The Trump Presidency...


The response tweets are well worth a read.

I liked this one: Trump Says He Predicted Brexit From Scotland Before The Vote

Errrh, ummm. Shum mishtake Shirley. Wottevva.

And this one: the president of the united states of america's tweet gave me so much cancer
 

desert_rat

Old-Salt
A supernatural view of events. And why not? The whole universe has an opinion of The Maestro and what is going on in America. It's a good idea to look at all POV. Plus the fact I like throwing a monkey wrench in the predictable on this thread and also to watch @Helm go into action with Pavlovian predicability. (I'm quite fond of him really.)

Get the popcorn as there is going to be fractals and Fibonacci sequences. What does mathematics have anything to do with Trump, I hear you ask. For the open minded, non-haters, enjoy the show.

 

Helm

MIA
Moderator
Book Reviewer
A supernatural view of events. And why not? The whole universe has an opinion of The Maestro and what is going on in America. It's a good idea to look at all POV. Plus the fact I like throwing a monkey wrench in the predictable on this thread and also to watch @Helm go into action with Pavlovian predicability. (I'm quite fond of him really.)

Get the popcorn as there is going to be fractals and Fibonacci sequences. What does mathematics have anything to do with Trump, I hear you ask. For the open minded, non-haters, enjoy the show.

Tedious and dull, why just like you Y.U.M.
 
A supernatural view of events. And why not? The whole universe has an opinion of The Maestro and what is going on in America. It's a good idea to look at all POV. Plus the fact I like throwing a monkey wrench in the predictable on this thread and also to watch @Helm go into action with Pavlovian predicability. (I'm quite fond of him really.)

Get the popcorn as there is going to be fractals and Fibonacci sequences. What does mathematics have anything to do with Trump, I hear you ask. For the open minded, non-haters, enjoy the show.

I tend not to mash the mong buttons as they don't add a huge amount to a conversation but you are a temptation.

You do realise that that video is a well produced advertisement with a load of wibble in the middle. Dont you? It starts off advertising $5 worth of packaged survival food for $75 and ends up advertising T-shirts and other merch.

In between the adverts it is pure unadulterated tinfoiler wibble designed to intrigue the dim witted conspiracy theorist with almost the entire catalogue of stupid. It is a great effort at hauling in the hard of thinking with a rancid stew of incomprehensible nonsense, rehashed CTs, cherry picking data and general ignorance. So lets begin.

No good alt right racist and ant-Semitic CT vid wouldn't immediately launch into the NWO and the Rothschild Cabal. And it does. Box ticked.

Apparently they are controlling mankind with demonic viruses. Nonsense box ticked.

The Rothschild Cabal put Greenspan in charge of the Fed to create a housing crash. Anti-Semitic double whammy tick.

The mental numerology stuff is pure drivel. Cherry picking at its finest. Wibble box ticked.

"The White House controls the casinos" and "fractals were used by crooked Hillary" ticked the random stupid box.

The rubbish on the Fibonacci sequence would shame a 12 year old maths student. Claiming its presence in natural sequences is proof of God is a bit of a stretch. Off the top of my head I can see all manner of other sequences in nature: arithmetic, geometric, figurate, prime and triangle to name a few. Nature orders shit in the easiest way and these are them. Hard of thinking box ticked.

Then it launched into a whole load of standard CT nonsense with the Rothschild Cabal controlling mankind through Big Pharma, chemtrails, fluoridation, vaccination etc. Drivel box ticked.

So it was the usual catalogue of random CT stuff designed to provide the terminally deluded with arcane knowledge that only they are privy to. This is nice as it elevates them above the sheeple whilst encouraging them to buy unnecessary stuff at ten times the price.

I wish the Fibonacci Sequence did prove the existence of God. I would ask him for my 20 minutes of life back.

Do you ever go outdoors?
 
a maximum working week of 48 hours, with 39 hours being closer to the norm. Exceptions exist, but as a society, we earn enough money to live well and have enough time off to enjoy the money we earn.
In my last UK job it was close to 60hrs/week on average, and no, no overtime - but I was salaried. That said, it was very flexible with possibility of working from home for a couple of days every week, so I was OK with it.
 
I wonder if lying constantly is a psychological condition - probably is - and if so, needs medical help. I mean, people do lie from time to time - I did a couple of times in the past, to avoid conflict or dealings with parents or GFs, but doing it constantly, where you do you begin or deal with it?

 
I watched the live White House press conference yesterday even though SHS drives me up the wall with her non answers and violent rhetoric when defending the glorious leaders mistakes.

What I find disturbing from that press meeting is that an 'official' in the White House administration would state that the Democrats are perfectly capable of coming together and agreeing on the fact that they are comfortable ripping babies straight from a mother’s womb, or killing a baby after birth. she said, intentionally blurring the line between late-term abortions, a procedure undergone by a very small minority of women, often under dire circumstances, and killing a baby, which is infanticide.

To top it all it was an answer to a simple question when Jim Acosta asked Sanders if she would at least agree that Trump’s superheated rhetoric is “sort of beneath everybody.”

“Do you think that the president has thought at all, going into this 2020 campaign, that the rhetoric just needs to be lowered?” Acosta asked. “Whether it’s talking about Democrats, the media, immigrants — or should we just plan on hearing the president use the same kind of language that we heard in 2016, and all through the first couple years of this administration?”

Is this what American politics has come down to calling your opposition out and out murderers? This is just the beginning of the election campaign how much lower they will go has yet to be seen. This is going to be the worst campaign Americans have ever seen I think.

Link
 

Sadurian

LE
Book Reviewer
I watched the live White House press conference yesterday even though SHS drives me up the wall with her non answers and violent rhetoric when defending the glorious leaders mistakes.

