The Numbers Game

Discussion in 'OTC and ACF' started by illbeamonkeysoon, Mar 7, 2006.

Welcome to the Army Rumour Service, ARRSE

The UK's largest and busiest UNofficial military website.

The heart of the site is the forum area, including:

  1. I recently assisted running a 3 star board for my County HQ and the standard was disgusting. My boss decided to pass the majority of them on the grounds they, "weren't too bad." This 'pass them it'll be alright' attitude has become a recurring theme throughout my county for all the star boards, something the cadets are increasingly becoming aware of.

    This really gets my back up, 3 Star standard should mean the cadets knowledge is vast enough to attend the SCIC, lead cadets in the field/ activities, and teach junior cadets at the detachment. It also makes a mockery of everyone who passed their 3 star at a decent standard. If the 3 star knowledge isn't properly retained in a cadets mind then everything on offer from then on in their cadet career will be a waste of time.

    Now, is this a question of ACF HQ's having a quota to meet in terms of APC star passes annually?

    Is the ACF Officer/ AI attitude becoming too soft?

    Is the standard of ACF cadet dropping? If so why?

    Do other counties have similiar issues?

    Your thoughts please.....

  2. This is one oif those perennial subjects, each generation of cadets seem to have it easier than the last lot (from someone who's been around for a few of these cadet generations).

    However, there is a lot of pressure from Brigade HQs to produce 'numbered' results and this can influence the less bolshie of us to give the benefit of the doubt a little too liberally.

    A case in point is the last training weekend that my company held. I am the officer responsible for two star testing in my company. Unfortunately, I found that the standard of training of the cadets that were presented for testing simply didn't make the grade, therefore not many passes that weekend and I must confess that I did get a few sharp words from various quarters.
  3. Sea Cadet RNI (Royal Navy Inspections) mark you down if you as a unit dont promote enough Cadets. this leads to less funding.

    Perhaps its similare in the ACF?

  4. This is absolutly true, the standard now is a lot slacker than from when I was a Cadet (which was'nt actually that long ago).

    In all honesty though, if the detachment instructors are training their kids to a high degree, and are enforcing discipline, then there should'nt be many problems. There is only a very small percentage of Cadets that are such mongs that they cannot be taught anything, and even those generally don't cause any trouble.

    So, if you are a Company level instructor, you need to grip the DC's of the underperforming detachments, as generally the underperformers tend to come from one detachment in particular.

    Remember, theres no such thing as a bad cadet, only bad instructors......well, most of the time.


  5. Whilst i agree, i dont 100%....

    with falling standards in education i find a higher percentage of cadets now who cant tell left from right, do math in thier heads or remember any part of part 1 sylibus for more that 1 parade night, and thier writing skills lead much to be desired.... i have a cadet who just turned 18 and is transitioning from cadet to staff, he filled the forms in and i swear, my 7 year old daughter did it. he cant even spell his own address correctly.

    The standards are appauling and unfortunately i havent the time to teach them the stuff school and parents should have done.

  6. I'm only at company level on Company Training Weekends, the rest of the time I'm a DC (I view this as by far my primary role), so I lack the authority to knock heads together. However, the reports I sent out after the weekend left my views in no doubt.
  7. That wasn't a dig at you mate, it was more of a blanket statement aimed at Company Training Officers who do the job every week, and are employed solely for training. Im at Company level as I deal with Sports, but as you said our detachments must come first. As it happens though, my lot are amazingly good at sports! :p

    Its true though, that the standards of the kids are slipping, but all we can do is to try to help them as best we can, it may not be our responsibility, but theres no harm in trying. The best thing to do is to drum subjects into their heads time and time again, and to make it known that if they arn't good enough, they won't pass. In our County we seperate our star level groups in to county cadres on annual camps, and so letting someone pass 2* on company level only to see them bomb 3* Company on annual isn't really the way forward, in our County at least.
  8. Didn't take it as a dig old chap, I was simply further explaining my predicament.

    Totally agree with your second paragraph though, couldn't have put it better myself!
  9. I'm glad it's not just my county this is happening in. It appears to be a case of quantity not quality. I'm sure it's something to do with the Cadet Reporter thing that gets submitted to ACFA (correct me if I'm wrong). Passes equal money.

    X our annual camp runs the same way. One of the cadre commanders asked the senior cadets which cadets should pass 2 star Fieldcraft, WTF!!!
  10. Bloody ludicrous!!!!! 8O
  11. standardisation of ACF testing hey? Blo8ody absurd!!!!!!!! :twisted:
  12. Jesus assuming that said cadre commander is a total mong...............

    This is ridiculous, you then get into the areas where little Johnny called little Timmy a biff, and so Big Tommy who's Timmys big brother or bestest friend says that Johnny is crap at Fieldcraft, when in reality you're dealing with Ray Mear's stunt double.
  13. Yep, she's a mong. She's also a Company Commander. Needless to say the senior cadets were so amazed at being asked that none of those under assesment passed.
  14. Standards are not falling everywhere...

    As an ATC instructor, I can definitely say that the ATC syllabus is a lot HARDER than it was when I was a cadet (1982-1990). I really have to know exactly what I'm talking about these days, study the course material and certainly couldnt blag my way through in an attempt to bamboozle impressionable teenagers. (not that I've ever done that of course!!)

    But the generally dismal standards of English, handwriting and use of 'txt spk' is on the increase. If it was up to me I would fail anyone for using poor handwriting, poor english or using text in their submissions. But that would mean failing practically everyone!

    This year we have submitted 37 cadets for exams, and got 37 passes, several with merit or distinction. 4 of these cadets are said to have 'learning difficulties' one of whom got a merit.
  15. I'm referring to my experience of the ACF, i was'nt referring to the ATC as I have no experience there.

    Interesting point about the learning difficulties though, as ive got a lad at my det who has learning difficulties, and he hasnt had any problems at all with taking in information, interacting with other cadets, passing star level exams etc.

    Is this experience shared by other instructors on the board?