The Phantom Thread Snatcher

Discussion in 'Army Reserve' started by RP578, Jan 20, 2010.

Welcome to the Army Rumour Service, ARRSE

The UK's largest and busiest UNofficial military website.

The heart of the site is the forum area, including:

  1. RP578

    RP578 LE Book Reviewer

    Dr Evil,

    Your previous thread appears to be in the hole and I can't seem to post on it further. So to answer your question:

    No, it's not wrong. In British English the word 'strove' is a simple past tense and 'striven' is the past participle' of 'to strive'. 'Strived' can be used as both simple past and past participle.

    In American English, 'strived' is not recognised (or even recognized) and only 'strove' and 'striven' are used. Hope this helps and good luck with your A Levels 'old boy'!

    Mods/phantom, feel free to move or erase as applicable.
  2. who cares?
  3. I'm happy to sit at your learned knee, RP. I just disagree with your view that "strived" is Britishy and "strove" Yankee.

    See a Septic dictionary.

    And the bling gong is still just that!
  4. Biped

    Biped LE Book Reviewer

    This would suggest sir that you are actually a luddite for not taking into consideration that both Americanese and English are living languages, and that the so-called 'rules' of those who created our dictionaries and thesauri where merely Victorians and those who passed before who were striving, or who strove to formalise a language construed out of myriad older languages and rules.

    The truth is, they didn't do a very good job. Luckily, our language continues to evolve and flourish, and the rules are even today being re-written by the yoof that follows. Gr8 eh?

    For words that you say are not recognised; by what fine body are they not recognised? The same that now recognise 'Franglais' for example?

    How would Shakespear get on today if he had to follow all these horrible rules? What about that Scottish chap in the Victorian age who wrote those poems so beloved of Queen Victoria? Should we correct him too?
  5. who cares?
  6. We care, smudge. We really do. It's OK. Go ahead, let it all out.
  7. By the way, I am dismayed that a genuine attempt to slag off bogus bling - OK, on a somewhat shaky grammatical basis - has become a Melvyn Bragg face-off which lives under constant fear of being zapped by the Thread Overlords. It's like living in Iran, only without the jokes.
  8. RP578

    RP578 LE Book Reviewer


    Not at all, I am anything but a grammar Nazi ('Grazi'). In the original thread, Dr_E thought that the word 'strived' was bad grammar or even fictious. I merely pointed out that it does exist and was used correctly. The bit about the American versus British English was to show why the word gets highlighted as incorrect by Spellcheck.

    Dr_Evil, you are of course correct. The bling is a load of shiny manure.
  9. Grazie.
  10. Thanks



    That's much better :)