What I find disturbing from that press meeting is that an 'official' in the White House administration would state that the Democrats are perfectly capable of coming together and agreeing on the fact that they are comfortable ripping babies straight from a mother’s womb, or killing a baby after birth. she said, intentionally blurring the line between late-term abortions, a procedure undergone by a very small minority of women, often under dire circumstances, and killing a baby, which is infanticide.

To top it all it was an answer to a simple question when Jim Acosta asked Sanders if she would at least agree that Trump’s superheated rhetoric is “sort of beneath everybody.”

“Do you think that the president has thought at all, going into this 2020 campaign, that the rhetoric just needs to be lowered?” Acosta asked. “Whether it’s talking about Democrats, the media, immigrants — or should we just plan on hearing the president use the same kind of language that we heard in 2016, and all through the first couple years of this administration?”

Is this what American politics has come down to calling your opposition out and out murderers? This is just the beginning of the election campaign how much lower they will go has yet to be seen. This is going to be the worst campaign Americans have ever seen I think.

Link
Trump's team are discovering a new level of low.

That won't stop them from mining deeper to find an even lower level, of course.
 
D

Deleted 24582

Guest
I watched the live White House press conference yesterday even though SHS drives me up the wall with her non answers and violent rhetoric when defending the glorious leaders mistakes.

What I find disturbing from that press meeting is that an 'official' in the White House administration would state that the Democrats are perfectly capable of coming together and agreeing on the fact that they are comfortable ripping babies straight from a mother’s womb, or killing a baby after birth. she said, intentionally blurring the line between late-term abortions, a procedure undergone by a very small minority of women, often under dire circumstances, and killing a baby, which is infanticide.

To top it all it was an answer to a simple question when Jim Acosta asked Sanders if she would at least agree that Trump’s superheated rhetoric is “sort of beneath everybody.”

“Do you think that the president has thought at all, going into this 2020 campaign, that the rhetoric just needs to be lowered?” Acosta asked. “Whether it’s talking about Democrats, the media, immigrants — or should we just plan on hearing the president use the same kind of language that we heard in 2016, and all through the first couple years of this administration?”

Is this what American politics has come down to calling your opposition out and out murderers? This is just the beginning of the election campaign how much lower they will go has yet to be seen. This is going to be the worst campaign Americans have ever seen I think.

Link
Abortion politics is something that creates great distaste in both sides.

Republicans pound abortion ‘infanticide’ message

Schwacking a newborn who survived a failed abortion attempt takes some stones. It is murder put simply.
 

Sadurian

LE
Book Reviewer
Abortion politics is something that creates great distaste in both sides.

Republicans pound abortion ‘infanticide’ message

Schwacking a newborn who survived a failed abortion attempt takes some stones. It is murder put simply.
Murder is illegal killing. If killing is done under law then it is not illegal and therefore not murder.

I believe in controlled euthanasia, we allow it for animals to end uncontrollable or incurable pain and suffering, and I believe that the same rights should be given to humans. However, many people disagree and I respect their views on the subject.

What I don't respect is twisting the narrative and blurring the facts to make a case based on lies and emotive half-truths. The use of the word 'murder' in this case comes into that category.
 
D

Deleted 24582

Guest
Murder is illegal killing. If killing is done under law then it is not illegal and therefore not murder.

I believe in controlled euthanasia, we allow it for animals to end uncontrollable or incurable pain and suffering, and I believe that the same rights should be given to humans. However, many people disagree and I respect their views on the subject.

What I don't respect is twisting the narrative and blurring the facts to make a case based on lies and emotive half-truths. The use of the word 'murder' in this case comes into that category.
An infant is not a deer however, nor can it make decisions for itself. We will have to agree to disagree but were you about to euthanize a newborn and I put a controlled pair in your chest, I guess I could call that preservation of life.
 

Helm

MIA
Moderator
Book Reviewer
An infant is not a deer however, nor can it make decisions for itself. We will have to agree to disagree but were you about to euthanize a newborn and I put a controlled pair in your chest, I guess I could call that preservation of life.
Ah the American catch all, shoot at it if you disagree.
 
An infant is not a deer however, nor can it make decisions for itself. We will have to agree to disagree but were you about to euthanize a newborn and I put a controlled pair in your chest, I guess I could call that preservation of life.
But then again you have swallowed the orange man **** so your opinion is as biased as mine. If you cannot see the problem with a public official making these outrageous statements then all is really and truly lost in American politics.

It's right up there as a ridiculous statement but even worse than Palins "Canadian Death Squads" in response to, god forbid, somebody trying to give everybody decent affordable healthcare.
 
D

Deleted 24582

Guest
Ah the American catch all, shoot at it if you disagree.
Not quite, preservation of life.

I may not agree with you and will debate with you. However if you are in the process of attempting to take a life then force on my end is justified to preserve that life. Murder it is not.
 
D

Deleted 24582

Guest
But then again you have swallowed the orange man **** so your opinion is as biased as mine. If you cannot see the problem with a public official making these outrageous statements then all is really and truly lost in American politics.
One party rides this platform and champions it, the other side despises it. Of course it will be political.
 
One party rides this platform and champions it, the other side despises it. Of course it will be political.
You are missing the point.
 

Sadurian

LE
Book Reviewer
An infant is not a deer however, nor can it make decisions for itself. We will have to agree to disagree but were you about to euthanize a newborn and I put a controlled pair in your chest, I guess I could call that preservation of life.
The arguments in the debate are for post-delivery euthanasia being employed in a very small number of cases, where the infant is clearly non-viable or has severe foetal abnormalities and an attempt to abort has already been made but failed.

You are in favour of gun ownership and of the private use of guns to kill other humans. Yet you are opposed to killing in order to save a dying baby from suffering? I see that as a dichotomy.
 

New Posts

Latest Threads

Top