The regimental system - past its sell-by date?

Discussion in 'Strategic Defence & Spending Review (SDSR)' started by Charm_City, Jul 8, 2012.

Welcome to the Army Rumour Service, ARRSE

The UK's largest and busiest UNofficial military website.

The heart of the site is the forum area, including:

  1. As a very former REMF and CCW I'm setting myself up for a battering but it would seem the regimental system is increasingly a handicap rather than an asset to the British Army.

    I've always understood the justification for the system to be twofold, a tangible benefit of promoting recruitemt and, more intangibly, as something that inculcated group cohesion, ethos, fighting spirit, etc and thus materially contributed to military effectiveness. What has been made public of regimental politicing in the lead up to Army 2020, certainly as far as infantry and RAC are concerned, would suggest that considerations of regiment/capbadge serve to distort any attempt at an objective review of the Army. Has it has it's day? Should it be full steam ahead to a Corps of Infantry and a RAC that is just that?
  2. Only by about half a century, unless someone can point me in the direction of a defence review in living memory that hasn't been influenced by Capbadge protectionism ^~
    • Like Like x 1
  3. I wouldn't like to see capbadges go, but what has always confused me is why we need to change them in the first place when they can be united under a 'Corps of Infantry'. The larger regiments such as the Rifles have seen the benefit of doing this on a smaller scale, allowing the correctly qualified and best people to move around to the appointments where they are need. You could still have the RRF, the PWRR, The Blackwatch etc but allowing people to move around more after a few years makes perfect sense to me. The ludicrous system in place at the moment, shown by the 2RRF debacle, shows that infantry names are more important than effectivness.
  4. The textbook answer. But our own senior leadership have spectatcularly failed to grasp this particular nettle. The capbadges are being merged into meaninglessness anyway - it is time to do the decent thing and put them out of their misery.
  5. Being a Corps manI have seen first hand how quickly a man can change his loyalty from one Sqn or Regt to another to the extent of drinking down town one week with a bunch of lads to fighting them the next because he has moved units.

    Pride and unit ethos is wonderful but in my experience not interchangeable. Capability requirements should always drive reviews unfortunately in the case of HM Forces it has never been the case
  6. Personnally I don't see what it is about the cap badge and the "local regiment" that get's so many up in arms.

    My cap tally changes every 2 years (or more) as I move from unit to unit, my home town's associated ship (HMS Active) is currently in the service of the Pakistani Navy (under the name Shah Jahan) her ships bell and Battle Honours board are currently held at the local Sea Cadet Unit.

    What for me stays the same is my trade badge- it's possible to tell what job a matelot does just by looking at their right arm, my cap badge changes upon promotion (a newbadge is worn on promotion to PO, CPO, WO 2 and then as a commisioned officer). I don't have any loyalties to the unit I serve, but the servie which I am in.
  7. Corp of infantry?
    Thanks but no thanks.
  8. I agree that a Corps of Infantry would be a step too far, but the Canadians seem to manage with three Regular capbadges i.e. The Royal Canadian Regiment (East Coast), The Royal 22e Regiment (Quebec) and the Princess Patricia's Canadian Light Infantry (West Coast and Canadian Prairie). We could manage with six Regular capbadges, including preserving your own i.e. four geographical (England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland), two specific i.e. the Foot Guards and the Parachute Regiment. Why would we possibly need more?
    • Like Like x 1
  9. Just because you are Corps doesn't exclude specialists, look at the 'hat' Regt's in the RE & RA more Airborne than Airborne if you listen to some of them ^~
    • Like Like x 1
  10. Why a step too far? Would 1, 2, 3, etc Inf Bn be much worse than the present mish-mash? By all means retain some historical links, but don't fetishise them.

    Would recruiting be drastically affected? - noting that probably the mose identifable element of the infantry, the Jocks, seem unable to attract sufficient numbers. Would there be an effect on military capability of the infantry?
  11. A Corps of Infantry? My heart says no, but my head says yes.

    Like many (former) Infantrymen I am bound in my heart to the capbadge I wore, but previous posters are getting it right that except in very few circumstances and Regiments it is going wrong. The Large Regiment organisations do however, show both sides of the coin. The Rifles have done things extremely well, embracing the new whilst retaining strong elements of their past; IMHO the Royal Regiment of Scotland have got it wrong in trying to ''over preserve' the tribalism that we Infantry soldiers tend to be guilty of.

    Perhaps the OP is right and the time HAS come. Like most here I suspect that I, and many others, would, as we usually do, hate it to start with - but would accept it and crack on.
    • Like Like x 2
  12. Corp of infantry 'Venivi ad meum primordium sicut circulus'
  13. I think this is one of the most simplistic money saving ideas when you think of the standardised uniform and other shite.

    The other points such as the ability to move qualified people into new positions quickly and discouraging special treatment would improve how the infantry was managed.

    Ofcourse this would never happen though as the guards officers would have to be convinced they were still human and para's that they are mortal.
  14. "Venivi to my beginning as a circle"' according to Herr Google of the 21st Century.

    Do it in plain English. My Latin teacher died of Leukemia when I was a second former. I was chuffed to ****, he was such an arrogant, bullying pain in the arse. I've tarred all Latin fans since with the same brush.

    Prove me wrong.
  15. Auld-Yin

    Auld-Yin LE Reviewer Book Reviewer Reviews Editor

    Strange, my Google came up with this: Please translate from english to latin: I have come full circle.? - Yahoo! Answers which I find, as a non Latin speaker/reader, quite easy to understand.

    I also understand while TS used the phrase.

    Maybe your Google teacher also committed hari-kiri.
    • Like Like x 1