Just received my RLC Review. Whilst it has certainly grown in size, and there are some pretty decent contributions, the Review comprises, nearly without exception (the exception (just) being the anon article about a mute waiter in the Far East) seriously dry content, and is sadly lacking in humour. Perhaps this is deliberate, and an attempt by the RLC to publicly proclaim itself as a serious, competent, professional outfit. However, articles such as those that used to be penned by 'Sustainer' would, in my opinion add a little balance to the Review and show that although we take our profession seriously, we take ourselves less so. Just a thought.