it useful at the time and unfortunately much of what was correct was not addressed.
    http://carnegieendowment.org/files/taliban_winning_strategy.pdf

    "I would characterize the Taliban strategy in very simple terms," said retired Army Lt. Gen. David Barno. Speaking at the Marine conference on counterinsurgency last Wednesday, Barno, who was the overall commander in Afghanistan from 2003 to 2005, and was one of the more competent generals we've had there, said the Talibian think that they are winning and that the war is nearly over, and so "their strategy is simply to run out the clock." 2009
     
  13. There are slight differences with the Indians, Pindi takes the aid and is fast tracking its nuclear arsenal AND is fighting a proxy war against USAF via folk like the Haqqanis. A war that probably can be sustained indefinitely as they have secure rear basing in FATA, a river of money from the Kingships and an endless supply of cannon fodder from the Deobandi Madrasahs. Pindi has also milked the LOS up from Karachi for over a decade. Folk who are not even worried about losing tens of millions civilians in a nuclear exchange with India aren't likely to care much about the Indus banks.