Thank you for your cogent, well reasoned response.I think your pants are on fire.
Thank you for your cogent, well reasoned response.I think your pants are on fire.
One does not use the word "reason" when speaking about Dipso.Thank you for your cogent, well reasoned response.
LVH, I have not read the filings myself. I read a damning overview of the filings, typos and all in Newsweek, which gives all you need to know.Already linked earlier in the thread.
Other than typo's does law suit make sense to you?
So; the Trump Case is on the way up to SCOTUS for Pennsylvania and presumably Michigan/Wisconsin. With the Kraken, stirring the pot in the meantime in Georgia. Its all so silly.
If the DNC had nothing to hide, then they're should have let Trump and his acolytes exhaust themselves on finding imaginary votes.. The complete refusal by the courts and state secretaries actually makes the allegations, more accepted, as trust is at an absolute minimum.
i.e. Take Trumps three biggest detractors off this thread and ask them to organise an election. Then allow them to do the counts(BLM and Antifa were evident in the counting halls, according to the sworn affidavits) and then allow them to reject any evidence of anomalies... Why anyone on the Trump side would believe people who have lost objectivity is beyond me.
Courts are rather expected to decide each case on the basis of the facts and arguments before them, and the law. Not grant a proportion of consolation wins to the losing side. Completely agree with you that "It's all so silly."So; the Trump Case is on the way up to SCOTUS for Pennsylvania and presumably Michigan/Wisconsin. With the Kraken, stirring the pot in the meantime in Georgia. Its all so silly.
If the DNC had nothing to hide, then they're should have let Trump and his acolytes exhaust themselves on finding imaginary votes.. The complete refusal by the courts and state secretaries actually makes the allegations, more accepted, as trust is at an absolute minimum.
i.e. Take Trumps three biggest detractors off this thread and ask them to organise an election. Then allow them to do the counts(BLM and Antifa were evident in the counting halls, according to the sworn affidavits) and then allow them to reject any evidence of anomalies... Why anyone on the Trump side would believe people who have lost objectivity is beyond me.
“Free, fair elections are the lifeblood of our democracy,” Judge Stephanos Bibas, a Trump appointee, wrote in the 21-page opinion, according to the AP. “Charges of unfairness are serious. But calling an election unfair does not make it so. Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here.”So; the Trump Case is on the way up to SCOTUS for Pennsylvania and presumably Michigan/Wisconsin. With the Kraken, stirring the pot in the meantime in Georgia. Its all so silly.
If the DNC had nothing to hide, then they're should have let Trump and his acolytes exhaust themselves on finding imaginary votes.. The complete refusal by the courts and state secretaries actually makes the allegations, more accepted, as trust is at an absolute minimum.
i.e. Take Trumps three biggest detractors off this thread and ask them to organise an election. Then allow them to do the counts(BLM and Antifa were evident in the counting halls, according to the sworn affidavits) and then allow them to reject any evidence of anomalies... Why anyone on the Trump side would believe people who have lost objectivity is beyond me.
Go SPOTY!
Agreed. The 21-page judgement by Judge Stephanos Bibas can be seen here:“Free, fair elections are the lifeblood of our democracy,” Judge Stephanos Bibas, a Trump appointee, wrote in the 21-page opinion, according to the AP. “Charges of unfairness are serious. But calling an election unfair does not make it so. Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here.”
Based on the Justice's opinion, how is this going to SCOTUS with no proof?
It's a pretty brutal judgement! I wonder who appointed Judge Bibas?Agreed. The 21-page judgement by Judge Stephanos Bibas can be seen here:
So; the Trump Case is on the way up to SCOTUS for Pennsylvania and presumably Michigan/Wisconsin. With the Kraken, stirring the pot in the meantime in Georgia. Its all so silly.
If the DNC had nothing to hide, then they're should have let Trump and his acolytes exhaust themselves on finding imaginary votes.. The complete refusal by the courts and state secretaries actually makes the allegations, more accepted, as trust is at an absolute minimum.
i.e. Take Trumps three biggest detractors off this thread and ask them to organise an election. Then allow them to do the counts(BLM and Antifa were evident in the counting halls, according to the sworn affidavits) and then allow them to reject any evidence of anomalies... Why anyone on the Trump side would believe people who have lost objectivity is beyond me.
Another winning pick by the great winner.It's a pretty brutal judgement! I wonder who appointed Judge Bibas?
Your determination to find "something wrong" is bordering on the insane. Those courts and state secretaries you mentioned in your post didn't refuse anything, but they demanded viable and verifiable proof before acting. Let's not forget that Dipshit Donny and his bunch of loonies have, to date, lost 37 court cases. Does that not tell you something about the quality of "evidence" they're presenting?So; the Trump Case is on the way up to SCOTUS for Pennsylvania and presumably Michigan/Wisconsin. With the Kraken, stirring the pot in the meantime in Georgia. Its all so silly.
If the DNC had nothing to hide, then they're should have let Trump and his acolytes exhaust themselves on finding imaginary votes.. The complete refusal by the courts and state secretaries actually makes the allegations, more accepted, as trust is at an absolute minimum.
i.e. Take Trumps three biggest detractors off this thread and ask them to organise an election. Then allow them to do the counts(BLM and Antifa were evident in the counting halls, according to the sworn affidavits) and then allow them to reject any evidence of anomalies... Why anyone on the Trump side would believe people who have lost objectivity is beyond me.
You seem to forget that Ecommiecon is only obeying orders from whichever anti-freeze swilling wife-beater is the duty manager at the troll farm this evening. He doesn't care that what he is typing is completely insane. Trolls will troll.Your determination to find "something wrong" is bordering on the insane. Those courts and state secretaries you mentioned in your post didn't refuse anything, but they demanded viable and verifiable proof before acting. Let's not forget that Dipshit Donny and his bunch of loonies have, to date, lost 37 court cases. Does that not tell you something about the quality of "evidence" they're presenting?
Your last sentence is actually the clincher. I quote: "Why anyone on the Trump side would believe people who have lost objectivity is beyond me." Are you really implying that your man there and his minions are in any way "impartial" themselves? They were been honking on about "fraud" even before the elections started. So when it was all over, off they went looking for "fraud". A sort of "we already have the result, now let's find the proof" exercise. You really should give your dumpling a good wobble.
MsG
He was appointed by Trump in 2017. The other two judges were appointed by G.W. Bush.It's a pretty brutal judgement! I wonder who appointed Judge Bibas?
Lets see where the expected appeal ends up.He was appointed by Trump in 2017. The other two judges were appointed by G.W. Bush.
Clue no.2: 'pending an appeal'Here's a clue
![]()